Bucks Uniform and Logo Concept Art

0BobLobLaw0 · Post #1681 » by **0BobLobLaw0** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 8:41 pm

Miasma wrote:Since nothing is going on, I re-visted a couple that were discussed this past summer here.

I'd be ok with number one if we're going to be taking the 'tough deer' route. I'm a retro fan at heart, though.

very nice. I dont like the B and the S being bigger on Bucks, but overall very nice.

SkilesTheLimit · Post #1682 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 8:46 pm

I'm sick of the mounted deer head look. I'd go the route of a fierce and sleek profile view of a buck.

Badgerlander · Post #1683 » by **Badgerlander** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 8:58 pm

I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

VooDoo7 · Post #1684 » by **VooDoo7** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 9:23 pm

DocHoliday wrote:I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

I'd be quite surprised if they did that.

This is a new era. I think the new owners will want something that represents that, not something from the Kohl era. Not to mention, new logo= more merchandise sales.

VooDoo7 · Post #1685 » by **VooDoo7** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 9:25 pm

Miasma wrote:Since nothing is going on, I re-visted a couple that were discussed this past summer here.

I'd be ok with number one if we're going to be taking the 'tough deer' route. I'm a retro fan at heart, though.

The top logo is obviously a tweak to our current logo. And while it looks much better, I still think it's too similar to our current one. The bottom logo looks terrible IMO. Those antlers look like flames or something.

Badgerlander · Post #1686 » by **Badgerlander** » Tue Jan 6, 2015 9:30 pm

VooDoo7 wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

I'd be quite surprised if they did that.

This is a new era. I think the new owners will want something that represents that, not something from the Kohl era. Not to mention, new logo= more merchandise sales.

I mean you could make the rack a little suggestive and make the triangle below it furry

make the ball orange and black and voilà all new, lol, but seriously a lot of teams have gone away from any kind of prominent primary logo on their uniforms. It's mostly just secondary logos on the shorts these days.

Floating_Labels · Post #1687 » by **Floating_Labels** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 7:25 am

Just a crazy thought but how cool would it be if Tampa Bay and Milwaukee made a teamname trade. It would be Tampa Bay Bucks and Milwaukee Buccaneers. both just have a better ring to it imo. We all know wisconsinites retire to florida anyways so they could totally ham it up with the hunting aspect and Buccaneers can be pretty intimidating as well. I think it would be cool as hell to have a pirate ship in the new arena!

Cooleyo47 · Post #1688 » by **Cooleyo47** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 3:49 pm

DocHoliday wrote:I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

I've noticed they are definitely using the secondary logo in place of the primary anywhere they can.

BobbyLight · Post #1689 » by **BobbyLight** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 3:58 pm

Cooleyo47 wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

I've noticed they are definitely using the secondary logo in place of the primary anywhere they can.

Because it's so stupidly expensive for a team to change its logo (I want to say it's $500k to change a primary logo) a lot of teams will create a kick ass secondary logo and use that almost exclusively. Good example is Atlanta which brought back the Pac Man logo and made it it's more prominent logo this year.

We obviously didn't make our secondary logo new, but it's clearly been the focus this year.

Badgerlander · Post #1690 » by **Badgerlander** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 4:07 pm

If the Hawks can have a Tinder night I think the Bucks should have a Big Rack night sponsored by Hooters.

Miasma · Post #1691 » by **Miasma** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 8:14 pm

Was browsing tattoo and art pics...lots of bad ones. First one's ok, but it's like a hybrid Bucks and UWM Panthers. It did open my eyes to the different ways a Buck logo could be done.

Can't deny the $wag of this

MadBlueEdwards · Post #1692 » by **MadBlueEdwards** » Wed Jan 7, 2015 9:26 pm

DocHoliday wrote:If the Hawks can have a Tinder night

Did they really do that?

ColeWorld23 · Post #1693 » by **ColeWorld23** » Thu Jan 8, 2015 11:04 pm

This might be a hint towards the future

blazza18 · Post #1694 » by **blazza18** » Thu Jan 8, 2015 11:08 pm

Yea, I think it's pretty obvious what our new colour scheme will be. I like it.

trwi7 · Post #1695 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 8, 2015 11:10 pm

DocHoliday wrote:the rack and balls secondary

Hey Bucks fans, come check out our rack and balls!

ColeWorld23 · Post #1696 » by **ColeWorld23** » Thu Jan 8, 2015 11:14 pm

Cooleyo47 wrote:
DocHoliday wrote:I bet that they go with no primary logo and stick with the rack and balls secondary

I've noticed they are definitely using the secondary logo in place of the primary anywhere they can.

Most likely because they're picking the lesser evil of the two logos. The primary logo is hideous.

Sky Bucks · Post #1697 » by **Sky Bucks** » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:53 am

IMO there are a lot of NBA logos that were much better in the past than in the present and milwaukee is one of them

trwi7 · Post #1698 » by **trwi7** » Fri Jan 9, 2015 3:53 am

Change the black to forest green. :eyebrows:

VooDoo7 · Post #1699 » by **VooDoo7** » Fri Jan 9, 2015 4:47 am

ColeWorld23 wrote:This might be a hint towards the future

Seriously, these need to be the colors. Maybe a hint of tan/wheat in there somewhere? Or silver.

BMatt07 · Post #1700 » by **BMatt07** » Fri Jan 9, 2015 1:32 pm

VooDoo7 wrote:
ColeWorld23 wrote:This might be a hint towards the future

Seriously, these need to be the colors. Maybe a hint of tan/wheat in there somewhere? Or silver.

No... just no. Green and white is perfect as is.