jumpstart wrote:jumpstart wrote:Vee-Rex wrote:
"teh eest sux! teh est blowz! teh east steenks!"
I swear there's like only 2 dudes with 100 different accounts that keep spewing that lol.
What do you expect people to say? Its true. I think the raptors/miami series was really good. They're both at the same level.
one team gets the ECF spot by default. its a bad division.
I understand....the basketball isn't pretty. But what baffles me is the fact that nobody is crediting the Raptors, Pacers and Heat defense for the reason that the offenses struggled.
Let's look at facts, not just conjecture. The Raptors were 0-2 against Golden State, losing by margins of 3 and 5 points. They are 1-1 against San Antonio. They were 1-1 against Oklahoma City. They were 2-0 against the LA Clippers. They were 2-0 against Portland. They were 2-0 against Dallas. They were 2-0 against Memphis.
So, against the top 7 teams in the west, the Raptors went 10-4. 10-4 against this so called "superior" conference.
The argument against this is that "that was the regular season". But let's think about that. Regular season success translates to postseason success. When was the last time a 8th seed won the NBA Championship? 4th seed? Can't remember? Exactly.
The teams that do extremely well in the regular season are the teams that will do well in the playoffs.So, people can continuously say that the Eastern Conference is the weaker conference, but I BEG to differ, because they have little facts.
Thunder are 0-2 against Cavs, 1-1 against Raptors, 1-1 against Heat, 1-1 against Hawks, 1-1 against Celtics, 2-0 against Hornets, and 1-1 against Pacers.
My facts are this:
Raptors 10-4 against the West top 7. Thunder 7-7 against the East top 7.
My facts are also as I posted already:
KnightofHyrule wrote:BK nets BK wrote:Nice records. Congrats. What do any of that have to do with the fact that the cavs have the easiest path to the finals?
Cavs first round: 42 win Pistons
Warriors first rond: 41 win Rockets.
Pistons 2-0 against Rockets this season.
Cavs second round: 48 win Hawks
Warriors second round: 44 win Blazers
Hawks 2-0 against Blazers
Cavs third round: 56 win Raptors
Warriors third round: 55 win Thunder
Raptors 1-1 against Thunder.
Do I think Raptors are better than the Thunder? Maybe, maybe not. They are 3-3 head to head in the last three years. But there is absolutely no argument to suggest the West is definitely better than the East, other than LeBron being 2-3 in the last 5 Finals (
and the West's record against the East lottery teams, but those teams are irrelevant as they aren't playoff teams). But there are so many statistics, as pointed above, that suggest otherwise.
Pretty offense has gotten to everyone's head. The West is better offensively. But defensively it's the East. 10 of the top 15 teams in DefEff are in the East.
Like the Raptors, the defensive, 54-win 2004 Pistons were also taken to 7 games in the East semis (by the 47 win Nets), but those dudes manhandled the 61-win Pacers en route to the Finals. It wouldn't surprise me if the defensive, 56-win 2016 Raptors did the same to the 57-win Cavs. They are different than GS, OKC and Cle. With those teams, their offense leads to defense. With the Raptors, their defense leads to offense. They are both effective.
TL;DR? WE DO NOT KNOW WHO THE BETTER CONFERENCE IS. Last year it was the West. This year it's impossible to say. Don't let pretty offense fool you.