Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

SkilesTheLimit · Post #6621 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:08 pm

BMatt07 wrote:
Nowak008 wrote:Ersan our 2015 1st + clips pick + 2nd round pick for Stauskas and Thompson. The Kings are nutz right now...this is a prime opportunity to steal a top 10 pick from a loaded draft class.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile appo

Lol two firsts for Stauskas? You must be trolling..

Stauskas himself isn't playing like a 1st rd pick this year.

I'm weary of his potential as a pro. But if you're telling me he can be had for Ersan, I'd buy.

VooDoo7 · Post #6622 » by **VooDoo7** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:09 pm

So if OKC trades Reggie for Lopez, they can afford to trade McGary. Maybe they'd want Knight to replace Jackson.

JayMKE · Post #6623 » by **JayMKE** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:10 pm

so nothing new this morning?

hey, whatever, nothing is better than something dumb

dedned · Post #6624 » by **dedned** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:10 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:
BMatt07 wrote:
Nowak008 wrote:Ersan our 2015 1st + clips pick + 2nd round pick for Stauskas and Thompson. The Kings are nutz right now...this is a prime opportunity to steal a top 10 pick from a loaded draft class.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile appo

Lol two firsts for Stauskas? You must be trolling..

Stauskas himself isn't playing like a 1st rd pick this year.

I'm weary of his potential as a pro. But if you're telling me he can be had for Ersan, I'd buy.

But potential. He was a top ten pick. We need more potential. More top ten picks and more potential. Potential gets you more top ten picks.

LUKE23 · Post #6625 » by **LUKE23** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:10 pm

Yeah, I'd be interested to see what it took for McGary if they get Lopez. I'd consider giving the Clips 1st for him.

KidA_24 · Post #6626 » by **KidA_24** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:11 pm

This is my favorite, albeit unrealistic, trade proposal: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=laahahy

Bucks get: Lawson, Nurkic
Nugs get: Knight, Henson, Ersan, Bucks 2015 1st, Clips 2017 1st

I don't think its enough for the Nuggets. Is there a way of getting there without including Jabannis?? Include Middleton? More picks?

M-C-G · Post #6627 » by **M-C-G** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:12 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Yeah, I'd be interested to see what it took for McGary if they get Lopez. I'd consider giving the Clips 1st for him.

If there fans are any indication, they would want what we want for Middleton...They are that high on him right now.

imithanos · Post #6628 » by **imithanos** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:12 pm

VooDoo7 wrote:So if OKC trades Reggie for Lopez, they can afford to trade McGary. Maybe they'd want Knight to replace Jackson.

Nah.. They would get themselves the same situation in the summer.

Post #6629 » by **ReasonablySober** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:13 pm

I honestly don't think that Clips pick has a ton of value.

Garden Of Edens · Post #6630 » by **Garden Of Edens** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:13 pm

So how can Okc afford Lopez? Could the Bucks then trade for Lopez since he was traded away from Brooklyn or are they not allowed to touch any Nets players for a certain amount of years

Badgerlander · Post #6631 » by **Badgerlander** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:14 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Yeah, I'd be interested to see what it took for McGary if they get Lopez. I'd consider giving the Clips 1st for him.

They might be in need of a back up PG at that point too, Bayless+Clips 1st for McGary+Lamb

JustinCredible · Post #6632 » by **JustinCredible** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:14 pm

It is looking like we will do nothing. Maybe take on a small contract if it comes with a high 2nd round pick to help a team (Knicks) get under the tax.

tski1972 · Post #6633 » by **tski1972** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:14 pm

Giannis Parker · Post #6634 » by **Giannis Parker** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:14 pm

Garden Of Edens wrote:So how can Okc afford Lopez? Could the Bucks then trade for Lopez since he was traded away from Brooklyn or are they not allowed to touch any Nets players for a certain amount of years

Pretty sure it is no deals with the Nets, not the players. Would be awfully hard to prove that the intent all along was not to trade Lopez to the Bucks and the Thunder just acted as a third party.

SkilesTheLimit · Post #6635 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:15 pm

Badgerlander wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Yeah, I'd be interested to see what it took for McGary if they get Lopez. I'd consider giving the Clips 1st for him.

They might be in need of a back up PG at that point too, Bayless+Clips 1st for McGary+Lamb

Would you take that if you were OKC?

No way in hell.

GHOSTofSIKMA · Post #6636 » by **GHOSTofSIKMA** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:15 pm

DanoMac wrote:
It's not realistic to explore trades for guys who are about enter RFA looking for a big contract? #2 or #3 scoring threat, you're absolutely right!

I'll propose as many trades as I like, especially on deadline day. Just because your favorite player is involved doesn't mean you need to get upset.

argue with fans that a guy isn't capable of being a #3.... and then on the same page of the same thread propose a deal with a contender asking for a monster return for their new #3.

Christ sakes... keep up the good work :roll:

Sauce Boss · Post #6637 » by **Sauce Boss** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:16 pm

KidA_24 wrote:This is my favorite, albeit unrealistic, trade proposal: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=laahahy

Bucks get: Lawson, Nurkic
Nugs get: Knight, Henson, Ersan, Bucks 2015 1st, Clips 2017 1st

I don't think its enough for the Nuggets. Is there a way of getting there without including Jabannis?? Include Middleton? More picks?

Nurkic is considered untouchable by Denver, much like how we consider Giannis untouchable. So there isn't much you can really do to make that trade feasible.

yoyomayoma · Post #6638 » by **yoyomayoma** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:16 pm

I really REALLY hope we don't trade for Lopez.

JayMKE · Post #6639 » by **JayMKE** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:16 pm

considering we were talking about Kanter and Reggie Jackson yesterday, this is the happiest I've ever been bored

M-C-G · Post #6640 » by **M-C-G** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:17 pm

That Brooklyn <> OKC deal is interesting, because it means that OKC is going to have to part with Dion, Collison or Morrow to get the deal done. All guys they just resigned or just acquired in Dion's case.

I'm guessing it looks something like

BKN IN: Perkins, Morrow, Lamb, Jackson

OKC IN: Lopez, Karasev, Anderson