ImageImage

Marquette Hoops Discussion

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

Diggr14
Analyst
Posts: 3,700
And1: 1,166
Joined: Jan 12, 2008

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#61 » by Diggr14 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 3:28 pm

GBPackers47 wrote:
Johnlac1 wrote:
GBPackers47 wrote:
I agree that I don't see them ready to make any noise in the tournament (or even make it) this year. Definitely would be a different story with Ellenson, but can't fault a guy for taking the guaranteed millions. One and done players can be frustrating, but I think Ellenson making that move is a great recruiting tool Wojo can use, especially when recruiting within the state. For the last few years, Wisconsin has been the better basketball team in the state, but Marquette can use Ellenson, Butler, Crowder, Matthews, Wade (and I guess Novak?). Wisconsin has had some NBA success lately with Frank and Dekker being first rounders, but outside of that, I think Devin Harris is the only guy in the league from the Badgers? I haven't studied the upcoming draft too much yet, but I'm sure Hayes is projected to go somewhere which will be good for them. If Marquette can get back on track with a winning culture (and doing my best to remove bias considering I graduated from there), I think Marquette is the more attractive option in the state for players. Wisconsin is always going to be football first, and Marquette has a list of successful NBA players to go with the Jordan sponsorship (BIG DEAL AND I PRAY THEY NEVER LOSE IT), the new arena, proximity to an "NBA" team, etc.

Now to your second point, Heldt is the only other C on the roster behind Fischer. That isn't going to excite too many people, so I think it's going to be an issue next year. The one positive though is Wojo seems to put at least some attention into having a traditional C. Buzz never really recruited traditional big men and we were usually stuck with the Dwight Burkes of the world playing center. He tried dipping his toes into taller players, but generally failed with Chris Otule and Youssoupha Mbao being examples. Davante Gardner was probably the most productive center we had recently, but again, only 6'8.

I tend to agree about players going after the money if it's there. I think everybody knows that players as good as Ellenson look at college ball as prep for the pros. If the money is there, who wouldn't take it? Break a leg or something, and no millions.
Which is why I snicker at Hayes's comments about him being a poor college player. For one thing, he's getting about a $200,000 deal at Wisconsin if you look at scholarship money and prep for the pros. Plus, if he's that broke (which I doubt), he can leave now and make good money in Europe or China if he doesn't get a good NBA deal...which looks likely.


Agreed. Admittedly I don't follow Wisconsin basketball too closely, but Hayes will absolutely be able to make six figures overseas if the NBA doesn't pan out. I took a class my freshman year at Marquette that had about 15 people in it, Jimmy Butler being one of those 15. I remember asking him if he thought he should get paid to play in college and he said "absolutely not. I'm going to Marquette for free." That always stuck with me because I think that aspect is often an oversight. Basketball is one of the, if not the only, sport where you don't have to make it to the Pros in the states to still make a ton of money. Hell, I guarantee bum *** Todd Mayo is making six figures somewhere.


There is this guy named Michael Finley too, he was pretty good I heard.
Khris Middleton - Beating up on Trash Can Teams since 1943. Invisible Man status otherwise.
GBPackers47
Starter
Posts: 2,166
And1: 1,294
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
     

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#62 » by GBPackers47 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 4:24 pm

Diggr14 wrote:
GBPackers47 wrote:
Johnlac1 wrote:I tend to agree about players going after the money if it's there. I think everybody knows that players as good as Ellenson look at college ball as prep for the pros. If the money is there, who wouldn't take it? Break a leg or something, and no millions.
Which is why I snicker at Hayes's comments about him being a poor college player. For one thing, he's getting about a $200,000 deal at Wisconsin if you look at scholarship money and prep for the pros. Plus, if he's that broke (which I doubt), he can leave now and make good money in Europe or China if he doesn't get a good NBA deal...which looks likely.


Agreed. Admittedly I don't follow Wisconsin basketball too closely, but Hayes will absolutely be able to make six figures overseas if the NBA doesn't pan out. I took a class my freshman year at Marquette that had about 15 people in it, Jimmy Butler being one of those 15. I remember asking him if he thought he should get paid to play in college and he said "absolutely not. I'm going to Marquette for free." That always stuck with me because I think that aspect is often an oversight. Basketball is one of the, if not the only, sport where you don't have to make it to the Pros in the states to still make a ton of money. Hell, I guarantee bum *** Todd Mayo is making six figures somewhere.


There is this guy named Michael Finley too, he was pretty good I heard.


Sure, but he hasn't played in the league since 2010, and hasn't been relevant for even longer. In an age where players are trying to get to the league as quickly as possible, it's important to have current players in the NBA.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,738
And1: 1,314
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#63 » by Thunder Muscle » Tue Dec 6, 2016 8:13 pm

Cohen is going to Green Bay. It sounds like he will only be available for 2nd semester next season. I don't know if he will get another after that or not.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,868
And1: 13,576
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#64 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Tue Dec 6, 2016 8:30 pm

Thunder Muscle wrote:Cohen is going to Green Bay. It sounds like he will only be available for 2nd semester next season. I don't know if he will get another after that or not.

Never understood why guys in his situation transfer at that time unless you really hated your current position. Finish the season, enjoy the ride and try to get better.

Can he redshirt all of next year if he wanted to and then play a full senior year?
skitch815
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
     

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#65 » by skitch815 » Wed Dec 7, 2016 8:44 pm

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
Thunder Muscle wrote:Cohen is going to Green Bay. It sounds like he will only be available for 2nd semester next season. I don't know if he will get another after that or not.

Never understood why guys in his situation transfer at that time unless you really hated your current position. Finish the season, enjoy the ride and try to get better.

Can he redshirt all of next year if he wanted to and then play a full senior year?


You can sit out all of next year and get a full season as long as you haven't burned your redshirt.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,738
And1: 1,314
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#66 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Dec 8, 2016 1:46 pm

skitch815 wrote:
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
Thunder Muscle wrote:Cohen is going to Green Bay. It sounds like he will only be available for 2nd semester next season. I don't know if he will get another after that or not.

Never understood why guys in his situation transfer at that time unless you really hated your current position. Finish the season, enjoy the ride and try to get better.

Can he redshirt all of next year if he wanted to and then play a full senior year?


You can sit out all of next year and get a full season as long as you haven't burned your redshirt.


Per the news up here in GB he is going to petition to get 2nd half of next year AND the full following season.
skitch815
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
     

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#67 » by skitch815 » Thu Dec 8, 2016 7:23 pm

Thunder Muscle wrote:
skitch815 wrote:
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Never understood why guys in his situation transfer at that time unless you really hated your current position. Finish the season, enjoy the ride and try to get better.

Can he redshirt all of next year if he wanted to and then play a full senior year?


You can sit out all of next year and get a full season as long as you haven't burned your redshirt.


Per the news up here in GB he is going to petition to get 2nd half of next year AND the full following season.


They can petition but John Dawson and Liberty did the same thing after he transferred after playing 4 minutes and he hasn't been given the extra year. It could still happen though.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,738
And1: 1,314
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#68 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Dec 8, 2016 8:42 pm

Sure would be nice to beat Wisconsin on Saturday, but not holding my breath. I think it will be one of those games Marquette lurks around but never quite makes it over the hump.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,597
And1: 8,170
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#69 » by Mags FTW » Fri Dec 9, 2016 1:21 am

Thunder Muscle wrote:Sure would be nice to beat Wisconsin on Saturday, but not holding my breath. I think it will be one of those games Marquette lurks around but never quite makes it over the hump.

I wouldn't be surprised if MU won. They're always quicker and flying around on defense with the energy of a rivalry game. Badgers have helped themselves by playing a much tougher schedule so far though.

Probably depends on if Good Nigel or Bad Nigel shows up.
Johnlac1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 1,605
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#70 » by Johnlac1 » Fri Dec 9, 2016 5:43 pm

Marquette definitely has the overall talent, but they could really use a Koenig-type pg to run things. They've got a lot of small, quick, fast guards who can score, but they don't really have a true pg to settle things down.
And in Trice, Wisconsin has a guard who can rival Marquette's guards' speed and quickness.
But if Marquette can keep the forced shots down, they could win.
Another area that will be important is the inside game. The Badgers have Happ and Hayes inside while Marquette has Fischer. How Fischer plays, mainly by staying out of foul trouble, could determine the outcome.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,597
And1: 8,170
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#71 » by Mags FTW » Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:42 pm

Traci Carter is leaving the program.

Why the hell do so many players transfer from MU?
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,318
And1: 3,780
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#72 » by tski1972 » Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:48 pm

why do so many players keeping signing to play there?
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,597
And1: 8,170
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#73 » by Mags FTW » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:18 am

Hopefully they learned a lot from the UW game because they are going to go almost 3 weeks without a real game. 9 day gap from that game to their 2 scrub matchups and then another week until Georgetown. They'll either be well rested or really rusty.
lessthannick11
Sophomore
Posts: 234
And1: 90
Joined: Jan 21, 2004
         

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#74 » by lessthannick11 » Thu Dec 29, 2016 4:34 pm

Nice win over Georgetown. Howard is a stud and they will be set at that position for 4 years now. Grab a win at Seton Hall on Sunday and the season could really be headed in the right direction for the first time in a couple years
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,868
And1: 13,576
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#75 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Thu Dec 29, 2016 5:22 pm

tski1972 wrote:why do so many players keeping signing to play there?

This is kind of an ignorant comment. I don't think MU is a top 10 bball school or anything crazy, but you have to see the appeal of playing for a school where basketball is the top priority (Top 5 in basketball spending if you believe the accounting), they have the Jordan brand (though the jerseys suck this year), play in a major conference, most games are on national television (albeit FS1), they play in a NBA arena (new one opening in a year and a half), they have a great practice facility (and building a huge sports science complex), top 25 in attendance (21 last year for average and probably around 17 for total home attendance in a down year) and has a top 20 college basketball legacy.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,677
And1: 4,479
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#76 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Dec 30, 2016 4:49 am

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
tski1972 wrote:why do so many players keeping signing to play there?

This is kind of an ignorant comment. I don't think MU is a top 10 bball school or anything crazy, but you have to see the appeal of playing for a school where basketball is the top priority (Top 5 in basketball spending if you believe the accounting), they have the Jordan brand (though the jerseys suck this year), play in a major conference, most games are on national television (albeit FS1), they play in a NBA arena (new one opening in a year and a half), they have a great practice facility (and building a huge sports science complex), top 25 in attendance (21 last year for average and probably around 17 for total home attendance in a down year) and has a top 20 college basketball legacy.


I think his comment was the day after another player was leaving the program asking, "why are guys signing if there is such a good chance they'll leave/get asked to leave?" rhetorically.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,597
And1: 8,170
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#77 » by Mags FTW » Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:00 am

lessthannick11 wrote:Nice win over Georgetown. Howard is a stud and they will be set at that position for 4 years now. Grab a win at Seton Hall on Sunday and the season could really be headed in the right direction for the first time in a couple years

Not sure I see Howard staying all 4 years if he keeps playing like this. Being only 17, he can enter the draft after this year or the next with potential as his big selling point.
skitch815
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 59
Joined: Oct 19, 2005
     

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#78 » by skitch815 » Sun Jan 1, 2017 8:27 am

Mags FTW wrote:
lessthannick11 wrote:Nice win over Georgetown. Howard is a stud and they will be set at that position for 4 years now. Grab a win at Seton Hall on Sunday and the season could really be headed in the right direction for the first time in a couple years

Not sure I see Howard staying all 4 years if he keeps playing like this. Being only 17, he can enter the draft after this year or the next with potential as his big selling point.


Howard is listed as 5'11 and I'm pretty sure that's generous. How many guys that small leave school early and get drafted?
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,597
And1: 8,170
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#79 » by Mags FTW » Sun Jan 1, 2017 8:57 am

skitch815 wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:
lessthannick11 wrote:Nice win over Georgetown. Howard is a stud and they will be set at that position for 4 years now. Grab a win at Seton Hall on Sunday and the season could really be headed in the right direction for the first time in a couple years

Not sure I see Howard staying all 4 years if he keeps playing like this. Being only 17, he can enter the draft after this year or the next with potential as his big selling point.


Howard is listed as 5'11 and I'm pretty sure that's generous. How many guys that small leave school early and get drafted?

That's where only being 17/18 comes in. He can try to sell that he may grow a bit more. If he waits until he's a 21 year old senior and still 5'11", he's screwed.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,738
And1: 1,314
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: Marquette 16-17 Discussion 

Post#80 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Jan 5, 2017 1:22 pm

Sounded like Sunday was a gut wrenching loss. At this point, I think NIT is the best case scenario and I'm not booking tickets for that either. I'm still optimistic on Wojo as I think he is a good recruiter and he came to a situation that wasn't left in the best state, but I'm wait & see on if he can maximize the talent. If we're not a NIT team/NCAA bubble team next year, I'll start to get a little concerned since that will be all of his recruits and year 4 of the program.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks