ImageImageImageImage

Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide!

Moderators: Howard Mass, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird

MagicFan4Lyfe
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,980
And1: 1,904
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Location: Negative Land
       

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#581 » by MagicFan4Lyfe » Sun Nov 20, 2016 2:20 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:We're a Bledsoe trade away to actually being a competitive serious playoff team. As much as our wings suck I truly don't think that is the issue as seen yesterday with Augustine taking over.


Seriously? First people are all excited about Jodie 'The Savior' Meeks and now an Eric Bledsoe is going to vault us into championship contender status. I am a bit speechless. Next thing we know people are going to say all this team needs is Darrell Armstrong's mustard color suit from the 1995 playoffs and the corpse of Tree Rollins to challenge the Cavs and GSW.
Orlando Magic are BACK!!!
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#582 » by Orlwillbeback » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:05 pm

GortatExpress wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:We're a Bledsoe trade away to actually being a competitive serious playoff team. As much as our wings suck I truly don't think that is the issue as seen yesterday with Augustine taking over.


Seriously? First people are all excited about Jodie 'The Savior' Meeks and now an Eric Bledsoe is going to vault us into championship contender status. I am a bit speechless. Next thing we know people are going to say all this team needs is Darrell Armstrong's mustard color suit from the 1995 playoffs and the corpse of Tree Rollins to challenge the Cavs and GSW.


LOL

It's okay man

I actually have found that this board has been more entertaining than the Magic the last couple years.
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#583 » by Orlwillbeback » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:08 pm

Lol

If DJ Augustin is your go to scorer, you have problems
Mc-o
Analyst
Posts: 3,007
And1: 1,518
Joined: Nov 20, 2015

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#584 » by Mc-o » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:11 pm

Orlwillbeback wrote:Lol

If DJ Augustin is your go to scorer, you have problems

If you haven't noticed ...... the Magic have problems !!!
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#585 » by Orlwillbeback » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:15 pm

I'm fully expecting like a minimum 15 losing streak in like a month. Wins like these, a tiny winning margin against a depleted team, are just more lies lies!
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,944
And1: 5,506
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#586 » by fendilim » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:18 pm

npiper17 wrote:
fendilim wrote:
npiper17 wrote:
There's a number of things that's been wrong with the rebuild - player development, inability to find dleague / second round talent, poor coaching (to name a few) - but the Sixers picked Embiid one pick from Orlando and managed to win the lottery last year.

Imagine if 2013 had been a better draft or if the Magic had been able to draft Porzingis in 2014 (remember he was roundly booed by the same Knicks fans who now worship the ground he walks on so his star potential certainly was no given at the time he was drafted). Luck does come into it as I'm sure other teams were saying when our 1 in 66 chance came in back in 1993.

One pick away is still a big difference.

Imagine Wiggins, Parker and Embiid then the next talent suddenly drops to AG.

Again, we didnt put ourselves in the best position to win the lottery. Thats the problem.


So what you're basically arguing is that the Magic should have tried to lose even more games than they did in 12-13, 13-14 and 14-15 even though they won a grand total of 21, 23 and 25 games over those seasons?

You realise the Cavs won the Wiggins lottery with a better record than the Magic?

I'm sorry but I disagree that the biggest problem with this rebuild has been not losing enough games. And I actually don't think the talent level drop off from Wiggins, Parker and Embiid to Gordon is that great. Often it's what you do with players once you have drafted them and that's where this rebuild has gone wrong (along with the other areas I listed above).

Yes, that's what I'm saying. If you look at the Sixers' record and the Magic's record from 2012 to 2015, the Wins were not that far off. But they put themselves in a good position, to have higher odds winning the lottery.

And if you think Gordon is in the same league with Wiggins, Parker and Embiid as a basketball player, then I won't argue with you anymore. :) As athletes, maybe they are though.
Image
The Other Ankle
Junior
Posts: 491
And1: 260
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#587 » by The Other Ankle » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:20 pm

GortatExpress wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:We're a Bledsoe trade away to actually being a competitive serious playoff team. As much as our wings suck I truly don't think that is the issue as seen yesterday with Augustine taking over.


Seriously? First people are all excited about Jodie 'The Savior' Meeks and now an Eric Bledsoe is going to vault us into championship contender status. I am a bit speechless. Next thing we know people are going to say all this team needs is Darrell Armstrong's mustard color suit from the 1995 playoffs and the corpse of Tree Rollins to challenge the Cavs and GSW.


That suit could really finish a Pick-and-Roll!
Magic_Johnny12
RealGM
Posts: 12,560
And1: 10,117
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Contact:
         

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#588 » by Magic_Johnny12 » Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:21 pm

GortatExpress wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:We're a Bledsoe trade away to actually being a competitive serious playoff team. As much as our wings suck I truly don't think that is the issue as seen yesterday with Augustine taking over.


Seriously? First people are all excited about Jodie 'The Savior' Meeks and now an Eric Bledsoe is going to vault us into championship contender status. I am a bit speechless. Next thing we know people are going to say all this team needs is Darrell Armstrong's mustard color suit from the 1995 playoffs and the corpse of Tree Rollins to challenge the Cavs and GSW.


Reading is truly fundamental my friend. I repeat Bledsoe will make us a "serious" playoff team. Not a team hanging by their fingertips onto 8th seed.

We will not be "champion contender status" until Warriors split up and Lebron retires.
npiper17
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 2,337
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#589 » by npiper17 » Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:17 pm

fendilim wrote:
npiper17 wrote:
fendilim wrote:One pick away is still a big difference.

Imagine Wiggins, Parker and Embiid then the next talent suddenly drops to AG.

Again, we didnt put ourselves in the best position to win the lottery. Thats the problem.


So what you're basically arguing is that the Magic should have tried to lose even more games than they did in 12-13, 13-14 and 14-15 even though they won a grand total of 21, 23 and 25 games over those seasons?

You realise the Cavs won the Wiggins lottery with a better record than the Magic?

I'm sorry but I disagree that the biggest problem with this rebuild has been not losing enough games. And I actually don't think the talent level drop off from Wiggins, Parker and Embiid to Gordon is that great. Often it's what you do with players once you have drafted them and that's where this rebuild has gone wrong (along with the other areas I listed above).

Yes, that's what I'm saying. If you look at the Sixers' record and the Magic's record from 2012 to 2015, the Wins were not that far off. But they put themselves in a good position, to have higher odds winning the lottery.

And if you think Gordon is in the same league with Wiggins, Parker and Embiid as a basketball player, then I won't argue with you anymore. :) As athletes, maybe they are though.


I don't think you're seeing how you're arguing for something and then the other in the same breath. The Magic should have done more to put themselves in a position to win the lottery - but they only won a couple more games than the Sixers? So they should have lost a few more games - is that what you're saying? How did that work in the Cleveland - Wiggins instance then? Magic lost more games than them and the Cavs got lucky because guess what?...that's how a lottery works.

What I am arguing is that we haven't drafted well enough with the picks we had (see the numerous examples of better players taken after Oladipo in 2013) and we haven't yet developed the players we have drafted well enough.

I didn't say they were in the same league (although I think Parker and Gordon have the potential to make similar impact on a winning team but in different areas). I said I didn't think there was a huge drop off as you claimed.
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,944
And1: 5,506
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#590 » by fendilim » Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:54 pm

npiper17 wrote:
fendilim wrote:
npiper17 wrote:
So what you're basically arguing is that the Magic should have tried to lose even more games than they did in 12-13, 13-14 and 14-15 even though they won a grand total of 21, 23 and 25 games over those seasons?

You realise the Cavs won the Wiggins lottery with a better record than the Magic?

I'm sorry but I disagree that the biggest problem with this rebuild has been not losing enough games. And I actually don't think the talent level drop off from Wiggins, Parker and Embiid to Gordon is that great. Often it's what you do with players once you have drafted them and that's where this rebuild has gone wrong (along with the other areas I listed above).

Yes, that's what I'm saying. If you look at the Sixers' record and the Magic's record from 2012 to 2015, the Wins were not that far off. But they put themselves in a good position, to have higher odds winning the lottery.

And if you think Gordon is in the same league with Wiggins, Parker and Embiid as a basketball player, then I won't argue with you anymore. :) As athletes, maybe they are though.


I don't think you're seeing how you're arguing for something and then the other in the same breath. The Magic should have done more to put themselves in a position to win the lottery - but they only won a couple more games than the Sixers? So they should have lost a few more games - is that what you're saying? How did that work in the Cleveland - Wiggins instance then? Magic lost more games than them and the Cavs got lucky because guess what?...that's how a lottery works.

What I am arguing is that we haven't drafted well enough with the picks we had (see the numerous examples of better players taken after Oladipo in 2013) and we haven't yet developed the players we have drafted well enough.

I didn't say they were in the same league (although I think Parker and Gordon have the potential to make similar impact on a winning team but in different areas). I said I didn't think there was a huge drop off as you claimed.


Yes, i'm saying we should have lost more games. The team half-ass tanked every year. Saying we're competing bull. But just look at the record, there really wasnt that much of a difference. Yes, you need luck to win the lottery. But putting yourself in the best position to win it also increases your chance to land a really good player. How many top 9(cleveland) team land in the top 3? Compared to a team with the worst record. That doesnt happen every year compared to the worst record still ending up with a top 3 pick.
Image
Orlwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 11,435
And1: 3,679
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#591 » by Orlwillbeback » Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:56 pm

Ya if only Boston could have lost more games, they would be better off now.
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 26,012
And1: 15,410
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#592 » by Def Swami » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:03 pm

SOUL wrote:

"Some people want to get more shots than the others" plus magicfan9109's post kind of confirms what I thought. The team has beaten some bad teams, but they still have one of the 3 worst point differentials in the league still and seem to have a bad vibe/chemistry among them. On court chemistry was always going to take time to develop, but I fear it's seeping into the locker room as well. The Magic also really need to do something about Payton, Gordon, and Hezonja; the styles of play are doing nothing for their confidence and all 3 look miserable. Basketball is supposed to be fun and only Biyombo looks like he's actually enjoying the game. If the goal is to simply make the playoffs, we'll end up riding Augustin, Fournier, Green, and Ibaka the whole year to maybe make an 8 seed, but that leaves little room for improvement down the road.
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 19,048
And1: 16,555
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#593 » by VFX » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:12 pm

Our record is such a false advertisement of this dumpster fire.

The only team we have truly beaten was OKC by 2 with a surprise career high by Ibaka.

Other wins include
sixers by 2
wizards by 2 without wall (lol)
kings
pelicans without AD
Dallas with no roster

Keep in mind get throttled every game we lose too.

If you would rather have a first round playoff exit than the % to make this team better by adding talent I don't know what to say.
User avatar
Def Swami
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 26,012
And1: 15,410
Joined: Aug 04, 2008
Location: Huevos Bancheros Brunch
Contact:
   

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#594 » by Def Swami » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:16 pm

MagicMatic wrote:Our record is such a false advertisement of this dumpster fire.

The only team we have truly beaten was OKC by 2 with a surprise career high by Ibaka.

Other wins include
sixers by 2
wizards by 2 without wall (lol)
kings
pelicans without AD
Dallas with no roster

Keep in mind get throttled every game we lose too.

If you would rather have a first round playoff exit than the % to make this team better by adding talent I don't know what to say.

It might still be early, but a very real conversation management and ownership need to have.
Bergmaniac
General Manager
Posts: 7,644
And1: 11,425
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
 

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#595 » by Bergmaniac » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:35 pm

We are not getting into the playoffs this season no matter how hard we try unless Hennigan makes a miracle trade. The 6-7 record is really deceiving, if we had had an average schedule we'd have been lucky to have 3 wins so far. The roster is deeply flawed and the chemistry seem bad.
User avatar
Furinkazan
General Manager
Posts: 7,996
And1: 3,633
Joined: May 11, 2005
     

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#596 » by Furinkazan » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:41 pm

Mc-o wrote:
Orlwillbeback wrote:Lol

If DJ Augustin is your go to scorer, you have problems

If you haven't noticed ...... the Magic have problems !!!


99 problems but DJ aint one
AddiFB
Analyst
Posts: 3,001
And1: 2,741
Joined: Jul 31, 2009
Location: Iceland
 

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#597 » by AddiFB » Sun Nov 20, 2016 5:59 pm

If this team makes the playoffs, as its playing so far this season, we'll get hammered, abused and laughed at... and to add to the insult, we'll get a lower draft pick and handed a ticket to 2-3 year trip to Mediocrityland. Fun times ahead.
- Orlando Magic fan since 1991 -
woosah
RealGM
Posts: 12,045
And1: 5,275
Joined: Jul 10, 2008
Location: woosah is someplace living HER best life

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#598 » by woosah » Sun Nov 20, 2016 6:56 pm

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:We're a Bledsoe trade away to actually being a competitive serious playoff team. As much as our wings suck I truly don't think that is the issue as seen yesterday with Augustine taking over.

Why can Bledsoe lead us there and he can't do it with his current team?
Woj is the new Bucher. Shams is the new Woj. Espn is the new TMZ. The NBA is the new WWE.
Boo.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,375
And1: 9,008
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#599 » by drsd » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:02 pm

Orlwillbeback wrote:I'll believe that Philadelphia is set for the future once they actually get out of the gutter. I am not sold on either Simmons or Embiid. Embiid obviously is talented but his injuries obviously hamper him.


And "Noel" and "injury" seem like a synonym at this point.



..
npiper17
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 2,337
Joined: Mar 06, 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: Game 13: Dallas Mavericks (2-9) @ Orlando Magic (5-7)- Worst FG%'s Collide! 

Post#600 » by npiper17 » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:07 pm

fendilim wrote:
npiper17 wrote:
fendilim wrote:Yes, that's what I'm saying. If you look at the Sixers' record and the Magic's record from 2012 to 2015, the Wins were not that far off. But they put themselves in a good position, to have higher odds winning the lottery.

And if you think Gordon is in the same league with Wiggins, Parker and Embiid as a basketball player, then I won't argue with you anymore. :) As athletes, maybe they are though.


I don't think you're seeing how you're arguing for something and then the other in the same breath. The Magic should have done more to put themselves in a position to win the lottery - but they only won a couple more games than the Sixers? So they should have lost a few more games - is that what you're saying? How did that work in the Cleveland - Wiggins instance then? Magic lost more games than them and the Cavs got lucky because guess what?...that's how a lottery works.

What I am arguing is that we haven't drafted well enough with the picks we had (see the numerous examples of better players taken after Oladipo in 2013) and we haven't yet developed the players we have drafted well enough.

I didn't say they were in the same league (although I think Parker and Gordon have the potential to make similar impact on a winning team but in different areas). I said I didn't think there was a huge drop off as you claimed.


Yes, i'm saying we should have lost more games. The team half-ass tanked every year. Saying we're competing bull. But just look at the record, there really wasnt that much of a difference. Yes, you need luck to win the lottery. But putting yourself in the best position to win it also increases your chance to land a really good player. How many top 9(cleveland) team land in the top 3? Compared to a team with the worst record. That doesnt happen every year compared to the worst record still ending up with a top 3 pick.


So, once again, you're arguing that we should have lost more games even though we lost almost as many games as Philly. I think the first two years we tanked about as well as you can.

But rather than complain about WHERE should we not consider WHO has been drafted? Matt Lloyd was brought over from the Bulls to head up the scouting department to much fanfare with examples of good scouting / drafting at poor draft slots e.g. Jimmy Butler, Taj Gibson, Mirotic.

This team could have a core of Gobert, McCollum and Turner right now. I think that's more of a complaint about the rebuild not being right than to say we didn't lose enough games when even when you lose the most games you still only have a 25% shot at the top pick.

Return to Orlando Magic