ImageImageImageImageImage

Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Who will the Lakers pick?

Ben Simmons
47
25%
Brandon Ingram
111
59%
Other
31
16%
 
Total votes: 189

cashflo
Senior
Posts: 713
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 24, 2008

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#841 » by cashflo » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:48 am

BullyKing wrote:
cashflo wrote:They essential don't know Simmons.. Only thru tape and coaches words.

Personally I think Simmons will fall to the Lakers.



Or, you know, the fact that Brett Brown has basically known him since birth.


Yes I did say coaches words, basically Brown has to vouch for the kid but I'm sure that's not enough for Colangelo.
My point is that Ingram has been there, they have been able to speak to him directly(by they I mean the brass of the organization). Hard to pass on a dude you know everything about and you like.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#842 » by BullyKing » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:57 am

cashflo wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
cashflo wrote:They essential don't know Simmons.. Only thru tape and coaches words.

Personally I think Simmons will fall to the Lakers.



Or, you know, the fact that Brett Brown has basically known him since birth.


Yes I did say coaches words, basically Brown has to vouch for the kid but I'm sure that's not enough for Colangelo.
My point is that Ingram has been there, they have been able to speak to him directly(by they I mean the brass of the organization). Hard to pass on a dude you know everything about and you like.


Do you understand how insane this is? So they know everything about Ingram because Brown had dinner with him and he worked out in their gym? But Colangelo will put more weight into that than Brown knowing Simmons his entire life? Clearly you want Simmons to fall to the Lakers but making yourself out to seem like a fool doesn't change the probability of that.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,604
And1: 12,318
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#843 » by Kilroy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:11 am

I learned Lakers Haters and Sixers fans get super defensive if you imply the Lakers may get Simmons.
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
jay51024
Pro Prospect
Posts: 979
And1: 643
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#844 » by jay51024 » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:42 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/BA_Turner/status/743632296469639168[/tweet]
User avatar
myersia
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 788
Joined: Feb 08, 2011
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#845 » by myersia » Fri Jun 17, 2016 12:15 pm

jay51024 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/BA_Turner/status/743632296469639168[/tweet]


I really believe this will be the NBA star of the draft that everyone missed on. I know it's crazy. But he is something special. I believe it.
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#846 » by The Skyhook » Fri Jun 17, 2016 12:17 pm

Do I think Ben Simmons will be the next Lebron James? No, but there are enough similarities in their game that make you wonder how good an offense built around him would look especially after seeing Lebron in these past two games.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,664
And1: 23,972
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#847 » by dockingsched » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:04 pm

Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Lakerglory1
Ballboy
Posts: 26
And1: 11
Joined: May 19, 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#848 » by Lakerglory1 » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:23 pm

myersia wrote:
jay51024 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/BA_Turner/status/743632296469639168[/tweet]


I really believe this will be the NBA star of the draft that everyone missed on. I know it's crazy. But he is something special. I believe it.



I feel the exact same way about Brandon Ingram.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#849 » by iamworthy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:32 pm

dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision



Last year I was on the Jahlil bandwagon but said if the Lakers picked someone else I would still roll with it because the kid must be special. Fast forward a year, I think the Lakers did pick the right guy in D'angelo and he seems like he has all the tools to be very special. In a weird way I'm kind of hoping they pick someone else because in my mind that would mean that the kid they picked blew their minds. I'll support the pick no matter who it is.
Image
User avatar
myersia
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 788
Joined: Feb 08, 2011
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#850 » by myersia » Fri Jun 17, 2016 1:44 pm

dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


I support whom ever they pick. I hope they really look at Buddy though. We are talking about a 4 year college player who is already ready to play and can score efficiently. I just hope they at least consider him. That being said we are in a great place regardless. I am all for anyone they pick outside of Bender.
User avatar
iamworthy
RealGM
Posts: 20,137
And1: 8,916
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Ring City!!!
   

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#851 » by iamworthy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:14 pm

If they want buddy they should trade down.
Image
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,162
And1: 24,477
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#852 » by Pointgod » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:30 pm

dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player
User avatar
Bruh Man
Analyst
Posts: 3,279
And1: 743
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Location: 5th floor
 

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#853 » by Bruh Man » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:47 pm

Pointgod wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player

Agreed, add to that Boston getting Ingram it would make it even worse. I don't see the Lakers passing up on either of those 2 so I'm not worried.
Kilroy
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 21,604
And1: 12,318
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: The Motel 9 in Vegas
       

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#854 » by Kilroy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:06 pm

Pointgod wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player


Does everyone think trading down from 2 to say 5-6, where Hield is likely to fall, is as easy as picking up the phone?

There's this cognitive disconnect among fans that deals are just sitting out there ready to be made for the Lakers, and all Mitch and Jim have to do is say yes...
Obviously, there are deals out there for us, but most smart fans would lose their **** if we actually accepted the crap being offered...

Sure we could trade the 2 for someone at the end of the lottery but trading down 2 or 3 spots is much more difficult, don't you think?
Never have rice at Hanzo's house...
cashflo
Senior
Posts: 713
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 24, 2008

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#855 » by cashflo » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:32 pm

BullyKing wrote:
cashflo wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
Or, you know, the fact that Brett Brown has basically known him since birth.


Yes I did say coaches words, basically Brown has to vouch for the kid but I'm sure that's not enough for Colangelo.
My point is that Ingram has been there, they have been able to speak to him directly(by they I mean the brass of the organization). Hard to pass on a dude you know everything about and you like.


Do you understand how insane this is? So they know everything about Ingram because Brown had dinner with him and he worked out in their gym? But Colangelo will put more weight into that than Brown knowing Simmons his entire life? Clearly you want Simmons to fall to the Lakers but making yourself out to seem like a fool doesn't change the probability of that.


Bud i did say the "brass" of the sixers which includes Colangelo not just Brown.
Coaches come and go so fast and I do not think Brown is calling the shots the way you make it seem.
User avatar
myersia
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 788
Joined: Feb 08, 2011
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#856 » by myersia » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Kilroy wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player


Does everyone think trading down from 2 to say 5-6, where Hield is likely to fall, is as easy as picking up the phone?

There's this cognitive disconnect among fans that deals are just sitting out there ready to be made for the Lakers, and all Mitch and Jim have to do is say yes...
Obviously, there are deals out there for us, but most smart fans would lose their **** if we actually accepted the crap being offered...

Sure we could trade the 2 for someone at the end of the lottery but trading down 2 or 3 spots is much more difficult, don't you think?


Just for fun we should debate who we think we could actually get trading down as far as an established player or two and who would you actually want. I don't think its easy but considering we have the 2nd pick I am sure it's a lot easier trading down then up obviously. If we can get a few established players that fits Luke's style of play and a legit rookie then I am all for it. Again I just want us to get better. If that means drafting Ingram or Simmons then I am cool with that.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#857 » by BullyKing » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:11 pm

cashflo wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
cashflo wrote:
Yes I did say coaches words, basically Brown has to vouch for the kid but I'm sure that's not enough for Colangelo.
My point is that Ingram has been there, they have been able to speak to him directly(by they I mean the brass of the organization). Hard to pass on a dude you know everything about and you like.


Do you understand how insane this is? So they know everything about Ingram because Brown had dinner with him and he worked out in their gym? But Colangelo will put more weight into that than Brown knowing Simmons his entire life? Clearly you want Simmons to fall to the Lakers but making yourself out to seem like a fool doesn't change the probability of that.


Bud i did say the "brass" of the sixers which includes Colangelo not just Brown.
Coaches come and go so fast and I do not think Brown is calling the shots the way you make it seem.


Well "bud", the Sixers "brass" had dinner with Simmons last night so you're hypothesis is now not only stupid but it's also wrong.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
cashflo
Senior
Posts: 713
And1: 131
Joined: Jun 24, 2008

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#858 » by cashflo » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:15 pm

BullyKing wrote:
cashflo wrote:
BullyKing wrote:
Do you understand how insane this is? So they know everything about Ingram because Brown had dinner with him and he worked out in their gym? But Colangelo will put more weight into that than Brown knowing Simmons his entire life? Clearly you want Simmons to fall to the Lakers but making yourself out to seem like a fool doesn't change the probability of that.


Bud i did say the "brass" of the sixers which includes Colangelo not just Brown.
Coaches come and go so fast and I do not think Brown is calling the shots the way you make it seem.


Well "bud", the Sixers "brass" had dinner with Simmons last night so you're hypothesis is now not only stupid but it's also wrong.


So dinner to say don't pick me... Just my thoughts may be stupid but I guess I'm hopeful that we land Simmons... We'll see!
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,162
And1: 24,477
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#859 » by Pointgod » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:16 pm

Kilroy wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
dockingsched wrote:Not that it's likely to happen, but in the event that it does in curious how some of you would react on here.... If the front office ends up going with someone other than Simmons/Ingram, after the initial shock, do you think you'd lean more towards trusting the front office or would you lean more towards being a vocal critic of the decision


Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player


Does everyone think trading down from 2 to say 5-6, where Hield is likely to fall, is as easy as picking up the phone?

There's this cognitive disconnect among fans that deals are just sitting out there ready to be made for the Lakers, and all Mitch and Jim have to do is say yes...
Obviously, there are deals out there for us, but most smart fans would lose their **** if we actually accepted the crap being offered...

Sure we could trade the 2 for someone at the end of the lottery but trading down 2 or 3 spots is much more difficult, don't you think?


When there are only two potential franchise players on the whole draft then yes. You don't think that there were lottery teams that would trade a lot to get a shot at Durant for example? So if the Lakers are looking at someone other than Ingram then it is easy as picking up the phone and fielding offers considering there are teams below us with multiple picks in this draft (Phoenix, Boston, Denver for example). It makes a lot more sense than just using the number 2 pick on a guy who would normally go 4-6.
trevm37
Junior
Posts: 357
And1: 215
Joined: Jun 30, 2015
     

Re: Lakers 2016 NBA draft #2 pick discussion 

Post#860 » by trevm37 » Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:45 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Kilroy wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Unless they traded down for multiple assets then they're idiotic. It's a two man draft and unless they plan on making a trade for an all star player then missing our on a franchise changing player


Does everyone think trading down from 2 to say 5-6, where Hield is likely to fall, is as easy as picking up the phone?

There's this cognitive disconnect among fans that deals are just sitting out there ready to be made for the Lakers, and all Mitch and Jim have to do is say yes...
Obviously, there are deals out there for us, but most smart fans would lose their **** if we actually accepted the crap being offered...

Sure we could trade the 2 for someone at the end of the lottery but trading down 2 or 3 spots is much more difficult, don't you think?


When there are only two potential franchise players on the whole draft then yes. You don't think that there were lottery teams that would trade a lot to get a shot at Durant for example? So if the Lakers are looking at someone other than Ingram then it is easy as picking up the phone and fielding offers considering there are teams below us with multiple picks in this draft (Phoenix, Boston, Denver for example). It makes a lot more sense than just using the number 2 pick on a guy who would normally go 4-6.


Its not a 2 player draft. 2 player drafts do not exist. No one knows which one of these prospects will pan out in a few years, its all speculation. You cant trade down to get a player that could potentially be drafted #3 overall, you just have to pick him at the #2 spot.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers