ImageImage

Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably.

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

driese0824
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 02, 2012

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2101 » by driese0824 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:42 pm

TroyD92 wrote:
driese0824 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:While I think Bledsoe is vastly overrated here, calling him a similar player to sessions is a huge insult.



Thats real gm 101 over rating the guys they like (middleton) and love (wonder who that can be...giannis) and under valuation the guys they hate tough there ....knight)


Go ahead and take Knight, and I'll take Giannis and we'll see who has a better career.



Not saying that I'm saying there are guys already on this board who think giannis will be an all star this year or is untouchable please .Never said knight was better just that he's under rated by guys who hate him
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,380
And1: 25,575
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2102 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:44 pm

There's very valid reasons not to like him.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,806
And1: 8,206
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2103 » by jakecronus8 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:45 pm

Knight was the classic garbage numbers on a garbage team guy last year. If he embraced the role of off the ball spot up shooter/defensive 6th man he'd be great at it. Problem being he has never been that guy and probably never will be.

Any contract that pays him more than 4-6 mil a season will be an overpay.
Do it for Chuck
driese0824
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 60
Joined: Jun 02, 2012

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2104 » by driese0824 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:10 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Knight was the classic garbage numbers on a garbage team guy last year. If he embraced the role of off the ball spot up shooter/defensive 6th man he'd be great at it. Problem being he has never been that guy and probably never will be.

Any contract that pays him more than 4-6 mil a season will be an overpay.



So if knight improves this year n puts up 18/8/6 your excuse will be garbage stats on a bad team but if your god giannis does it or anybody not named knight that lame excuse won't be used.Instead it will be how great that player was.
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2105 » by MiltownHawkeye » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:23 pm

driese0824 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Knight was the classic garbage numbers on a garbage team guy last year. If he embraced the role of off the ball spot up shooter/defensive 6th man he'd be great at it. Problem being he has never been that guy and probably never will be.

Any contract that pays him more than 4-6 mil a season will be an overpay.



So if knight improves this year n puts up 18/8/6 your excuse will be garbage stats on a bad team but if your god giannis does it or anybody not named knight that lame excuse won't be used.Instead it will be how great that player was.

If Knight puts up 18/8/6 on good efficiency next season it will blow everything anyone thought of him until that point out of the water. Let us know when it happens and we'll re-evaluate
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
chonestown
General Manager
Posts: 9,563
And1: 13,403
Joined: Mar 13, 2010

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2106 » by chonestown » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:23 pm

driese0824 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Knight was the classic garbage numbers on a garbage team guy last year. If he embraced the role of off the ball spot up shooter/defensive 6th man he'd be great at it. Problem being he has never been that guy and probably never will be.

Any contract that pays him more than 4-6 mil a season will be an overpay.



So if knight improves this year n puts up 18/8/6 your excuse will be garbage stats on a bad team but if your god giannis does it or anybody not named knight that lame excuse won't be used.Instead it will be how great that player was.


Have a feeling that excuse won't have to be used.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,380
And1: 25,575
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2107 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:38 pm

Knight arguments always end with "Yeah, well what if he comes back a lot better then he's shown to be". We'll call it Brandon Jennings syndrome. Just one year away from putting it together.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,307
And1: 7,452
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2108 » by coolhandluke121 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:39 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Knight was the classic garbage numbers on a garbage team guy last year. If he embraced the role of off the ball spot up shooter/defensive 6th man he'd be great at it. Problem being he has never been that guy and probably never will be.

Any contract that pays him more than 4-6 mil a season will be an overpay.


Yep. I have little doubt that Mario Chalmers will be able to put up 18+ on dubious efficiency if Wade doesn't come back and he's the 2nd option. Doesn't mean he's not a terrible starting pg. That kind of comparison should help put things in perspective.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
BUCKSFORLIFE
Banned User
Posts: 486
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2109 » by BUCKSFORLIFE » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:44 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:Sessions shot 28% from three last season. Bledsoe shot 36% on twice as many attempts per game. Similar shooting.

Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts
User avatar
Aaron It Out
General Manager
Posts: 8,804
And1: 3,101
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: Black Mercedes
     

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2110 » by Aaron It Out » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:46 pm

BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Sessions shot 28% from three last season. Bledsoe shot 36% on twice as many attempts per game. Similar shooting.

Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts


That's only if you count his 28 games with the Bucks. He shot 28% over the whole season. Again you and your lack of attention to detail.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
BUCKSFORLIFE
Banned User
Posts: 486
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2111 » by BUCKSFORLIFE » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:48 pm

theFireBlanket wrote:
BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:Ramon howver has averaged as high as 9 assists per page in his career.


But as time has gone on he continues to assist less. I was a huge fan of him in his first years as a Milwaukee Buck, especially year 1.

*But the way that he ran the point last year was only nice to watch in that it was better than watching Knight, especially in his first set of games. That went to the wayside, in favor of play that seemed indicative of chasing a contract. I don't care what the coaches orders were about driving, he overlooked a lot of passes that he seemed capable of making.


With the mess of an offensive system we had this past season, its no wonder players who can find a way to score did just that. I think Ramon is an organized system will do just fine and his assist total will go back up some.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,380
And1: 25,575
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2112 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:48 pm

BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Sessions shot 28% from three last season. Bledsoe shot 36% on twice as many attempts per game. Similar shooting.

Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts

You being incapable of reading stat charts is my favorite part about you.

Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2113 » by MiltownHawkeye » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:50 pm

Bledsoe might be twice as good as Sessions, but Sessions played 83 GAMES. Can't beat that kind of production.
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
BUCKSFORLIFE
Banned User
Posts: 486
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2114 » by BUCKSFORLIFE » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:53 pm

Aaron It Out wrote:
BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Sessions shot 28% from three last season. Bledsoe shot 36% on twice as many attempts per game. Similar shooting.

Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts


That's only if you count his 28 games with the Bucks. He shot 28% over the whole season. Again you and your lack of attention to detail.

The fact is he has improved his shooting which has allowed him to be more dangerous to drive and get into the paint or draw fouls which he is really good at. Secondly since it is 100% more likely we could resign him vs the 1% chance we have of signing Bledsoe, I would say why not? Can't you see how important the character of a player and his willingness to play in Milwaukee is important? It called OJ Mayo syndrome. Mayo doesnt want to be here so he got fat and lazy. We gave him big dollars which he also wanted but then realized he can be on vacation for 3 years. I say those who actually like Milwaukee and who can play should be coveted not scorned.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,380
And1: 25,575
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2115 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:57 pm

The only reason Ramon or guys like Delfino or Zaza would want to return is because we were/are willing to pay them the most money.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
BUCKSFORLIFE
Banned User
Posts: 486
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2116 » by BUCKSFORLIFE » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:59 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:Sessions shot 28% from three last season. Bledsoe shot 36% on twice as many attempts per game. Similar shooting.

Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts

You being incapable of reading stat charts is my favorite part about you.

Image


I can read them and these are the only stats that matter to me, what he did when he got more playing time vs being a backup coming off the bench cold. But hey what would know about that right?

2013–14 Milwaukee 28 12 32.5 .461 .357 .841 3.1 4.8 .6 .1 15.8
Career 467 127 25.8 .439 .311 .800 3 4.7 .8 .1 11.7
User avatar
JoeJohnson2two
Pro Prospect
Posts: 951
And1: 67
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Joe Johnson's closet
       

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2117 » by JoeJohnson2two » Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:59 pm

BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:
Aaron It Out wrote:
BUCKSFORLIFE wrote:Sessions shot 36% last year from three. I love how you twist facts


That's only if you count his 28 games with the Bucks. He shot 28% over the whole season. Again you and your lack of attention to detail.

The fact is he has improved his shooting which has allowed him to be more dangerous to drive and get into the paint or draw fouls which he is really good at. Secondly since it is 100% more likely we could resign him vs the 1% chance we have of signing Bledsoe, I would say why not? Can't you see how important the character of a player and his willingness to play in Milwaukee is important? It called OJ Mayo syndrome. Mayo doesnt want to be here so he got fat and lazy. We gave him big dollars which he also wanted but then realized he can be on vacation for 3 years. I say those who actually like Milwaukee and who can play should be coveted not scorned.

Image
"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." - Michael Jordan
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,380
And1: 25,575
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2118 » by Baddy Chuck » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:01 pm

"The only stats that matter are the ones that back up my argument."
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
JoeJohnson2two
Pro Prospect
Posts: 951
And1: 67
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Joe Johnson's closet
       

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2119 » by JoeJohnson2two » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:01 pm

Sessions is trash and should not be brought back. It's that simple.
"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." - Michael Jordan
BUCKSFORLIFE
Banned User
Posts: 486
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Bucks looking at Bledsoe, probably. 

Post#2120 » by BUCKSFORLIFE » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:01 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:The only reason Ramon or guys like Delfino or Zaza would want to return is because we were/are willing to pay them the most money.


That is simply not true. All these players said they enjoy the city of Milwaukee. I just love how you make things up LOL

Return to Milwaukee Bucks