ImageImageImageImageImage

Countdown to NBA Draft: Prospect Talk

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

MelosSoreWrist
Analyst
Posts: 3,534
And1: 1,565
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: Re: 

Post#4601 » by MelosSoreWrist » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:34 pm

Ron Mexico wrote:
bigfnjoe96 wrote:Doc, stop smoking the ganja....

Sent from my G2 via Tapatalk


gonna have to second this. we're talking about a hypothetical with virtually no chance of taking place.

he would trade down before that.

no spoilers: has anyone seen the movie draft day? kevin costner? i thought it was pretty good, in a cheesy kind of way.

That was what I was thinking when I was reading this thread. If PJackson has a note in his pocket that reads "Cauley Stein no matter what" we are in trouble.
NYK 455 wrote:
greenhughes wrote:I hope Melo leaves and wins a championship and rubs it all in our face.

How does that make you better than the Lin, Gallo, and Wil fans who root for them over NY?
siar617
Analyst
Posts: 3,079
And1: 457
Joined: May 11, 2009

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4602 » by siar617 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:50 pm

moocow007 wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:It's called maximizing resources. Yes, of course they can have Towns in a minimal role to start but that isn't maximizing resources IF the plan is to try to win in Anthony's prime...which is only another year or two.


a minimal role starting off on offense doesn't mean a minimal role on defense.

It means half a role.

No he can still shoot, pass, set picks, run fast break, hit free throws, run pick & roll and just generally move the ball within the offense.
siar617
Analyst
Posts: 3,079
And1: 457
Joined: May 11, 2009

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4603 » by siar617 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:51 pm

Half a role is play offense only and having no defensive awareness about you.
Johnny Hoops
RealGM
Posts: 12,635
And1: 2,212
Joined: Nov 28, 2005

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4604 » by Johnny Hoops » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:51 pm

I wouldn't mind WCS in a scenario where we select #1 or #2 and subsequently trade the pick for WCS and other assets.

Let's say the Kings drafted WCS and we had Towns. Phil knows we need multiple assets --- maybe we move Towns/Calderon for WCS/Collison/McLemore and future 1st from Kings.

We come out of the trade with a starting C and a new starting back-court. We add 2 more pieces in FA -- lets say we sign Monroe and T-Harris.

Collison/Galloway
McLemore/THJ
Melo/T-Harris
Monroe
WCS

At least in this scenario -- we are adding to our depth without spending on older FAs and we'd probably be leaving enough room to add a MAX player in 2016 and we'd also have a 2016 pick from Kings.

Not sure it's a great plan but one example.
NY2TheBay
General Manager
Posts: 8,487
And1: 4,164
Joined: Sep 28, 2010

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4605 » by NY2TheBay » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:57 pm

I feel real comfortable with Russell. After that Im rolling with Okafor. This is in terms of what I feel are the most for certain prospects.

Towns could be special but he'll have to do a lot of polishing on his game and sometimes when the money is flowing in and the competition is much better one can get gun shy.
Retired_Doc
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Location: *74* year old ex-New Yorker, now in Europe

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4606 » by Retired_Doc » Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:57 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:I wouldn't mind WCS in a scenario where we select #1 or #2 and subsequently trade the pick for WCS and other assets.

Let's say the Kings drafted WCS and we had Towns. Phil knows we need multiple assets --- maybe we move Towns/Calderon for WCS/Collison/McLemore and future 1st from Kings.

We come out of the trade with a starting C and a new starting back-court. We add 2 more pieces in FA -- lets say we sign Monroe and T-Harris.

Collison/Galloway
McLemore/THJ
Melo/T-Harris
Monroe
WCS

At least in this scenario -- we are adding to our depth without spending on older FAs and we'd probably be leaving enough room to add a MAX player in 2016 and we'd also have a 2016 pick from Kings.

Not sure it's a great plan but one example.


It's a very good plan, Johnny, but there are two problems: I'm not at all sure the Kings would take Calderon and I'm not so sure they would hand us their 2016 first rounder. They would sure have to consider Towns three times the player WCS is, and frankly Towns is not three times the player WCS is.
Tanking again, I suppose. Is there any other way?
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,798
And1: 15,303
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4607 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:01 pm

TrueWarrior wrote:
ibraheim718 wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:
For what its worth NBAdraft.net moved Towns from 4 to 1 on their mock yesterday. Jah from 1 to 3 with Russell at 2. Scouts are seeing the same things many of us are it seems.


:lol: Do you know how many scouts we alone have? Close to 10. Now multiply that by 30 NBA teams. Supposedly 2 scouts chose Towns.. and you word it like it's a referendum. If I might ask are you involved in politics? :lol:


Ha it's not just 2 scouts feller. You know this.


Nah.. what I do know is nobody knows. :lol: I would say right now.. it might have moved a little from a sure fire lock for Jah to maybe it depends on what team has #1 but I'm iffy on that whole situation. Portland drafted for fit when they chose Oden and how it turned out scared the ish out of everyone. I've went from "I'd be shocked" if anyone but Jah went #1 to "It wouldn't surprise me" if someone other than him went #1 with the disclaimer that GM's do stupid things all the time.

Bottom line.. when a player is that good at one thing and that one thing is putting the ball in the bucket you take him #1 and you worry about the other stuff later because you can make up the other stuff in so man different ways.

You got half these cats on here afraid to draft him because of what's happened in the past and to me that's an extremely ignorant way of looking at things. It's that battered wife syndrome rearing it's ugly head again. Then you got other cats wanting to draft Towns because he "fits" the city more.. Them same clowns would've passed on Tim Duncan. :lol:

Right now.. today.. he's the best player in the draft and it really ain't even close (maybe the guard can do something special in the tournament). He's played through injury, he's played heavy minutes, he's been game planned against, and he's played through adversity. You have #1 or we have #1 and you take him. I've even heard analysts say Philly would be stupid to pass on him with their plethora of bigs. What he does great is highly valuable and extremely rare in the league.. it's been keeping Zach Randolph's bank account full and he's the antithesis of this "modern" style of basketball y'all have been pushing. Well let me tell you another thing.. the NBA is constantly changing and I wouldn't be surprised if you start seeing more young kids coming up with strong back to the basket games from watching a kid like Jah play ball. It's a lost art form and quite frankly I'd like to see it return with us spearheading the movement. :o
god4gives
Banned User
Posts: 757
And1: 192
Joined: Dec 17, 2014

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4608 » by god4gives » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:08 pm

Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,798
And1: 15,303
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4609 » by ibraheim718 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:11 pm

Tron Carter wrote:
ibraheim718 wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:
For what its worth NBAdraft.net moved Towns from 4 to 1 on their mock yesterday. Jah from 1 to 3 with Russell at 2. Scouts are seeing the same things many of us are it seems.


:lol: Do you know how many scouts we alone have? Close to 10. Now multiply that by 30 NBA teams. Supposedly 2 scouts chose Towns.. and you word it like it's a referendum. If I might ask are you involved in politics? :lol:


i gotta say man i'm with you on your stance of rim protection being overrated. i think a good example i think is the clippers. jordan gets all the highlight blocks but 6 foot nothing cp3 is their most impactful defensive player.


The head of the snake my man.
Retired_Doc
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Location: *74* year old ex-New Yorker, now in Europe

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4610 » by Retired_Doc » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:11 pm

As many of you know I was on the Towns wagon for quite a few months and considered him a better pick than OK4. And I still do. BUT WCS sure had one fantastic tourney. If he plays like this in the next several games he COULD pass both Towns and OK4 by.

If I had to go out on a limb here, let me predict this: More than likely (and barring a major upset) we are gonna see Wisconsin play KY in the final four. Depending upon who (if anyone) stops Kaminsky, and depending upon whether KY wins and who for UK steps up big, then we might know where Towns and WCS are gonna be picked in the draft.

So that's down the road apiece. But right now WCS outplayed every single player in the SEC tourney including Towns.

And here is yet another possible scenario: Kaminsky. Other than the poster god4gives and myself, everyone here has Kaminsky being picked somewhere between 12 and 15. I strongly disagree. IF Kaminsky has a great game against UK and if Wisc wins, Kaminsky could fly up the charts. WCS is the only Wildcat who can stop Kaminsky. Towns cannot.
Tanking again, I suppose. Is there any other way?
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,300
And1: 55,267
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4611 » by Deeeez Knicks » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:17 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:I wouldn't mind WCS in a scenario where we select #1 or #2 and subsequently trade the pick for WCS and other assets.

Let's say the Kings drafted WCS and we had Towns. Phil knows we need multiple assets --- maybe we move Towns/Calderon for WCS/Collison/McLemore and future 1st from Kings.

We come out of the trade with a starting C and a new starting back-court. We add 2 more pieces in FA -- lets say we sign Monroe and T-Harris.

Collison/Galloway
McLemore/THJ
Melo/T-Harris
Monroe
WCS

At least in this scenario -- we are adding to our depth without spending on older FAs and we'd probably be leaving enough room to add a MAX player in 2016 and we'd also have a 2016 pick from Kings.

Not sure it's a great plan but one example.


If Phil did that i'd be like

Image
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,962
And1: 117,202
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4612 » by mpharris36 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:19 pm

god4gives wrote:Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game


again someone hand me a sawed off shotgun
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
swisscheeseD
NCAA Bracket Challenge Champion
Posts: 9,248
And1: 4,239
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Tonight's The Night
     

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4613 » by swisscheeseD » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:25 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
god4gives wrote:Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game


again someone hand me a sawed off shotgun


Why not just hand it to god4gives, he's already proven good at shooting himself in the foot...maybe he'll put his money where his mouth is.
Chicago Bulls

PG: Kemba Walker / T.Rozier / B.Wannamaker
SG: Donte DiVincenzo / T.Ross / P.Connaughton
SF: Kawhi Leonard / R.O’Neale / Caleb Martin
PF: Draymond Green / B.Portis / A.Aminu
C: Jonas Valanciunas / M.Harrell / F.Kaminsky
User avatar
NYKnicksTAPE
RealGM
Posts: 16,889
And1: 13,426
Joined: Dec 05, 2014
   

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4614 » by NYKnicksTAPE » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:29 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
god4gives wrote:Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game


again someone hand me a sawed off shotgun

He must be Kaminsky's cousin or something
Image
User avatar
JBreezeNY
RealGM
Posts: 20,951
And1: 11,517
Joined: Nov 25, 2010
Location: Welp...we suck.
       

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4615 » by JBreezeNY » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:43 pm

god4gives wrote:Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game

More versatile =/= better

Okafor's post game>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kaminsky's offense
Retired_Doc
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Location: *74* year old ex-New Yorker, now in Europe

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4616 » by Retired_Doc » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:53 pm

For some reason most of you are unwilling to recognize Kaminsky's talents. I say he's Dirk lite. And might even someday equal Dirk. You folks are underrating Kaminsky.

It appears that only god4gives and myself appreciate Kaminsky's skills.

If Kaminsky ends up being ROY next year most of you folks are going to look quite foolish.

Worst yet, you will all have to admit god4gives was right. Ouch, dat gonna hoit! :o :o
Tanking again, I suppose. Is there any other way?
alphad0gz
Analyst
Posts: 3,284
And1: 405
Joined: Oct 10, 2008

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4617 » by alphad0gz » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:53 pm

moocow007 wrote:The general consensus among a lot of scouts is that Towns is the guy you draft for 3 years from now. With Carmelo Anthony in tow, that's not a "better fit". Towns would be a better fit if the Knicks trade Anthony or didn't resign Anthony and instead went on rebuilding from scratch...or Jackson somehow manages to turn Carmelo Anthony into a vampire.


I hear what you're saying but who would play defense on the front line? Is there that guy in the FA pool that can make us sound defensively up front? Surely, if Uncle Lou can score 8 points, shouldn't we able to assume that Towns should be able to score 12-15? His offensive game is much further developed than Amundson's. Seems like it would be much easier to find an offensive-minded forward than a guy who will grab 10+ boards, block a couple of shots, move the ball, and anchor the defense without being an offensive liability. I'm just saying that it seems like it would be easier to build a team around Melo/Towns rather than Melo/Okafor. What direction would you go if we got OK4? What way if we got Towns?
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4618 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:56 pm

So many bad posts... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Always the same posters...
Retired_Doc
Analyst
Posts: 3,664
And1: 367
Joined: Feb 02, 2012
Location: *74* year old ex-New Yorker, now in Europe

Re: *What would you if PJax passes on KAT AND OK4, takes WCS??? 

Post#4619 » by Retired_Doc » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:56 pm

JBreezeNY wrote:
god4gives wrote:Phil Jackson would probably select Kaminsky ahead of WCS & Myles Turner

Kaminsky would fit perfectly in the triangle and he has a better offensive game than Towns. Kaminsky also has a better offensive game than Okafor. Okafor just has a better post game

More versatile =/= better

Okafor's post game>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kaminsky's offense


Kaminsky's all-around game and defense>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OK4's all-around game and impact on a given game.

Near the end of the fourth quarter in an NBA game OK4 will be glued to the bench. No D, no FT skills.
Tanking again, I suppose. Is there any other way?
User avatar
FemaleDogPlease
Veteran
Posts: 2,858
And1: 1,473
Joined: Jun 30, 2010

Re: College Thread AKA Prospect Watch 

Post#4620 » by FemaleDogPlease » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:38 pm

I don't see the Knicks trading down to be honest. However if they don't get the first it second pick I can see them drafting WCS. Knicks need a center and I can easily see Okafor and Towns going in the top 2 spots on size alone. So that would leave WCS as the next best big.

Return to New York Knicks