Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:
I strongly disagree with this statement. If that was the case, you don't need to get guys like Lin, Foye, Scola, or Vasquez. You can just get Gary Neal or Brandon Jennings on a low ball 1 year deal while letting the rookies play max minutes to develop the new kids like what the Lakers are doing this season rolling it out for the young guns to go on a development year.
I disagree. Having veterans around your young guys is EXTREMELY important. Not having solid vets around is the quickest way to have your young guys develop bad habits, and being forced into roles they are not ready for. having Lin and Brook is important. guys who can get shots, create offense so that young guys arent forced into big volume they arent ready for.
Having rookies play max minutes is not a good way to develop players, other then high lotto picks who are ready for that sort of thing.
The Nets are not doing that. For one, there's no purpose in tanking since they got no picks.
Putting development ahead of winning is not the same as tanking. to VERY different things
I see what you are saying. I agree to some extent. I also think Kenny is ambitious and will try to do both. But I do believe they will want to be competitive meaning, if its 85-85 with 3 minutes to go, Scola is probably getting the minutes over Chris Mac for experience or development's sake. In a 20 point blowout either way? Yeah I'm sure the young guys get to play those minutes for experience.
Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:
Second, you don't sign Lin for 3 years and get Foye and backup vets like Vasquez and Scola (not big fans of either V or S but they are vets with history esp. Scola) and play them in the preseason as much as they have if you are planning on the youth movement.
Sure you do, as mentioned you need a mixed enviornment for proper development... Lin is also 28 like brook. they are part of the future. in 2-3 years they will still be in their primes.
My personal opinion is they will try to develop but will play vets more to start the season and if the team is winning, the vets will get to keep playing over the young guys especially in the crunch of close games. If the team is 5-25, yeah I think at that point Scola and Foye are not playing at all and the young guys will get all the minutes to develop. But if they are 22-25 within 3 games of the playoffs? I think development takes a back seat. AGain, personal opinion.
Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:
The guys playing in preseason are the vets. The only new kid is RHJ. Everyone else is an old timer player playing much of the preseason or at least have 2-4 seasons. That's because the Nets plan to be competitive and try to win.
EVERYONE is playing in preseason. like legit all 15 guys. the point is for atkinson to get a glimpse at everyone. this is his first time seeing any of these guys in real action.
Sure I can agree with that.
Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:For anyone thinking this is a redevelopment year or that the Nets can't get that 7th or 8th seed, its because they have never really followed or watched Jeremy Lin that closely. Nets fans thinking this year will be 20-30 wins believe Lin is a 2nd rate point guard on the level of Ramon Sessions, Jarrett Jack, or worse. Boy are these Nets fans in for a pleasant surprise. You got to look beyond his airball layups and jumpers and his unorthodox movements and see the results. It's too easy to get stuck on those things I admit.
Tell that to the GM and coach, who said this is a process and a development year. im not saying they cant win some games and suprise. but the focus is absolutely on development first, winning second.
We're both right till we're not. I see your point. You could be right. I personally think the Nets expect to be much more than developmental. I think they're tempering expectations in the public eye and will wait to see what they are. They don't get an extra pat on the back for coming out and sounding like morons claiming they will make the playoffs when Vegas has them winning 20 games. Lin gives a lot of tells if you follow him. By him not answering how many games they'll win is Lin wanting to say they will be a playoff team and win over 40 and Marks and the front office being smart enough to know you don't need to say that out loud to prove anything to anyone unless you are a "delusional Lin fan" trying to prove your point, like I'm trying to do.
Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:
Lin cannot do it alone. He's not a singular talent. But he has game changing ability. His talents require a team based game and then he'll use his hyper quickness and pick and roll savvy just enough to create headaches for other teams and eek out wins. That's what the Nets have.
Granted Lin needs to play almost all the games for them to be competitive. Otherwise, I think this team is going to stink.
Lin will play every game he is healthy for. he will start every game. we will probably not be very good either way
If Lin plays, the Nets will be good. The only way to prove this is to talk on this again when the season ends.
Prokorov wrote:GoodDayLa wrote:I expect a playoff birth regardless as long as Lin is playing most of the games. This is not delusion talking. Who am I? Just an NBA fan. But this is coming from someone who follows the NBA closely well before Kenny A and D Coleman were doing there thing with Drazen. I've seen enough to know what Lin can do with a team supporting him and built to give him some freedom, as this team is poised to do.
Playoffs would be great... but for me i care more about the young guys developing, atkinson building a culture, and the team playing 100% on a nightly basis. anything on top of that is gravy
I agree with you. What you say sounds reasonable and rational. I also agree the young guys must develop and you develop with playing time and good mentorship.
I'm hoping the way the season plays out is that the vets right the ship and by mid season more of the young guns get minutes. it's a long season and so I'm hoping once the culture has been established after 20-30 games by the vets with Lin and Brook leading the way, the rest will follow and everyone will be confident with the Nets being about .500 after 30 games.
If they can get to .500 after 30 games, they will be even better the next 50. My opinion.
I'm hoping to create a track record starting now to dispel the notion that Jeremy Lin got better at bball or improved his shot this summer. He's the same kid he's always been since he was in high school. And I'm going out on a limb trying to prove a point that probably really doesn't matter but one I believe in which is he's been handcuffed all these years since Linsanity.
So if they make the playoffs, I'm hoping some of my points about him being shackled at prior stops will be vindicated. If they miss the playoffs with Lin playing almost all the games, I am just a Lin homer who will acknowledge Lin isn't that good & I will stop carrying on and over touting Lin's ability on the basketball court.
And I certainly will if the Nets do not make the playoffs while Lin plays almost all the games injury free.
However, I have to make my point clear here now early on, so Nets fans cannot accuse me of being a bandwagon Lin fan who said I told you so after the fact.