Toronto/SA/Philly

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Saul Goodman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,895
And1: 2,608
Joined: Feb 27, 2013
         

Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#1 » by Saul Goodman » Sun Oct 5, 2014 1:08 am

To San Antonio:
Tyler Hansbrough


San Antonio out:
Jeff Ayers
Corey Joseph


Toronto Out:
Tyler Hansbrough
Chuck Hayes
Landry Fields


Toronto In:
Luc Richard Mbah a moute
Jason Richardson



Philly out:
JRich
Mbah a Moute

Philly in:
Corey Joseph
Jeff Ayers
Chuck Hayes
landry fields



this deal frees a roster space for the raptors to pick up Stiesma and Jordan Hamilton

Philly gets a young guard itching for an opportunity

the Spurs get a hard nosed role player to add to their staggering depth
2016 GMAT Blazers

Howard/Nene/
Griffin/M.Leonard/T.Jones
Porter/Marc.Morris/J.Johnson
McCollum/Stauskas/Thompson/Seldon
Lillard/Bayless/DeColo
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,096
And1: 9,779
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#2 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Oct 5, 2014 1:24 am

We dont have a back up pg(Mills out till Feb) with this trade and the Spurs don't trade for trades sake... which this is.
User avatar
NashtyNas
RealGM
Posts: 10,261
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
       

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#3 » by NashtyNas » Sun Oct 5, 2014 7:02 am

Blame Rasho wrote:We dont have a back up pg(Mills out till Feb) with this trade and the Spurs don't trade for trades sake... which this is.


Can I kindly ask you to please keep up with the weekly updates in your signature?
I think it's important for everyone to know how knowledgeable the posters on the GB are and that can only happen if a not-so-logical poster as yourself updates their signature weekly to let us know about the recent happenings on the GB.

Thanks in advance! ;)

On topic, makes very little sense for the Sixers and Spurs. I'm sure the Raps would love it though..
Image

The underappreciated greats:
Image

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
slicedbread2
Analyst
Posts: 3,645
And1: 3,010
Joined: Jan 23, 2014

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#4 » by slicedbread2 » Sun Oct 5, 2014 7:23 am

Spurs won't do this. They need Corey for the time being as Patty thrills is out for the time being.

Raptors love this because they save themselves some money.

76ers boldly pass as they brought in LRMAM to be a mentor to Embiid since both are from Cameroon and he can help Embiid's transition to the NBA a lot better.
User avatar
franktony
Analyst
Posts: 3,604
And1: 1,492
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
         

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#5 » by franktony » Sun Oct 5, 2014 10:58 am

Pretty much what Rasho said

SA can't afford losing Joseph now with Mills out until FEB.
Shaq on Duncan:SA won because of TD, a guy I could never break.I could talk trash to Ewing, get in D-Rob's face, get a rise out of Mourning,but when I went at Tim he’d look at me like he was bored and say:“Hey,Shaq, watch this shot right off the glass.”
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,079
And1: 10,305
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#6 » by the_process » Sun Oct 5, 2014 11:59 am

What if it was just Hayes, Fields, and Ross for McDaniels and JRich? Saves 8m and gets TOR a defensive stopper at the 3 spot.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
User avatar
chuckdevlin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,404
And1: 10,187
Joined: Jul 30, 2013
Location: Brampton
Contact:
 

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#7 » by chuckdevlin » Sun Oct 5, 2014 2:29 pm

Only reason we do this is to save a roster spot.

Would not do
Retire Joey Graham's Number in the ACC #letsgooo #whatnumber?
User avatar
chuckdevlin
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,404
And1: 10,187
Joined: Jul 30, 2013
Location: Brampton
Contact:
 

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#8 » by chuckdevlin » Sun Oct 5, 2014 2:31 pm

oyoyer wrote:What if it was just Hayes, Fields, and Ross for McDaniels and JRich? Saves 8m and gets TOR a defensive stopper at the 3 spot.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Yeah you know. Just throw our starting SF in the deal like that. For a 2nd round pick and a deadweight expiring.
You should get in touch with Masai and see how he feels about that.
Retire Joey Graham's Number in the ACC #letsgooo #whatnumber?
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,079
And1: 10,305
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#9 » by the_process » Sun Oct 5, 2014 4:27 pm

chuckdevlin wrote:
oyoyer wrote:What if it was just Hayes, Fields, and Ross for McDaniels and JRich? Saves 8m and gets TOR a defensive stopper at the 3 spot.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Yeah you know. Just throw our starting SF in the deal like that. For a 2nd round pick and a deadweight expiring.
You should get in touch with Masai and see how he feels about that.


Yes, because Hayes and Fields are SUCH productive players LMAO

If you want a win now improvement, I get that and in that case there's no version of the OP that will help TOR. If you want to dump useless players however, then this is your trade.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,796
And1: 7,771
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#10 » by jayjaysee » Sun Oct 5, 2014 4:45 pm

oyoyer wrote:
chuckdevlin wrote:
oyoyer wrote:What if it was just Hayes, Fields, and Ross for McDaniels and JRich? Saves 8m and gets TOR a defensive stopper at the 3 spot.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Yeah you know. Just throw our starting SF in the deal like that. For a 2nd round pick and a deadweight expiring.
You should get in touch with Masai and see how he feels about that.


Yes, because Hayes and Fields are SUCH productive players LMAO

If you want a win now improvement, I get that and in that case there's no version of the OP that will help TOR. If you want to dump useless players however, then this is your trade.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Ross is their starting SF... Fields and Hayes are their 11-12 men (ish) and the Raptors are not over the tax. So why would they possibly give up a real asset of any sort for cap savings? And if they did consider giving up an asset, why would it be one of their 5 starters?

Any reasoning?

But - on the OP - Raptors should do it every time. Trim a few million and a roster spot while getting back potentially equal/better talent.. Who knows what Richardson actually looks like on the court. He isn't that old and has taken over a year off for the injury.. He might be the same "eh" he was before his injury - after his prime.. Which is a huge improvement over Fields... But even that is just upgrading the Raptors 4th wing (Demar/Ross/Lou).. But the roster spot might give way for a better back up center some how.. I don't know.
User avatar
bigmean
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,806
And1: 133
Joined: Nov 19, 2001
Location: Yardley, Pa

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#11 » by bigmean » Sun Oct 5, 2014 4:50 pm

i love psycho t on the spurs could be a very useful role player for them
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,927
And1: 3,402
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#12 » by Mr Swagtastic » Sun Oct 5, 2014 5:12 pm

Good deal all around in my opinion gives The Spurs a gritty PF they need and gives the 76ers a decent PG prospect in Joseph who might be a decent pickup for them.

Toronto could add a sweater like say a 2nd but if we do this deal I expect Hamilton to be cut. Our roster would be pretty deep after

PG: Lowry/Vasquez/Cherry
SG: DeRozan/Williams/J-Rich
SF: Ross/J Johnson/J-Rich
PF: Amir/Patterson/Johnson
C: Jonas V/Steimsma/Bebe

Not to bad and gives us a boat load of expiring deals we could package with a pick this year or next for a upgrade at the 4

Sent from my SM-N900W8 using RealGM Forums mobile app
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,096
And1: 9,779
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#13 » by Blame Rasho » Sun Oct 5, 2014 6:07 pm

I_Socrates wrote:
Blame Rasho wrote:We dont have a back up pg(Mills out till Feb) with this trade and the Spurs don't trade for trades sake... which this is.


Can I kindly ask you to please keep up with the weekly updates in your signature?
I think it's important for everyone to know how knowledgeable the posters on the GB are and that can only happen if a not-so-logical poster as yourself updates their signature weekly to let us know about the recent happenings on the GB.

Thanks in advance! ;)

On topic, makes very little sense for the Sixers and Spurs. I'm sure the Raps would love it though..


Hehehe.... I am going to make it a point to update it weekly when the season starts.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,907
And1: 15,082
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#14 » by Laimbeer » Sun Oct 5, 2014 6:18 pm

I_Socrates wrote:
Blame Rasho wrote:We dont have a back up pg(Mills out till Feb) with this trade and the Spurs don't trade for trades sake... which this is.


Can I kindly ask you to please keep up with the weekly updates in your signature?
I think it's important for everyone to know how knowledgeable the posters on the GB are and that can only happen if a not-so-logical poster as yourself updates their signature weekly to let us know about the recent happenings on the GB.

Thanks in advance! ;)

On topic, makes very little sense for the Sixers and Spurs. I'm sure the Raps would love it though..


I believe a Rubio>Curry comment was made in this forum as well.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,079
And1: 10,305
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#15 » by the_process » Sun Oct 5, 2014 9:18 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
oyoyer wrote:
chuckdevlin wrote:
Yeah you know. Just throw our starting SF in the deal like that. For a 2nd round pick and a deadweight expiring.
You should get in touch with Masai and see how he feels about that.


Yes, because Hayes and Fields are SUCH productive players LMAO

If you want a win now improvement, I get that and in that case there's no version of the OP that will help TOR. If you want to dump useless players however, then this is your trade.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Ross is their starting SF... Fields and Hayes are their 11-12 men (ish) and the Raptors are not over the tax. So why would they possibly give up a real asset of any sort for cap savings? And if they did consider giving up an asset, why would it be one of their 5 starters?

Any reasoning?

But - on the OP - Raptors should do it every time. Trim a few million and a roster spot while getting back potentially equal/better talent.. Who knows what Richardson actually looks like on the court. He isn't that old and has taken over a year off for the injury.. He might be the same "eh" he was before his injury - after his prime.. Which is a huge improvement over Fields... But even that is just upgrading the Raptors 4th wing (Demar/Ross/Lou).. But the roster spot might give way for a better back up center some how.. I don't know.


The OP is bad for Philly and they wouldn't do it is what I was saying, so I was trying to figure another way to let TOR dump their bad contracts, which is obviously the goal of the OP here. The Raptors would move Ross because... I assume they aren't trading the Knicks pick they own or Valanciunas so they have no other way to dump that 12m. Again, I get the fact they want to win now and don't know exactly what dumping those salaries would do for them, just going off the OP deal.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
WhatsaTDot
RealGM
Posts: 11,284
And1: 7,221
Joined: May 16, 2010
Location: ♫ Whoa Black Betty Shambleland ♫

Re: Toronto/SA/Philly 

Post#16 » by WhatsaTDot » Sun Oct 5, 2014 9:50 pm

oyoyer wrote:What if it was just Hayes, Fields, and Ross for McDaniels and JRich? Saves 8m and gets TOR a defensive stopper at the 3 spot.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Which of the players the Raptors are receiving is the defensive stopper?
Image

This place is insufferable.

Return to Trades and Transactions