ImageImageImage

The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,419
And1: 27,985
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1841 » by Green89 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 5:56 pm

jfs1000d wrote:
mattstermh wrote:
smith2373 wrote:
Detroit might ask for Rozier to which Danny has to hang up the phone

Drummond >>>> Ibaka, though. I think Danny would do it

Depends on price.

Big problem with Drummond is that he can't be in game last 2 minutes. It's a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Brad always goes small to end games, anyway. When have you ever seen Zeller, Johnson, or KO out there for the final few possessions?
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1842 » by chrisab123 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:01 pm

Banks2Pierce wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
My criticism stands with Danny Ainge constantly overlooking the rebounding issue this team has. The lack of emphasis he puts on having a quality big man on the team to protect the paint


Must be why he's never had interest in Kevin Love then. Oh wait, he's a shooter which you take some sort of issue with even though it's a really helpful skill and a necessity in this era.

We're not a finished product and Ainge isn't going to spend real assets to add one-dimensional players. Ainge knew that rebounding would be an issue so it's not like he's got blind spots. We're good anyways and specialists would make us worse overall or cost too much. If we were trying to definitively win the title this year, that'd be a point to criticize, but Danny has the bigger picture in mind. Just sits wrong with me to criticize something and not offer actual players/scenarios that should have been pursued. Dedmon's maybe the only one I've got. We actually brought a rebounder in. Anyone want David Lee back?


David Lee is an awful example. Dude was out of shape the entire time here. I would take the David Lee version that played in Dallas last year though. Wouldn't you? I mean whats real assets to you? I'm talking about trading guys like Mickey and Young or maybe even yes Rozier for a big who isn't a FA this year. I was flamed earlier in the season to dare talk about trading Terry flipping Rozier for Nerlens Noel. Noel would have been the perfect complement to this team. A big that can protect the rim and is young and also has been known to get a rebound or two. I guess my issue is watching this team night in and night out and knowing that if they don't make 20 of their 30 3 point attempts they are screwed since we can't rebound worth a damn.
User avatar
BakersDozen
General Manager
Posts: 7,598
And1: 728
Joined: Dec 03, 2003
Location: Springfield,Ma

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1843 » by BakersDozen » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:05 pm

Would anyond be opposed to getting Okafor if he came super cheap? Im talking like Jackson and a couple
Second rounders.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1844 » by SmartWentCrazy » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:09 pm

BakersDozen wrote:Would anyond be opposed to getting Okafor if he came super cheap? Im talking like Jackson and a couple
Second rounders.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


If that's the cost, I think we'd definitely take the chance.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1845 » by chrisab123 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:09 pm

BakersDozen wrote:Would anyond be opposed to getting Okafor if he came super cheap? Im talking like Jackson and a couple
Second rounders.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


I'd deal Rozier for him. I personally don't think Rozier is trash but he honestly is what he is. He's a back of the rotation guard that we overrate because he plays for the C's. But I mean if you could get him for Jackson + Young + Mickey and a few 2nds then sure. But would Danny? I gather that he values James Young alone higher than Okafor.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,166
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1846 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:12 pm

Writebloc wrote:Just listening to Simmons' podcast and he had Sean Grande on, some pretty interesting reveals in the conversation. I think many Celtics' fans are more concerned about defensive rebounding than Ainge and the Celtics are. It seems like everyone on here, for logical reasons, is looking for a big, but it sounds like as Danny has said a while ago he is looking for an off the bench scorer.

I don't think Ainge will go all in for a Whiteside, or any other premier big because Stevens doesn't value that position. The Celtics understand that defensive rebounding is an area of weakness, but they believe that they can work around it. It will be interesting to see what Ainge actually does.


So Ainge will trade for Doug McDermott.
cl2117
General Manager
Posts: 9,030
And1: 7,692
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
 

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1847 » by cl2117 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:16 pm

The thing for me about Okafor is that as a prospect does he hold a ton of value right now? No, most of that has dried up a long time ago.

But as a big off of the bench for just under $5m a year for the next two years who can score inside? I'd say that's definitely fairly valuable. I'd trade Rozier and 2nds for him no problem.

Yes part of it is just the shine that he's a former top pick, but a lot of people trash him saying he's going to be Big Al or Monroe, yet I think we'd happily take either of those guys at $5m to come off the bench for us. Both of those guys are making over double that.
UHar_Vinnie wrote:If you don't lean forward while hugging a dude, you are gonna have a wiener touching incident. You know this.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,099
And1: 14,948
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1848 » by jfs1000d » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:32 pm

Green89 wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
mattstermh wrote:Drummond >>>> Ibaka, though. I think Danny would do it

Depends on price.

Big problem with Drummond is that he can't be in game last 2 minutes. It's a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Brad always goes small to end games, anyway. When have you ever seen Zeller, Johnson, or KO out there for the final few possessions?

Why would you trade a haul for Drummond and then have to sit him during crunch time? That is a problem.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1849 » by klemen4 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:36 pm

I would trade Rozier and first for Okafor BUT...the problem is Okafor 2017 slaary is 5 mill and Rozier only 2 mill and whit this move we would lose max cap space for Hayward of Griffin.

Okafor in right situation can be great scoring 6th man big. Give fim the ball to go one on one when we need a basket. He would excell in this role in Boston imo.
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1850 » by Writebloc » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:43 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Writebloc wrote:Just listening to Simmons' podcast and he had Sean Grande on, some pretty interesting reveals in the conversation. I think many Celtics' fans are more concerned about defensive rebounding than Ainge and the Celtics are. It seems like everyone on here, for logical reasons, is looking for a big, but it sounds like as Danny has said a while ago he is looking for an off the bench scorer.

I don't think Ainge will go all in for a Whiteside, or any other premier big because Stevens doesn't value that position. The Celtics understand that defensive rebounding is an area of weakness, but they believe that they can work around it. It will be interesting to see what Ainge actually does.


So Ainge will trade for Doug McDermott.


A pair that I'd like would be a Tarik Black/Lou Willaims package...
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,419
And1: 27,985
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1851 » by Green89 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:43 pm

jfs1000d wrote:
Green89 wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:Depends on price.

Big problem with Drummond is that he can't be in game last 2 minutes. It's a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Brad always goes small to end games, anyway. When have you ever seen Zeller, Johnson, or KO out there for the final few possessions?

Why would you trade a haul for Drummond and then have to sit him during crunch time? That is a problem.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums


Unless it's an elite scoring big like Davis or Cousins, any other big we obtain probably won't be used by Brad in the final possessions either. He just loves going with 3 guards, especially on the offensive end.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,894
And1: 71,032
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1852 » by Celts17Pride » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:44 pm

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Writebloc wrote:Just listening to Simmons' podcast and he had Sean Grande on, some pretty interesting reveals in the conversation. I think many Celtics' fans are more concerned about defensive rebounding than Ainge and the Celtics are. It seems like everyone on here, for logical reasons, is looking for a big, but it sounds like as Danny has said a while ago he is looking for an off the bench scorer.

I don't think Ainge will go all in for a Whiteside, or any other premier big because Stevens doesn't value that position. The Celtics understand that defensive rebounding is an area of weakness, but they believe that they can work around it. It will be interesting to see what Ainge actually does.


So Ainge will trade for Doug McDermott.

I thought about that the other day but Jerebko actually shoots better
darrendaye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,301
And1: 10,480
Joined: May 06, 2001
Location: Pollard Powered, in Yonkers, NY
     

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1853 » by darrendaye » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:52 pm

If they strike out on Hayward, Mo Speights would be a guy I'd look at to fill the role they need as bench scoring PF. Rebounds modestly well. Wouldn't trade for him, nor would Clippers likely make him available. But could be a worthwhile FA target if the contract length isn't cray cray.
Member of the following organizations:
YPSS: Yes, Pritchard Should Start
RWIT: Rebounding Wing Is a Thing
AAH: All About Hugo
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1854 » by chrisab123 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:57 pm

darrendaye wrote:If they strike out on Hayward, Mo Speights would be a guy I'd look at to fill the role they need as bench scoring PF. Rebounds modestly well. Wouldn't trade for him, nor would Clippers likely make him available. But could be a worthwhile FA target if the contract length isn't cray cray.


I agree with you. But he isn't fitting the model of what Ainge wants. Mo is not even a decent 3 point shooter.
User avatar
jeremym480
Senior
Posts: 701
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jul 15, 2016
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
   

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1855 » by jeremym480 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:12 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:If they strike out on Hayward, Mo Speights would be a guy I'd look at to fill the role they need as bench scoring PF. Rebounds modestly well. Wouldn't trade for him, nor would Clippers likely make him available. But could be a worthwhile FA target if the contract length isn't cray cray.


I agree with you. But he isn't fitting the model of what Ainge wants. Mo is not even a decent 3 point shooter.


Mo's a bad 3 point shooter? He's shooting over 40% from 3 this year. If there's any reason not to want him it's because he's horrible defensively.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1856 » by chrisab123 » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:15 pm

jeremym480 wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
darrendaye wrote:If they strike out on Hayward, Mo Speights would be a guy I'd look at to fill the role they need as bench scoring PF. Rebounds modestly well. Wouldn't trade for him, nor would Clippers likely make him available. But could be a worthwhile FA target if the contract length isn't cray cray.


I agree with you. But he isn't fitting the model of what Ainge wants. Mo is not even a decent 3 point shooter.


Mo's a bad 3 point shooter? He's shooting over 40% from 3 this year. If there's any reason not to want him it's because he's horrible defensively.


In very limited time. But yeah he was a turnstile in GSW
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1857 » by Gomes3PC » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:17 pm

Speights is a nice option if we can prove to him we're close enough to competing for a title. Clear at this point he's a bit of a David West ring-chaser type. Nothing bad with that at all, but just need to recognize he will likely prioritize having a real shot at title contention.

EDIT - also, can't believe he's only 29. Feels like he's 37
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,166
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1858 » by CelticFaninLBC » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:19 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Writebloc wrote:Just listening to Simmons' podcast and he had Sean Grande on, some pretty interesting reveals in the conversation. I think many Celtics' fans are more concerned about defensive rebounding than Ainge and the Celtics are. It seems like everyone on here, for logical reasons, is looking for a big, but it sounds like as Danny has said a while ago he is looking for an off the bench scorer.

I don't think Ainge will go all in for a Whiteside, or any other premier big because Stevens doesn't value that position. The Celtics understand that defensive rebounding is an area of weakness, but they believe that they can work around it. It will be interesting to see what Ainge actually does.


So Ainge will trade for Doug McDermott.

I thought about that the other day but Jerebko actually shoots better


Jerebko is shooting 35.1% from 3, while McDermott is shooting 38.5%, and can create his own offense. McDermott would be a defensive downgrade though.

Gibson and McDermott to Boston for Zeller, Rozier and a pick could be the big trade, with Okafor going to Chicago ... McDermott will make $1.3 million more than Rozier next year, so isn't a max cap space killer, and is a Jerebko replacement too.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,207
And1: 25,991
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1859 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:33 pm

If you are going to trade with Chicago, the player you want is Mirotic, not McDermott. Mirotic's numbers from beyond he arc are way down this year (as are his minutes) but he shot 39% from three point range last year. And Mirotic gets twice as many rebounds per 36 as McDermott.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
leper-con
General Manager
Posts: 8,969
And1: 4,204
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Centre Court

Re: The (Quadruple) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 4.0) 

Post#1860 » by leper-con » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:39 pm

I like our foundation of guards and wing players. This is the league now and we are at the forefront of it.
I think if we add Fultz or Jackson, we can create a monster team.

I salivate at the thought of running a line-up of Brown, Crowder, and Jackson along with Smart and It on the floor at the same time.
A defensive monster with 3 point potential. 3 wins all around 6’7 “and above.
A run and gun athletic team .

Return to Boston Celtics


cron