ImageImage

Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

TroyD92
RealGM
Posts: 23,757
And1: 11,402
Joined: Mar 28, 2013
Location: Renewed Hope
 

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#841 » by TroyD92 » Sat May 24, 2014 9:53 pm

pilprin wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:
pilprin wrote:I honestly don't know which one I like more. Embiid could be a monster....he looks to have it all. Wiggins...6-8 kid who can move like a Gazelle and will only get better. Parker...also 6-8 but a thick 6-8...can score...flat out score. Both Wiggins and Parker have big wingspans...over 7 feet.

If you take Embiid...he's a #4/5...Parker...Likely a #4 and Wiggins and #3. All fit....making Ersan tradebait IMHO.

Would Houston take him for their 1st rounder? I really want another PG.


If you want to pigeon hole positions Wiggins is clearly a 2.


Wow...he would be a long #2...Nice! He is big enough to play #3 though.


Absolutely I was just talking in terms of fit on this team. I think he could easily play the 2 or 3.
VooDoo7 wrote:
JEIS wrote:

Kidd would have curb stomped him.

Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.


Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,688
And1: 13,857
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#842 » by th87 » Sat May 24, 2014 10:26 pm

DanoMac wrote:
th87 wrote:Wow, within a span of 24 hours, I went from being ecstatic about the 2 spot, to being depressed about missing out on Embiid.

Joy turning to ashes in my mouth.


We have the #2 pick in one of the deepest drafts in recent memory. These kids have so much growing up to do, basketball to play, workouts to complete, injuries to get thru, that they're hardly even close to their finished product.

It would be nice if we could possess a crystal ball and see what the future holds, but let's not act like it's Embiid and a bunch of scrubs. We're going to have a chance at getting a very, very good player.


Very true. You never know.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,688
And1: 3,280
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#843 » by Licensed to Il » Sat May 24, 2014 10:29 pm

While we are on the topic of Wiggins becoming a likely 2 guard, I think it is pretty obvious that (offensively) Jabari Parker is a prototype 3: a classic, iso, powerful wing scorer in the mold of Carmello Anthony or Bernard King. I understand coach K played him at center, and that he is a good rebounder and you want to keep those guys close to the basket, and that he was pudgy and a poor perimeter defender. But whoever drafts Jabari is going to be getting an elite scorer who can shoot off screens and pin downs, create off the dribble, and play out of the post. Generally a do it all small forward (on the offensive end). Sure defense will be an adventure when he has to guard those types. But for everyone calling him a tweener, I hate that label. On offense he is a prototype 3.
User avatar
Zeezprah
Analyst
Posts: 3,539
And1: 1,569
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#844 » by Zeezprah » Sat May 24, 2014 10:32 pm

Villanoeyebrows wrote:While we are on the topic of Wiggins becoming a likely 2 guard, I think it is pretty obvious that (offensively) Jabari Parker is a prototype 3: a classic, iso, powerful wing scorer in the mold of Carmello Anthony or Bernard King. I understand coach K played him at center, and that he is a good rebounder and you want to keep those guys close to the basket, and that he was pudgy and a poor perimeter defender. But whoever drafts Jabari is going to be getting an elite scorer who can shoot off screens and pin downs, create off the dribble, and play out of the post. Generally a do it all small forward (on the offensive end). Sure defense will be an adventure when he has to guard those types. But for everyone calling him a tweener, I hate that label. On offense he is a prototype 3.


offense isn't the end of the floor position matters

it's defensively. and if he wants to play a 3, he's going to have to cut up, no doubt about it.
User avatar
cinematographer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,754
And1: 1,697
Joined: Feb 22, 2013

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#845 » by cinematographer » Sat May 24, 2014 10:39 pm

Problem with prototypes is they came about when the game was played differently.
pilprin
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 12, 2002

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#846 » by pilprin » Sat May 24, 2014 10:41 pm

I know everyone love Giannis, but regardless...you have to take the best talent and worry about adjustments later. I feel that way about every player on the roster. All are replaceable.
User avatar
El Pooch Grande
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,552
And1: 941
Joined: Mar 12, 2010
Location: Green Bay, WI (Titletown, USA)
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#847 » by El Pooch Grande » Sat May 24, 2014 10:44 pm

JayMKE wrote:
Zeezprah wrote:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q09bqfSw9Lo[/youtube]



average athlete my ass



:love:
Image

"We are the Champions, my friends"
craig
Senior
Posts: 729
And1: 129
Joined: Jul 26, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#848 » by craig » Sat May 24, 2014 11:40 pm



Thanks, those are good reports. I think we're going to be very happy with whichever one we take. Two very talented players who should enjoy very productive NBA careers.
User avatar
Finn
Starter
Posts: 2,368
And1: 2,614
Joined: Aug 14, 2009
       

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#849 » by Finn » Sat May 24, 2014 11:49 pm

JayMKE wrote:Simmons is a hack.

Spondylolisthesis sounds ****** up.

Very late to the party. I'm no NBA prospect, rather a short,fat engineer. But I do have a "spondy". It's no fun. Haven't had normal feeling in my left foot for over 5 years. Periodic back pain & sciatica. Not a candidate for a surgical correction due to some other unrelated medical issues. Unless the Bucks have a top notch orthopedic guy take a look at Embiid, I pass.
randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,394
And1: 7,339
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#850 » by randy84 » Sun May 25, 2014 12:02 am

Villanoeyebrows wrote:I guarantee that Kwame could do everything that Embiid did in that video. I would imagine that a whole lot of other busts could too. The thing that sets Embiid apart in my eyes from other great physical specimens are that he has a body of work (albeit just one year) in a good conference where he displayed touch, finesse, and incredible improvement. I find Embiid super impressive. But not based off of dunking in the paint with no defenders. That doesn't really distinguish him from any other high end prospect.


Wiggins is closer to Kwame than Embiid is.

Kwame had questions about his motivation and work ethic. His athleticism was never questioned.

Who does that sound like?
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,393
And1: 15,165
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#851 » by Ayt » Sun May 25, 2014 12:38 am

Finn wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Simmons is a hack.

Spondylolisthesis sounds ****** up.

Very late to the party. I'm no NBA prospect, rather a short,fat engineer. But I do have a "spondy". It's no fun. Haven't had normal feeling in my left foot for over 5 years. Periodic back pain & sciatica. Not a candidate for a surgical correction due to some other unrelated medical issues. Unless the Bucks have a top notch orthopedic guy take a look at Embiid, I pass.


I was diagnosed with spondylolisthesis in college. I have stretches I do basically everyday to take care of it for the most part. I've done physical therapy a couple different times for it over the years. I also have have issues with tightness, pain, and sciatica at times if I'm not diligent about it. Even right now while I'm typing this I'm aware of a vague sense of numbness down my right side from my lower back down to my toes which I think I've learned to just block out a lot of the time (or just accept as normal). My right hip in particular can get really tight which can lead to all sorts of other issues if I don't stretch it out. My hamstrings are basically permanently tight. I definitely favor putting my weight on my left leg when I'm just standing around because that seems to be my good side, so to speak.

Mine injury came from football. I wish I never would have played that **** sport since my favorite sports to play were always baseball and basketball anyway. I basically bowed to peer pressure and decided to play and ended up **** up my back permanently because of it.

I've never looked into surgery, but I probably should. It is a constant annoyance.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,075
And1: 4,202
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#852 » by DanoMac » Sun May 25, 2014 1:14 am

randy84 wrote:
Villanoeyebrows wrote:I guarantee that Kwame could do everything that Embiid did in that video. I would imagine that a whole lot of other busts could too. The thing that sets Embiid apart in my eyes from other great physical specimens are that he has a body of work (albeit just one year) in a good conference where he displayed touch, finesse, and incredible improvement. I find Embiid super impressive. But not based off of dunking in the paint with no defenders. That doesn't really distinguish him from any other high end prospect.


Wiggins is closer to Kwame than Embiid is.

Kwame had questions about his motivation and work ethic. His athleticism was never questioned.

Who does that sound like?


That "Wiggins is closer to Kwame than Embiid is" makes no sense at all. None.

When has Wiggins motivation and work ethic ever been questioned? Those 2 things are much different than lacking aggressiveness, which, I think is greatly overblown.
randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,394
And1: 7,339
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#853 » by randy84 » Sun May 25, 2014 1:24 am

DanoMac wrote:
randy84 wrote:
Villanoeyebrows wrote:I guarantee that Kwame could do everything that Embiid did in that video. I would imagine that a whole lot of other busts could too. The thing that sets Embiid apart in my eyes from other great physical specimens are that he has a body of work (albeit just one year) in a good conference where he displayed touch, finesse, and incredible improvement. I find Embiid super impressive. But not based off of dunking in the paint with no defenders. That doesn't really distinguish him from any other high end prospect.


Wiggins is closer to Kwame than Embiid is.

Kwame had questions about his motivation and work ethic. His athleticism was never questioned.

Who does that sound like?


That "Wiggins is closer to Kwame than Embiid is" makes no sense at all. None.

When has Wiggins motivation and work ethic ever been questioned? Those 2 things are much different than lacking aggressiveness, which, I think is greatly overblown.


Wiggins himself said he is not as motivated against lesser opponents.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,489
And1: 25,692
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#854 » by Baddy Chuck » Sun May 25, 2014 1:40 am

randy84 wrote:Wiggins himself said he is not as motivated against lesser opponents.

Would love to see that quote.

Edit - Think I found it, and I'd have to imagine his opinion has changed from the time his high school team was beating up teams by 50 points to now.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,868
And1: 5,646
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#855 » by drew881 » Sun May 25, 2014 2:02 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
randy84 wrote:Wiggins himself said he is not as motivated against lesser opponents.

Would love to see that quote.

Edit - Think I found it, and I'd have to imagine his opinion has changed from the time his high school team was beating up teams by 50 points to now.


Plus he won't have the problem of lesser opponents if he is on the Bucks!
User avatar
tonyreyes123
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 827
Joined: Nov 20, 2009
Location: Lower Eastside
   

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#856 » by tonyreyes123 » Sun May 25, 2014 2:03 am

I'm starting to warm up on Parker for this Bucks team. Wiggins has the highest chance of being a bust imo.
Bucks tricked me into being a diehard in 2001, LeBron is the 2nd best player ever, and pizza is awesome.
User avatar
PkrsBcksGphsMqt
RealGM
Posts: 18,827
And1: 1,417
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Madison
   

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#857 » by PkrsBcksGphsMqt » Sun May 25, 2014 2:04 am

I'm playing catch up in this thread, but I totally see the similarities in Embiid and Ewing. I think that's the best comparison I've seen. The dunks in the video below are very reminiscent of the types of dunks Embiid throws down. They both have better shots than you'd expect as well. I haven't seen Ewing highlights in forever, hard to believe that dude never broke through and won a championship. I also long for the days of 5-8 legit hall of fame centers playing in the NBA at the same time.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgI0YCVse9U[/youtube]
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,394
And1: 7,339
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#858 » by randy84 » Sun May 25, 2014 2:05 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
randy84 wrote:Wiggins himself said he is not as motivated against lesser opponents.

Would love to see that quote.

Edit - Think I found it, and I'd have to imagine his opinion has changed from the time his high school team was beating up teams by 50 points to now.


Possibly. All I said was that the questions that surrounded Kwame Brown coming out of high school are the same questions people had about Wiggins coming out of high school.

Doesn't mean they are the same player. Doesn't mean they will turn out the same.

But to compare the questions about Embiid to Brown makes way less sense than comparing Wiggins to Brown.

The question with Embiid is physical, his back. The question with Parker is athleticism. The question with Wiggins is his motivation.

If one of these guys bust, it will be because of these questions.
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,868
And1: 5,646
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#859 » by drew881 » Sun May 25, 2014 2:16 am

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:I'm playing catch up in this thread, but I totally see the similarities in Embiid and Ewing. I think that's the best comparison I've seen. The dunks in the video below are very reminiscent of the types of dunks Embiid throws down. They both have better shots than you'd expect as well. I haven't seen Ewing highlights in forever, hard to believe that dude never broke through and won a championship. I also long for the days of 5-8 legit hall of fame centers playing in the NBA at the same time.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgI0YCVse9U[/youtube]


Yep, I just posted the same video 3 pages back. It isn't just that they dunk the same way, but also how they move and jump. They don't really jump UP, but move float horizontally in the paint when they make their moves toward the rim.
User avatar
Be Here Now
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 443
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Location: Fire Horts
     

Re: Ford Mock 6.0 #2 Embiid 

Post#860 » by Be Here Now » Sun May 25, 2014 5:29 am

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the "anonymous scouts" in RR's column are philly guys. Trashing wiggins in hopes the bucks pass on him. They're basically on the same tier of Prospects in IMO. Doesn't make any sense that they'd be so down on wiggins when they each have glaring flaws.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:Gooden to me...is a rock.

He is the one player I wish was healthy all year but I do not complain about it. You can't control that so why cry?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks