Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Old Man Game wrote:I'm concerned matching this Kanter offer means they lose Serge or Russ. Possibly both on their next deals.
Nah.
Kanter will be traded by then most likely.
And the cap will be like doubled.
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Old Man Game wrote:I'm concerned matching this Kanter offer means they lose Serge or Russ. Possibly both on their next deals.
Nah.
Kanter will be traded by then most likely.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

slick_watts wrote:Sam Presti held onto Kendrick Perkins for as long as he possibly could before trading him. The idea that he will trade Kanter at the first sign of incompatibility with the roster seems far fetched given his history.
Marcus50 wrote:Kanter will start if Presti prepared to pay that amount. At that level he will also playing 30+ minutes per night. If Donovan is seeking to play small ball for say 10 minutes then Adams and Mitch will be battling for the remaining 8-10 minutes. Someone is going to be missing out.
slick_watts wrote:The only reason they should match is if they feel that not matching would seriously impact Kevin Durant's decision to remain in OKC.

MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.

Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.
Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.
Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.
Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.

Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Podirk wrote:
Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.
Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.
When OKCs biggest FA has been Anthony Morrow...you go with the trade route.
I see the point though. I just don't want to compete with all the teams freeing up cap space / that will have it with the rising cap.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Or, next offseason even with KD's cap hold, they could have an actual substantial amount of cap space.
When OKCs biggest FA has been Anthony Morrow...you go with the trade route.
I see the point though. I just don't want to compete with all the teams freeing up cap space / that will have it with the rising cap.
That's been the biggest free agent for a team who's never ever had cap space. Ever.
bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.
CancerAssassin wrote:This is my issue with matching. Looking ahead a couple years is what concerns me about matching. For 2017 we would have
PG- Payne
SG
SF - Singler, Heustis
PF - McGary
C - Kanter
Say we signed KD and Russ for $55M. This is the year the repeater tax would take effect. Even with a Cap of ~$100M you're talking about ~$15M to resign Ibaka, Adams, Roberson, A-Mo and filler (2017 draft pick, Collison, Waiters, Augustin, Semaj, Dakari, etc).
It seems like a 1-2 year championship window before the piggy bank breaks unless someone gives us some Spurs-esque discounts.
Podirk wrote:bondom34 wrote:Honestly the only way KD should play into this is if he has direct say. Kanter isn't someone you build around so if KD leaves Kanter doesn't help. I doubt he leaves, in which case I don't think they need Kanter anyway. That said, I'm just gonna accept that I'll dislike this contract.
Think of it this way, in the 16-/17 season when player X , making 15-20 mill is available and would fill an actual need of the Thunder, the Thunder will have a contract to trade for player X without losing KD, Russ, or Ibaka.
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder