ImageImageImage

Nemanja Bjelica

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#501 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 12:30 pm

minimus wrote:We need veteran presence in frontcourt. Other than KG. Dieng-Bjeica-Towns-KG is pretty good frountcourt in terms of fit, skills, size, experience. I'm even ok with Payne as 3rd string PF. The only question is AB.


I would rather have a veteran presence like Taj Gibson over Bjelica though, someone whos been in the NBA and can teach the younger guys little things. I mean lets remember Bjelica is good but he still has to adjust to the NBA also.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#502 » by Worm Guts » Fri May 15, 2015 12:34 pm

LaViggins wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:We could trade him, but we need help at PF so I don't see the point. There's no real reason to consider Hummel, he's a fill in guy with a small contract. Towns could play center. The only issue I can see is if we draft Porzingis.


To my knowledge, Wolves people dont see much of a difference between Bjelica and Hummel. Which I would argue because I have seen both, but by the time we hope to be competitive he will be past his prime. I just dont think hes worth putting off the development of Payne and Bennett.


If the Wolves don't there's much of a difference between him and Hummel, I have hard time believing they'd be willing to give him the type contract it would take to bring him over. I haven't heard anything like that though
It seems to me that there's a good chance he's better than both Payne and Bennett. He's a potential asset, and to take advantage of that we need to bring him over.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#503 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 1:04 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
LaViggins wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:We could trade him, but we need help at PF so I don't see the point. There's no real reason to consider Hummel, he's a fill in guy with a small contract. Towns could play center. The only issue I can see is if we draft Porzingis.


To my knowledge, Wolves people dont see much of a difference between Bjelica and Hummel. Which I would argue because I have seen both, but by the time we hope to be competitive he will be past his prime. I just dont think hes worth putting off the development of Payne and Bennett.


If the Wolves don't there's much of a difference between him and Hummel, I have hard time believing they'd be willing to give him the type contract it would take to bring him over. I haven't heard anything like that though
It seems to me that there's a good chance he's better than both Payne and Bennett. He's a potential asset, and to take advantage of that we need to bring him over.


They could still bring him over but I can say with 100% certainty that this is their stance on this.

But the question you have to ask, who will be better in 2-3 years? Bjelica when hes 30, Payne when hes 26, or Bennett when he is 24? Is it worth not having Payne and Bennett reach their ceiling as quick as possible for Bjelica? Just being honest I dont see Bjelica as a savior for the playoffs, if anything might get us a worse pick the next couple years. (And IMO this draft and the next are pretty big for us)
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,827
And1: 5,307
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#504 » by minimus » Fri May 15, 2015 1:10 pm

LaViggins wrote:
minimus wrote:We need veteran presence in frontcourt. Other than KG. Dieng-Bjeica-Towns-KG is pretty good frountcourt in terms of fit, skills, size, experience. I'm even ok with Payne as 3rd string PF. The only question is AB.


I would rather have a veteran presence like Taj Gibson over Bjelica though, someone whos been in the NBA and can teach the younger guys little things. I mean lets remember Bjelica is good but he still has to adjust to the NBA also.

Agree. If we can get Taj Gibson without giving up much. Also he has 8.5 mil contract. Not bargain. Bjelica is special talent. If our coach can maximize his strengths he will be really good.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#505 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 1:23 pm

minimus wrote:
LaViggins wrote:
minimus wrote:We need veteran presence in frontcourt. Other than KG. Dieng-Bjeica-Towns-KG is pretty good frountcourt in terms of fit, skills, size, experience. I'm even ok with Payne as 3rd string PF. The only question is AB.


I would rather have a veteran presence like Taj Gibson over Bjelica though, someone whos been in the NBA and can teach the younger guys little things. I mean lets remember Bjelica is good but he still has to adjust to the NBA also.

Agree. If we can get Taj Gibson without giving up much. Also he has 8.5 mil contract. Not bargain. Bjelica is special talent. If our coach can maximize his strengths he will be really good.



That is true, I have watched a good amount of Bjelica and he is like a swiss army knife. Honestly wont be mad if we sign him but I really hope we can get rid of Chase and/or Bennett if we do. Also will be fun to watch him today go against some tough Real Madrid competition.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#506 » by Worm Guts » Fri May 15, 2015 1:24 pm

LaViggins wrote:
But the question you have to ask, who will be better in 2-3 years? Bjelica when hes 30, Payne when hes 26, or Bennett when he is 24? Is it worth not having Payne and Bennett reach their ceiling as quick as possible for Bjelica? Just being honest I dont see Bjelica as a savior for the playoffs, if anything might get us a worse pick the next couple years. (And IMO this draft and the next are pretty big for us)


I'm not sure being better than Payne or Bennett is a very high bar. When it's all decided, Bjelica could be better than both just by being a solid backup. I'm guessing with Bennett's contract he's out of here sooner than later anyway. I'm fine with having Bjelica, Bennett and Payne compete for playing time next year.
And with Wiggins and this years pick, I don't think we need to go into next year playing for a pick.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#507 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 1:45 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
LaViggins wrote:
But the question you have to ask, who will be better in 2-3 years? Bjelica when hes 30, Payne when hes 26, or Bennett when he is 24? Is it worth not having Payne and Bennett reach their ceiling as quick as possible for Bjelica? Just being honest I dont see Bjelica as a savior for the playoffs, if anything might get us a worse pick the next couple years. (And IMO this draft and the next are pretty big for us)


I'm not sure being better than Payne or Bennett is a very high bar. When it's all decided, Bjelica could be better than both just by being a solid backup. I'm guessing with Bennett's contract he's out of here sooner than later anyway. I'm fine with having Bjelica, Bennett and Payne compete for playing time next year.
And with Wiggins and this years pick, I don't think we need to go into next year playing for a pick.



Well its hard to compare a 27 year old to a 22 and 24 year old. Bjelica is what he is, Payne and Bennett have the chance to be much more than they are now. When its all decided Payne or Bennett could be starting for all we know. This year we werent playing for a pick but now look where its got us. You have to make big jumps in the western conference by developing young guys and getting good draft picks in the process, and we need to do it ASAP with Wiggins here.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#508 » by Worm Guts » Fri May 15, 2015 1:57 pm

LaViggins wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
LaViggins wrote:
But the question you have to ask, who will be better in 2-3 years? Bjelica when hes 30, Payne when hes 26, or Bennett when he is 24? Is it worth not having Payne and Bennett reach their ceiling as quick as possible for Bjelica? Just being honest I dont see Bjelica as a savior for the playoffs, if anything might get us a worse pick the next couple years. (And IMO this draft and the next are pretty big for us)


I'm not sure being better than Payne or Bennett is a very high bar. When it's all decided, Bjelica could be better than both just by being a solid backup. I'm guessing with Bennett's contract he's out of here sooner than later anyway. I'm fine with having Bjelica, Bennett and Payne compete for playing time next year.
And with Wiggins and this years pick, I don't think we need to go into next year playing for a pick.



Well its hard to compare a 27 year old to a 22 and 24 year old. Bjelica is what he is, Payne and Bennett have the chance to be much more than they are now. When its all decided Payne or Bennett could be starting for all we know. This year we werent playing for a pick but now look where its got us. You have to make big jumps in the western conference by developing young guys and getting good draft picks in the process, and we need to do it ASAP with Wiggins here.


All I can say is best man wins. Bennett and Payne got playing time last year and didn't show much. They'll get playing time again next season, but if there's a potentially better option that we already own the rights to, we have to look into it. It just doesn't make any sense not to.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#509 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
LaViggins wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
I'm not sure being better than Payne or Bennett is a very high bar. When it's all decided, Bjelica could be better than both just by being a solid backup. I'm guessing with Bennett's contract he's out of here sooner than later anyway. I'm fine with having Bjelica, Bennett and Payne compete for playing time next year.
And with Wiggins and this years pick, I don't think we need to go into next year playing for a pick.



Well its hard to compare a 27 year old to a 22 and 24 year old. Bjelica is what he is, Payne and Bennett have the chance to be much more than they are now. When its all decided Payne or Bennett could be starting for all we know. This year we werent playing for a pick but now look where its got us. You have to make big jumps in the western conference by developing young guys and getting good draft picks in the process, and we need to do it ASAP with Wiggins here.


All I can say is best man wins. Bennett and Payne got playing time last year and didn't show much. They'll get playing time again next season, but if there's a potentially better option that we already own the rights to, we have to look into it. It just doesn't make any sense not to.


Yeah I agree, may the best man win. It just seemed after all the trades this season especially the Thad-KG one, Flip really embraced the actual rebuild not just the re tool or however he described it.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#510 » by Worm Guts » Fri May 15, 2015 2:13 pm

I don't think this is a retool, it's just seeing what you have.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#511 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 2:20 pm

Worm Guts wrote:I don't think this is a retool, it's just seeing what you have.


I guess, just thinking of some of the other prospects Donatas, Mirotic, heck even Parsons we gave away for nothing I guess it cant hurt.

FWIW this is where I heard details of Wolves view on Bjelica

https://soundcloud.com/1500espn/sports-over-beers-ep-53-would-tom-thibodeau-be-a-wolves-coaching-target
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,513
And1: 12,388
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#512 » by Worm Guts » Fri May 15, 2015 3:12 pm

LaViggins wrote:FWIW this is where I heard details of Wolves view on Bjelica

https://soundcloud.com/1500espn/sports-over-beers-ep-53-would-tom-thibodeau-be-a-wolves-coaching-target


Interesting. I'm not sure what to make of the Hummel-Bjelica comparison, since I haven't seen Bjelica play but I would still like to see what he could do. Whether we should pay him the MLE is a different question.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,043
And1: 6,061
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#513 » by Devilzsidewalk » Fri May 15, 2015 3:27 pm

I thought he's supposed to have this point-forward skillset, how is that like Hummel
Image
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#514 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 3:29 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
LaViggins wrote:FWIW this is where I heard details of Wolves view on Bjelica

https://soundcloud.com/1500espn/sports-over-beers-ep-53-would-tom-thibodeau-be-a-wolves-coaching-target


Interesting. I'm not sure what to make of the Hummel-Bjelica comparison, since I haven't seen Bjelica play but I would still like to see what he could do. Whether we should pay him the MLE is a different question.


From what Ive seen of Bjelica (actual live games not youtube highlights) I would say Hummel is the better shooter, especially from 3 point. But Bjelica is the better rebounder, passer and I would give him the slight edge on defense. Maybe he really could thrive with pieces like Wiggins, LaVine, Bazz all around him. Will be fun to see what happens.
rednal
Ballboy
Posts: 43
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 29, 2014
 

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#515 » by rednal » Fri May 15, 2015 3:50 pm

I can't understand why you are comparing Bjelica withh Hummel, Nemanja is better player period. He's better than payne and he's better than AB, please. The two young PF that minny has don't have the half of the IQ that Nemanja has.

I don't think that Nemanja is gonna be the same player in two years, he improves all years including something more to his game. Is a piece that Wolves need. With him and towns plus Dieng minny has good players in the paint for 4-5 years.

The best player of the year in Europe and you don't think is good enough to play in minny instead payne or AB? I would love seeing both playing at the level of Nemanja in Europe. Euroleague is a very hard league, and being the best isn't easy.
User avatar
LaViggins
Senior
Posts: 593
And1: 140
Joined: Jul 11, 2012
Location: Target Center
     

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#516 » by LaViggins » Fri May 15, 2015 4:38 pm

rednal wrote:I can't understand why you are comparing Bjelica withh Hummel, Nemanja is better player period. He's better than payne and he's better than AB, please. The two young PF that minny has don't have the half of the IQ that Nemanja has.

I don't think that Nemanja is gonna be the same player in two years, he improves all years including something more to his game. Is a piece that Wolves need. With him and towns plus Dieng minny has good players in the paint for 4-5 years.

The best player of the year in Europe and you don't think is good enough to play in minny instead payne or AB? I would love seeing both playing at the level of Nemanja in Europe. Euroleague is a very hard league, and being the best isn't easy.



If you cant understand maybe read then, people actually affiliated with the Wolves compared Bjelica to Hummel. You know, the team that sends scouts to games over there to watch live. And if you read some more you would see I wrote this

To my knowledge, Wolves people dont see much of a difference between Bjelica and Hummel. Which I would argue because I have seen both, but by the time we hope to be competitive he will be past his prime.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,789
And1: 23,102
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#517 » by Klomp » Fri May 15, 2015 4:42 pm

I feel like Bjelica could be the piece that is used for us to trade up into the late 1st if that's what we decide to do.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#518 » by wildvikeswolves » Fri May 15, 2015 4:59 pm

Klomp wrote:I feel like Bjelica could be the piece that is used for us to trade up into the late 1st if that's what we decide to do.


I was just coming in here to say that. Maybe part of a trade up to get Tyus
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#519 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri May 15, 2015 5:06 pm

Trading him to get into the late first would be a complete waste imo. We need to at least bring him in and see how he fares. He'd be a great candidate for summer league to get a feel for the pace and style of NBA basketball but he'll probably be preparing for Eurobasket. I think he's got too much value or at least potential value to be offloaded for merely a late first pick. I'd rather just keep the #31 and take the best prospect available or try and move both 2nd's to move up.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,789
And1: 23,102
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Nemanja Bjelica 

Post#520 » by Klomp » Fri May 15, 2015 5:07 pm

Grits n Gravy wrote:I think he's got too much value or at least potential value to be offloaded for merely a late first pick. I'd rather just keep the #31 and take the best prospect available or try and move both 2nd's to move up.

Late 1st is where his value/potential value is at.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves