Ill-yasova wrote:That was just an example of something tangible we've seen with our own eyes. If we're talking about a players impact on wins I just don't see it with Henson either. I'm not saying Kanter is great or anything, I just think he's a little better than Henson. It's all subjective.
Henson is a better defender and if he had the same volume as Kanter he'd likely still have a higher TS. He's also cheap an extra year. Kanter is a box score stat player who puts up middling efficiency for a big (.535 TS). He also does not defend at all.