tiderulz wrote:
yep, as a rookie being forced to play PG. I'll give him a bit of a break there. And he was a good, not great but good shooter in college. And his best games this year, when the ball was primarily controlled by Elf so that he could just attack as a SG and not have to think too much. And Harris has been a 40% 3 pt shooter this year, how is that not consistent?
Because he shot a horrible 26% last year and is 31% over his career. Or are we just ignoring that because it helps your argument!??????????????????
As for Gordon, again, as i said we just dont know what his offense will be. But watching practice film of him, he shoots better than his reputation.
Which means nothing, MCW made i think 15 3 point shots in a row in training sesh, don't mean he'll become a great 3 point shooter.
You keep saying Harris isnt a great 3 pt shooter, he doesnt have to be great, but he is good and has gotten better each year. Do you forget he is just 22, younger than Dipo even. He wasnt healthy all year last year, but shot near 38% from 3 when he finally got healthy.Durant wasnt a great 3 pt shooter his first 4 years either.
I keep saying it because he's not!
31% is not even considered good, that's his career stat which is a better sample size. Comparing Tobias Harris to durant won't even be entertained. As i said, i don't understand why Harris is a poor 3 point shooter considering his form , however fact is he's not. Can he improve!? yes................maybe. i think he'll eventually reach a high 30's % from 3pt range, however it'll be something that is a compliment to his skillset as oppose to part of his skillset. In other words, it'll never be his go to bread and butter.
And dont discount bad coaching for the team and the fact they are one of the youngest teams in the league. It took Washington about 4 years with Wall/Beal/etc to start winning. OKC had Durant/Westbrook/Ibaka/Harden and still took a couple of years until they had a winning record. Not calling Orlando a contender, but they can easily develop more and get better, especially with a real coach.
There are 100 of excuses that can be made as to why Orlando is not a good team record wise with all their talent. However one thing i notice is you continue to compare your team to other teams/players that quite frankly are unique. There's not Wall or Bradley beal type player on Orlando, there's not Durant , westbrook, harden or ibaka on Orlando's team. and just in case, there's no lebron.
The problem i see with your POV is that your hoping some of your players develop into players that they aren't.