Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

[Nowak008]

Interesting forum you've got here.

Best on RealGM and don't you **** forget

[TroyD92]

I thought we'd be absorbing Granger too? Or was that wrong?

[RKL]

What you said still makes no sense.

How so? Parker's value with a torn ACL is equivalent to Parker's value before torn ACL?

I'm not arguing that point I'm just not sure how Parker was brought into the conversation. We were talking about Giannis.

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

[TroyD92]

How so? Parker's value with a torn ACL is equivalent to Parker's value before torn ACL?

I'm not arguing that point I'm just not sure how Parker was brought into the conversation. We were talking about Giannis.

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Ahhh I got ya. I agree he could put up similar raw numbers as Giannis. I doubt he'd have anywhere near the impact Giannis does though.

[TroyD92]

How so? Parker's value with a torn ACL is equivalent to Parker's value before torn ACL?

I'm not arguing that point I'm just not sure how Parker was brought into the conversation. We were talking about Giannis.

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Ahhh I got ya. I agree he could put up similar raw numbers as Giannis. I doubt he'd have anywhere near the impact Giannis does though.

[Rapaz]

^^^ This guy remembered to Fan Up!

I sure did.

All this nonsense aside, I really didn't think that one " " would generate such passionate anger, especially in response to someone's suggestion that absorbing $2.1M could land your team a first-round pick . . . .

Interesting forum you've got here.

Basically, get your hand off it. You came to our forum, offered nothing of substance, then are trying to act like some sort of moral warrior when the expected response comes. I'm happy to discuss trades with you if you are to provide something of substance. To clarify, that is not an emoticon.

You're absolutely right. Next time I'll express in words what I hoped to communicate through that malicious, no-good, spiteful emoticon: your trade proposal is unrealistic; please reconsider.

<--- This emoticon is meant to express contrition. My sincerest apologies if it reads some other way.

And don't worry, Nowak008, your forum will always have a special place in my heart.

[Dcebucks11]

How so? Parker's value with a torn ACL is equivalent to Parker's value before torn ACL?

I'm not arguing that point I'm just not sure how Parker was brought into the conversation. We were talking about Giannis.

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Giannis would prob average 15/8/3 on the lakers this yr.

[TroyD92]

I sure did.

All this nonsense aside, I really didn't think that one " " would generate such passionate anger, especially in response to someone's suggestion that absorbing $2.1M could land your team a first-round pick . . . .

Interesting forum you've got here.

Basically, get your hand off it. You came to our forum, offered nothing of substance, then are trying to act like some sort of moral warrior when the expected response comes. I'm happy to discuss trades with you if you are to provide something of substance. To clarify, that is not an emoticon.

You're absolutely right. Next time I'll express in words what I hoped to communicate through that malicious, no-good, spiteful emoticon: your trade proposal is unrealistic; please reconsider.

<--- This emoticon is meant to express contrition. My sincerest apologies if it reads some other way.

And don't worry, Nowak008, your forum will always have a special place in my heart.

The trade was Granger and Cole right? How is that unrealistic?

[Jez2983]

I sure did.

All this nonsense aside, I really didn't think that one " " would generate such passionate anger, especially in response to someone's suggestion that absorbing $2.1M could land your team a first-round pick . . . .

Interesting forum you've got here.

Basically, get your hand off it. You came to our forum, offered nothing of substance, then are trying to act like some sort of moral warrior when the expected response comes. I'm happy to discuss trades with you if you are to provide something of substance. To clarify, that is not an emoticon.

You're absolutely right. Next time I'll express in words what I hoped to communicate through that malicious, no-good, spiteful emoticon: your trade proposal is unrealistic; please reconsider.

<--- This emoticon is meant to express contrition. My sincerest apologies if it reads some other way.

And don't worry, Nowak008, your forum will always have a special place in my heart.

Well perhaps you should just keep your feelings to yourself. Best of luck in the run to the Playoffs. Except against us.

And again, happy for any counter-trade offers which are yet to be forthcoming.

[RKL]

I'm not arguing that point I'm just not sure how Parker was brought into the conversation. We were talking about Giannis.

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Ahhh I got ya. I agree he could put up similar raw numbers as Giannis. I doubt he'd have anywhere near the impact Giannis does though.

How can you be so certain if you have no proof.

Doubt Lakers/Bucks make any deals either way.

[VooDoo7]

I should be in bed. Instead, here I am scouring the internet looking for rumors, with NatGeo Wild on in the background, which is showing koala bears boning.

[TroyD92]

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Ahhh I got ya. I agree he could put up similar raw numbers as Giannis. I doubt he'd have anywhere near the impact Giannis does though.

How can you be so certain if you have no proof.

Doubt Lakers/Bucks make any deals either way.

I can't, but from what I saw of him at Kentucky he's got quite a few major flaws (as did Jabari). I'd agree though I don't see anything happening involving the two teams.

[tyland]

I should be in bed. Instead, here I am scouring the internet looking for rumors, with NatGeo Wild on in the background, which is showing koala bears boning.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB2y52jfRdc[/youtube]

[Dcebucks11]

True but was pointing out injury as something that stalled his value. Had he not gotten injured it'd be trending upward, certainly in a season where he'd be getting free run. I could see Randle averaging around Giannis' numbers (12/7) this season.

Ahhh I got ya. I agree he could put up similar raw numbers as Giannis. I doubt he'd have anywhere near the impact Giannis does though.

How can you be so certain if you have no proof.

Doubt Lakers/Bucks make any deals either way.

How could you be sure he averages 12/7? you can't.. It's a prediction..

Giannis is more skilled offensively, and on defense he's much better. Plus he's younger.

[VooDoo7]

Did you guys know that 90% of the koala population is infected with chlamydia?

[blazza18]

Lof of herp derp the last few pages.

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk

We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and Granger

Spoiler:

Lineup this year: (Think swapping Gibbson for Middleton keeps us even)

Cole/Jorge
Knight/Bayless/Stauskas
Giannis/Granger
Dudley/Martin
Gibson/Zaza

Lineup Next Year: (simply love it!!!!!)

Marshall/Bayless
Knight/Stauskas
Parker/Dudley
Giannis/Randle
Gibson/Zaza

#OwnTheFuture

*I know you guys want Middleton, but Lakers want more of a 3 and D

This mess takes the cake.

[tyland]

Did you guys know that 90% of the koala population is infected with chlamydia?

Which is also unequivocal proof that twir7 has visited Australia *the more you know*

[imithanos]

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=q7d2kuk

We also are getting a 2017 1st (lottery protected) for absorbing Cole and Granger


Lineup this year: (Think swapping Gibbson for Middleton keeps us even)

Cole/Jorge
Knight/Bayless/Stauskas
Giannis/Granger
Dudley/Martin
Gibson/Zaza

Lineup Next Year: (simply love it!!!!!)

Marshall/Bayless
Knight/Stauskas
Parker/Dudley
Giannis/Randle
Gibson/Zaza

#OwnTheFuture

*I know you guys want Middleton, but Lakers want more of a 3 and D

Really?? With Giannis, Parker and Dudley you want more forwards in the roster?? Not to mention you want to get rid Khris and play Knight as SG. But I can understand you on the latter; love is blind.

[Bucks_MacGyver]

So any rumors or we just throwing trade ideas for 10 months.....

[Badgerlander]

obviously not named after Chuck Norris