BillyKingGM wrote:A good D1 team with a bunch of seniors and a couple lotto prospects could easily hit .250 or .300 in Euroleague play. I've seen some of these teams, it doesn't matter how old you are, a team like last years Nova or two years ago Duke would absolutely slaughter some of these EL teams. You just couldn't defend some of these kids.
There are 30 games in the EuroLeague regular season. So you are claiming that a good college team could easily win 8-9 games in the EuroLeague, going 8-22 or 9-21, easily for just some good college team.
This is extremely ridiculous. I am sorry, but it is.
I remember just watching Oregon and UCLA not too long ago and Tyler Dorsey and Dillon Brooks are two of the best players on the court in the game...no disrespect to them, as they are both good young players, but let's get serious here.
Neither one of them could see a minute of playing time in any even half way decent EuroLeague team. UcanUwill claims I am overrating EuroLeague and underrating US basketball. No, I am being OBJECTIVE, TRUTHFULL, and REALISTIC.
You are simply totally going into extreme exaggeration, if you think some good college team is winning 8-9 games in EuroLeague. This is absolutely laughable to me and then some.
BillyKingGM wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb that if you don't realize the prospect difference between Fultz and AB (pre NBA) then you probably don't watch much american basketball. Which is fine, but when you say "LOL ANTHONY BENNETT GOT CUT IN EUROLEAGUE CLEARLY EUROLEAGUE IS AWESOME" it makes us all shake our heads.
AB was a surprise #1 overall pick in a super weak prospect class. Fultz is the head-and-shoulders #1 pick in possibly one of the best draft classes of all time. AB had a tiny chance to become an All-star level PF. Fultz has a decent shot of becoming James Harden.
We understand that Doncic is maybe the best prospect to come out of Europe -- that's fine. But when you compare him to Rubio... well... no one gives a crap if you're a better prospect than a non top-20 PG in the NBA. There's 5-6 players just at the top of the 2017 draft class that are gonna be way better than Rubio.
He's not. I can't imagine how someone thinks he would be a better prospective talent than Sabonis, Kukoc, Porzingis, Cosic, Dirk, Pau, and guys like that. 7 footers with great skills and that are decent athletically are definitely better prospective talents than someone like Doncic is. We are talking about the word "prospect" here, as you use it - no way Doncic is best prospect out of Europe. Not even in recent years. He's definitely a better player than any of them at his age, but that's not the same thing as a purely prospective young talent.
About Rubio...how many times does it have to be explained here that he was never a good player in Spanish League, EuroLeague, or Spanish national team? Why is he ever used as a standard player template for young European players? Can we please actually use European players that were actually good players? Rubio was a hyped youth player - he was never actually a good player at any time as a senior level pro. Doncic is already a good pro player. Why can't you see the difference? Rubio hasn't even been a semi decent player for Spain in FIBA tournaments.
Sports Geek wrote:I agree with most parts of your post. Not with this one though. Only Rudy and Llull play significant more minutes than Doncic in Real Madrid, mostly because it is maybe the deepest team in the league. Doncic is sharing a second minutes' pack with Ayon and Randolph. Who could be the contender for Real Madrid for the MVP Award? Maybe the biggest one would be Llull (better total numbers and a better status as a star for years), then Doncic (better per 40 numbers), then Ayón (close to Doncic's per 40 but less clutch, he barely plays in 4th quarters).
http://www.euroleague.net/competition/teams/showteam?clubcode=MAD&seasoncode=E2016#!statsIn the end, MVP Award is about promoting the competition. Does someone doubt that Spanoulis would be the MVP of the season if Olympiacos ends up in the first place? Even when his PIR is not the top in his team (not even in the league's top 30). But he is Spanoulis, that's marketing. Because of the same reason, Doncic could be the MVP of the season. He is really marketable (so young and even he looks good) and Euroleague would be trending topic if that happens.
The funny thing is that Spanoulis is in everybody's mind when we talk about an MVP Award averaging a 12.53 PIR and a 18.79 per 40, while Doncic has a 13.90 PIR and 28.96 per 40, much better numbers than the eternal superstar (and most overrated one ever). I mention Doncic as one of the contenders for the MVP if he keeps doing like this, and I am crazy.
I don't think you understand what an MVP is, even one in EuroLeague terms. EuroLeague MVP is voted on by the fans, and that fan vote gets counted as 5 votes, while the media just once, although the media gets more votes. Basically the guy winning the online fan vote has the great chance to win MVP. Maybe Doncic gets the fan vote - I doubt it, considering Lithuanian, Serbian, Turkish voters are always stuffing the fan vote every year for their players. Americans also do that, but they almost always do it for American players.
Anyway...the media vote isn't going to anyone averaging 9 points and 4 assists a game. If you think that, you simply have no clue as to what a league MVP is.
Same way you mention Spanoulis. How in the world is Spanoulis getting any votes? Yes, he is the best player on Olympiacos. Yes, his team has the tied for 2nd best record, and could easily end up first looking at the schedules...So? How does that put him as league MVP when he has been playing injured the entire season?
He has played the whole season with a severe thigh injury (torn thigh muscles underneath the top layer), and he's often sitting on the bench in games in key minutes because of that, or flat out sitting out games due to that. When he does play his motion is limited and he usually does not play for long stretches either.
The media knows all about the fact he played with that bad injury all season, as well as a deep knee contusion also. You can see how Olympiacos is very careful with his minutes, and so forth. You think the media is voting Spanoulis MVP just because he is the best player on Olympiacos if they get first place, despite he's been injured all season? No. They are not.
Same with the media is not voting a teenager with 9 points and 4 assists numbers as MVP, because his team has a good record.