Giannis Parker wrote:DanoMac wrote:Anything over $10 mil for Knight is ugly so it will be ugly by default.
Knight is a quality #3 guy.
He's not though.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Giannis Parker wrote:DanoMac wrote:Anything over $10 mil for Knight is ugly so it will be ugly by default.
Knight is a quality #3 guy.
drew881 wrote:Bucks4Milwaukee wrote:drew881 wrote:I'll roll with Knight or Lawson before paying Dragic that. I'll be happy with our trade deadline if 1) we deal Ersan for an expiring or exception, 2) pick up someone like Taj without giving up too much, or 3) grab Lawson in exchange for one of our 1sts and Ersan. 4) I don't mind if we pull no trades, since we already did a bit to relieve ourselves of Sanders.
I wouldn't be happy if we stand pat. We got rid of sanders, now we can try and fill that position with a solid big to rebound and we could def upgrade somewhere in the point position.
We can do that next year. If the solution doesn't present itself this trade deadline, there is no reason to force it. I don't think Kanter is the answer, and Gibson is ok, but I'd rather see a large rebounding center that doesn't demand the ball and can play some defense…someone like Ben Wallace or Denis Rodman (obviously doesn't have to be as good) who isn't a focal point, but can do the dirty work would be what I'd like to see. Sanders wasn't even that guy, when it came down to it in terms of the rebounding.
DanoMac wrote:If I was running ****
Knight to Houston for Beverley, Terence Jones, and a 2nd (or Motiejunas).
Ersan, JOB, 2nd (or Ersan/Clippers 1st) to Sacramento for Stauskas and Thompson
mlloyd10 wrote:Something needs to happen
DanoMac wrote:Giannis Parker wrote:DanoMac wrote:Anything over $10 mil for Knight is ugly so it will be ugly by default.
Knight is a quality #3 guy.
He's not though.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:DanoMac wrote:Giannis Parker wrote:
Knight is a quality #3 guy.
He's not though.
right now, at age 23, on his rookie deal, hes the #1 guy, maaaybe #2... on a team that's probably going to win 50 games for the next 3-4 years as constructed. to declare hes not capable of being a #3 at his peak is doofy. at least wait until the team takes a little dive to not sound so petty.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
mlloyd10 wrote:Something needs to happen
machu46 wrote:I can't help but think that if we make a trade, it will be for someone we aren't hearing about yet, with the one exception possibly being Stauskas.
And the only way I could see us moving Middleton is if it were for a big-name guy that addresses a big need for us.
And no, I don't know anything at all; just a gut feeling.