jazzfan1971 wrote:I think there are some 'non' question marks as well.
Calderon's defense
Barg's affect on the floor
A jumble at SG.
A PF who you folks seem to be counting on that struggles to keep healthy
Seriously. If I was an opposing player I'd be licking my chops to match up against the Knicks. That's looks to my eye to be the least functional defense in the league. You'll score some, Melo will see to that, but, I think more nights than not you will be giving up more points than you score.
I don't consider myself a Knicks hater in the least. A Laker hater, yes. A Knicks hater? Why would I bother? There is no bad blood there that I know of. I wish you the best of luck this season and I even think there is an outside shot you capture that 8th seed. (I'm guessing the 9th seed though, understand that my seed projection is separate from Floppymoose's projected wins projection, the two aren't related)
You guys seem to be putting a lot of stock into a player (Bargs) that has historically had a negative impact on the floor receiving a lot of time. We're telling you that he was brought in as much for WHAT he was (a CAA client) and what his contract was (clearing Novak in 2016) as for what he might bring.
If he brings nothing, what makes you think he will stick in the lineup? What makes you think him and Amare will play together if that is an obviously unsuccessful lineup? Especially, when there are other options (Cole, Smith, Dally, maybe even Acy) that bring more positive net attributes.
The Knicks under PMFJB are not married to any one agency as they were in the past. They have no incentive to play players that aren't producing.






























