Kanter: Should they match?

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Match?

Yes
38
56%
No
23
34%
Sign and Trade, if not then no
7
10%
 
Total votes: 68

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#21 » by bondom34 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:24 am

Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
Old Man Game wrote:I'm concerned matching this Kanter offer means they lose Serge or Russ. Possibly both on their next deals.

Nah.


Kanter will be traded by then most likely.

And the cap will be like doubled.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,560
And1: 6,819
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#22 » by slick_watts » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:25 am

Sam Presti held onto Kendrick Perkins for as long as he possibly could before trading him. The idea that he will trade Kanter at the first sign of incompatibility with the roster seems far fetched given his history.
Podirk
Senior
Posts: 720
And1: 179
Joined: Jul 06, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#23 » by Podirk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:29 am

slick_watts wrote:Sam Presti held onto Kendrick Perkins for as long as he possibly could before trading him. The idea that he will trade Kanter at the first sign of incompatibility with the roster seems far fetched given his history.


I'm assuming Kanter would be more tradable due to his strength is offense.
"no more questions for you bro.......troll"
hardenASG13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,292
And1: 1,922
Joined: Mar 03, 2012

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#24 » by hardenASG13 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:20 am

They need to match. Im hopeful being on a great team for the first time in his career will up his defensive effort. This is probably the first team hes been on where not bringing it defensively isnt tollerated. I think he can at least get to average level, which would be fine considering how good he is offensively. A lineup of westbrook,A-Mo, durant, ibaka, and kanter for stretches in games would be amazing offensively. They would be ok defensively if kanter gives them anything and would put together crazy runs offensively.
Marcus50
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 85
Joined: May 12, 2013

 

Post#25 » by Marcus50 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:45 am

Kanter will start if Presti prepared to pay that amount. At that level he will also playing 30+ minutes per night. If Donovan is seeking to play small ball for say 10 minutes then Adams and Mitch will be battling for the remaining 8-10 minutes. Someone is going to be missing out.
Podirk
Senior
Posts: 720
And1: 179
Joined: Jul 06, 2013

Re: 

Post#26 » by Podirk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:57 am

Marcus50 wrote:Kanter will start if Presti prepared to pay that amount. At that level he will also playing 30+ minutes per night. If Donovan is seeking to play small ball for say 10 minutes then Adams and Mitch will be battling for the remaining 8-10 minutes. Someone is going to be missing out.


By that standard singles is your starting two guard and the bench is augustin morrow dion novak nick.

I'm gonna guess Thunder want to develop their lineups outside of highest to lowest salary.
"no more questions for you bro.......troll"
User avatar
miltk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 751
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#27 » by miltk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:31 am

slick_watts wrote:The only reason they should match is if they feel that not matching would seriously impact Kevin Durant's decision to remain in OKC.


this is exactly what it's about. seems to me, okc though doing extremely well in drafting young talent, never gets over the hump. i do not believe they can go on convincing kd or westy that they're committed to getting a ring if they're not willing to pay up. westy leaves it all on the floor, least okc can do is make the same commitment. if okc doesn't it WILL be about retaining their superstars. kantor maybe be a prob but that was at utah
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#28 » by No-Man » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:38 pm

I honestly dont think Durant cares at all about Kanter staying or not, if he is smart he should know that the Thunder better off with Adams
The only reason why I'd match if I am the Thunder is if I suspect that Durant is planning on leaving, period.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#29 » by bondom34 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:43 pm

Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Podirk
Senior
Posts: 720
And1: 179
Joined: Jul 06, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#30 » by Podirk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:05 pm

bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.


Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.
"no more questions for you bro.......troll"
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#31 » by bondom34 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:12 pm

Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.


Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.

Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Podirk
Senior
Posts: 720
And1: 179
Joined: Jul 06, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#32 » by Podirk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:15 pm

bondom34 wrote:
Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.


Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.

Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.


When OKCs biggest FA has been Anthony Morrow...you go with the trade route.

I see the point though. I just don't want to compete with all the teams freeing up cap space / that will have it with the rising cap.
"no more questions for you bro.......troll"
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#33 » by bondom34 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:15 pm

Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
Podirk wrote:
Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.

Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.


When OKCs biggest FA has been Anthony Morrow...you go with the trade route.

I see the point though. I just don't want to compete with all the teams freeing up cap space / that will have it with the rising cap.

That's been the biggest free agent for a team who's never ever had cap space. Ever.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Podirk
Senior
Posts: 720
And1: 179
Joined: Jul 06, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#34 » by Podirk » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:21 pm

bondom34 wrote:
Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.


When OKCs biggest FA has been Anthony Morrow...you go with the trade route.

I see the point though. I just don't want to compete with all the teams freeing up cap space / that will have it with the rising cap.

That's been the biggest free agent for a team who's never ever had cap space. Ever.


Another good point, though I'm not sure the percentages will go up going from MLE level players to near max.
"no more questions for you bro.......troll"
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,445
And1: 1,875
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#35 » by Kizz Fastfists » Fri Jul 10, 2015 3:29 pm

bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.


I'm sure Presti knows what KD's opinion on bringing Kanter back is. KD has been chilling with him during summer league. I'm sure they have talked about most players in the organization and how KD feels about them. Those don't even have to be planed conversations. They could just come while watching the game talking about Dakari Johnson banging in the pain, McGary showing off, Cook giving some highlight reel plays, Christon's passing and handle, etc. I'm not saying KD has any direct say on the roster, but Presti would be foolish not to be having conversations about the team to him, especially when they are hanging out in Florida.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Zack M
Junior
Posts: 324
And1: 288
Joined: Jul 16, 2014
         

 

Post#36 » by Zack M » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:31 pm

Bring him back whatever the cost
CancerAssassin
Ballboy
Posts: 13
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2015
 

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#37 » by CancerAssassin » Sat Jul 11, 2015 12:28 am

This is my issue with matching. Looking ahead a couple years is what concerns me about matching. For 2017 we would have
PG- Payne
SG
SF - Singler, Heustis
PF - McGary
C - Kanter
Say we signed KD and Russ for $55M. This is the year the repeater tax would take effect. Even with a Cap of ~$100M you're talking about ~$15M to resign Ibaka, Adams, Roberson, A-Mo and filler (2017 draft pick, Collison, Waiters, Augustin, Semaj, Dakari, etc).

It seems like a 1-2 year championship window before the piggy bank breaks unless someone gives us some Spurs-esque discounts.
Marcus50
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 85
Joined: May 12, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#38 » by Marcus50 » Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:16 am

CancerAssassin wrote:This is my issue with matching. Looking ahead a couple years is what concerns me about matching. For 2017 we would have
PG- Payne
SG
SF - Singler, Heustis
PF - McGary
C - Kanter
Say we signed KD and Russ for $55M. This is the year the repeater tax would take effect. Even with a Cap of ~$100M you're talking about ~$15M to resign Ibaka, Adams, Roberson, A-Mo and filler (2017 draft pick, Collison, Waiters, Augustin, Semaj, Dakari, etc).

It seems like a 1-2 year championship window before the piggy bank breaks unless someone gives us some Spurs-esque discounts.


Kanter is worth more than Serge??? If Kanter is worth 17.5 Serge is worth 20+ especially becuase he has to do his own job and Kanters defense
Marcus50
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 85
Joined: May 12, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#39 » by Marcus50 » Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:26 am

Here is my issue. The contract has little trade value - No trade provision in the first year, as a 15% trade bonus plus a 4th year player option. Sure anything may be tradeable but we would get sod all in return. This is way more onerous on the organization than the Perk deal was and I'd argue Perks offense was better than Kanters defense

Then add the tax for next year of at least $11M so he costs the organisation $28M in year 1 (assuming they can give Perry and Novak away free to a good home) and if his defense does not improve has an awful contract from a trade value point of view. I just don't get that he is worth the risk.
Marcus50
Junior
Posts: 417
And1: 85
Joined: May 12, 2013

Re: Kanter: Should they match? 

Post#40 » by Marcus50 » Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:30 am

Podirk wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.


Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.


The huge assumption you are making is the team with Player X wants Kanter. We would only want to trade him if his defense remains tragic so Im not so sure it provides the option you are suggesting here

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder