ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#301 » by chrisab123 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:02 pm

Homerclease wrote:
BakersDozen wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Over reaction city coming off a loss due to a questionable call on the second night of a back to back after playing 6 games in 9 nights including a 4 game west coast trip. This team is 17 games over .500 and currently the 2 seed while missing Bradley and Brown. They aren't a one and done team in the post season and they have a very real chance to land a quality free agent. Back off the ledge people


Over reacting over a loss? Probably... But the rebounding issue is not a over reaction. On a sidenote got my work schedule for next week and Wednesday/thursday off. Very good.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Yep rebounding is a problem. They still somehow are one of the 5 best teams in the association despite it. Every team you come across has a weakness. Those bulls you saw last night are our first round matchup, do you really think they can beat the Celtics in a 7 game series?


If they can out rebound the Celtics by almost 30 that's a bad matchup. When you get to the playoffs it really is all about the matchups. Chicago is not a good one. Neither is Detroit for the same reason. Sure the Celtics beat them this year but its not a lock they'd make it past them. Unless they get a guy who will rebound and or protect the rim.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#302 » by Homerclease » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:03 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
BakersDozen wrote:
Over reacting over a loss? Probably... But the rebounding issue is not a over reaction. On a sidenote got my work schedule for next week and Wednesday/thursday off. Very good.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Yep rebounding is a problem. They still somehow are one of the 5 best teams in the association despite it. Every team you come across has a weakness. Those bulls you saw last night are our first round matchup, do you really think they can beat the Celtics in a 7 game series?


If they can out rebound the Celtics by almost 30 that's a bad matchup. When you get to the playoffs it really is all about the matchups. Chicago is not a good one. Neither is Detroit for the same reason. Sure the Celtics beat them this year but its not a lock they'd make it past them. Unless they get a guy who will rebound and or protect the rim.

They got outrebounded by 30 because they didn't have enough gas in the tank to contest for rebounds. The Celtics had nothing left after this recent week and a half of travel and they got out worked.
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#303 » by chrisab123 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:07 pm

Homerclease wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Yep rebounding is a problem. They still somehow are one of the 5 best teams in the association despite it. Every team you come across has a weakness. Those bulls you saw last night are our first round matchup, do you really think they can beat the Celtics in a 7 game series?


If they can out rebound the Celtics by almost 30 that's a bad matchup. When you get to the playoffs it really is all about the matchups. Chicago is not a good one. Neither is Detroit for the same reason. Sure the Celtics beat them this year but its not a lock they'd make it past them. Unless they get a guy who will rebound and or protect the rim.

They got outrebounded by 30 because they didn't have enough gas in the tank to contest for rebounds. The Celtics had nothing left after this recent week and a half of travel and they got out worked.


Okay I'll give you that. However, this isn't the first night this has happened. It happens almost every game that this team gets out worked on the boards. I can probably count the games on one hand where the Celtics have won that battle this year. Yes they have done a good job overall this year. Yes they'll win 50 + games. A lot of this has been pure luck and eventually that runs out. Even if they were well rested they still probably lose that battle by 15-20 which is still not good.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#304 » by Writebloc » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:08 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Writebloc wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
zzzzzz


This is the response you get when your so wrong you can't even find words. Curry is equal to Brady, dude get a hold on yourself. Brady just willed the Pats back when they were down 28-3, he didn't wilt in the moment like Curry did when the Warriors were up 3-1. Stick to the Warriors' board, front runners seem to be more your speed.


I thought you were an English teacher? The quote was IT is to Dalton as Curry is to Brady, and you understood it fine.

I do suppose that last year's Warriors were akin to Brady going 18-1, but I feel like both guys are proven enough not to worry about that.

Not a Ws fan, btw. Was a Celts fan before you and will be after you, Mr. Joined The Board Two Years Ago.


I never claimed you were anything but a fair weather C's fan. It seems as if your current "hyper-competitive" mentality would fit in well with any team that is slated to win the championship any year, just like all bandwagon fans.

I'm sorry you don't know how to make a proper analogy, the issue is that Curry is nothing like Brady. If you want to consider one NBA title analogous to Brady's five titles than my point remains you are fairly clueless in regards to two sports. That's nothing against Curry who is a great player, but he's just not at TB12's level, not even close.

I doubt whether you were a Celtics' fan before me or not, I believe if I've read your posts correctly, I'm exactly your same age or a little older. The main point of contention is that you simply can't admit to being wrong, I can recognize that no matter when I joined the board. Your other point was that nothing the Celtics have done for the past three season means anything because the only thing that matters is the Nets pick. Which is patently ridiculous and truly does a distinct disservice to your obvious basketball knowledge. Seemingly the only reason you choose to ignore the fallacy of your train of thought is because of a proclamation you made three years ago that you are stubbornly sticking to. To add insult to injury you choose to take any supposed barbs to this line of thinking as a personal assault, then you choose to lash out at the collective. If you are a C's fan you have a strange way to celebrate their success even if success to you is an impossible standard that any rebuilding team couldn't obtain. You have a rigid belief in how you think that a team should be rebuilt and Ainge and the Celtics have deviated from your preferred path. Instead of recognizing that their is not one precise path to greatness you've stuck to your narrow viewpoint and deride posters and fans that chose to celebrate the evident progression points in this current iteration of the Celtics.

So you can chose to maintain this persona if you so chose and bristle at every knick and scrape that you believe that is lobbed at you. The fact that you suffer this death by a thousand message posts is, as I've stated before, a prison of your own making. Every time you chose to snidely diminish anything positive that this team does you engender every single response you consider a personal affront on this message board. There are many posters on this board that openly question the moves of Ainge and the organization, the difference is they are self effacing in that process. You write as if your belief is gospel and anyone who believes otherwise is a dreaded green teamer fanboy who chooses not to be objective in analysis of the process. If you want to be a hard liner fine, that's you being you, just recognize that you don't have sole possession of the book of basketball. Everyone eats humble pie on occasion it's the price of being human.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#305 » by Homerclease » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:10 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
If they can out rebound the Celtics by almost 30 that's a bad matchup. When you get to the playoffs it really is all about the matchups. Chicago is not a good one. Neither is Detroit for the same reason. Sure the Celtics beat them this year but its not a lock they'd make it past them. Unless they get a guy who will rebound and or protect the rim.

They got outrebounded by 30 because they didn't have enough gas in the tank to contest for rebounds. The Celtics had nothing left after this recent week and a half of travel and they got out worked.


Okay I'll give you that. However, this isn't the first night this has happened. It happens almost every game that this team gets out worked on the boards. I can probably count the games on one hand where the Celtics have won that battle this year. Yes they have done a good job overall this year. Yes they'll win 50 + games. A lot of this has been pure luck and eventually that runs out.

Chicago can't shoot, Washington has no bench, Toronto plays only ISO and has a birdbrain for a head coach. You can go on and on and on. There are no perfect teams out there minus the ones at the tip top. I like these Celtics in a 7 game series against anyone in the east not named Cleveland right now
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#306 » by chrisab123 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:18 pm

Homerclease wrote:
chrisab123 wrote:
Homerclease wrote:They got outrebounded by 30 because they didn't have enough gas in the tank to contest for rebounds. The Celtics had nothing left after this recent week and a half of travel and they got out worked.


Okay I'll give you that. However, this isn't the first night this has happened. It happens almost every game that this team gets out worked on the boards. I can probably count the games on one hand where the Celtics have won that battle this year. Yes they have done a good job overall this year. Yes they'll win 50 + games. A lot of this has been pure luck and eventually that runs out.

Chicago can't shoot, Washington has no bench, Toronto plays only ISO and has a birdbrain for a head coach. You can go on and on and on. There are no perfect teams out there minus the ones at the tip top. I like these Celtics in a 7 game series against anyone in the east not named Cleveland right now


Even if you get someone like KOQ or WCS maybe even Noel. 100% agree and I would even like the Celtics chances against Cleveland more than what I do now. Toronto though has owned the Celtics and just shored up their main weakness. Regardless of Casey being a dumpster fire of a coach they are a serious threat. Chicago for a team that can't shoot has been putting up some points lately. Washington beat the Celtics last time despite being a top heavy squad. Only perfect team currently is GSW.
User avatar
BakersDozen
General Manager
Posts: 7,598
And1: 728
Joined: Dec 03, 2003
Location: Springfield,Ma

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#307 » by BakersDozen » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:32 pm

Please.... Just get a rebounder. Another scoring option would be nice too.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#308 » by Captain_Caveman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:32 pm

Writebloc wrote:tl;dr


I don't hate IT a bit. Just have a different impression of how to build a championship team, and not a pretender like the Raps or Horford Hawks. Regardless of my opinions on them, the Warriors are the gold standard right now. IMO, more of you IT pom-pom wavers should watch more of the Ws, to get a clearer idea of exactly how far away we are right now.

How many different franchises have even won titles since 1980, like 8-9? It's not good enough to be good enough in this league. More than any other sport, you have to be great. If we go for greatness and fall short, I can live with it. But there's no excuse for settling for pretty good just because you are entertained, and that's what an IT-led team is.

Bright side is, because of a historically great trade that I was the biggest advocate here for (and which you probably would have argued against haha), we do have a shot to be great someday. Let's not **** it up.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#309 » by SMTBSI » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:39 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:It's not good enough to be good enough in this league. More than any other sport, you have to be great. If we go for greatness and fall short, I can live with it. But there's no excuse for settling for pretty good just because you are entertained

A-****ing-men.



(Didn't actually read the whole conversation, so don't construe this ^ as support for or rejection of anything other than what I quoted.)
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#310 » by Homerclease » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:42 pm

SMTBSI wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:It's not good enough to be good enough in this league. More than any other sport, you have to be great. If we go for greatness and fall short, I can live with it. But there's no excuse for settling for pretty good just because you are entertained

A-****ing-men.

It's good enough for Lou Merloni
Fidel Sarcasmo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,358
And1: 3,073
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Location: hartford, ct.
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#311 » by Fidel Sarcasmo » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:48 pm

Two of my favorite posters at each others throats. I dunno what to think....
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#312 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:52 pm

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:Two of my favorite posters at each others throats. I dunno what to think....

It me...

Image

"Why can't we all just get along?!"
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#313 » by Gomes3PC » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:15 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Writebloc wrote:tl;dr


I don't hate IT a bit. Just have a different impression of how to build a championship team, and not a pretender like the Raps or Horford Hawks. Regardless of my opinions on them, the Warriors are the gold standard right now. IMO, more of you IT pom-pom wavers should watch more of the Ws, to get a clearer idea of exactly how far away we are right now.

How many different franchises have even won titles since 1980, like 8-9? It's not good enough to be good enough in this league. More than any other sport, you have to be great. If we go for greatness and fall short, I can live with it. But there's no excuse for settling for pretty good just because you are entertained, and that's what an IT-led team is.

Bright side is, because of a historically great trade that I was the biggest advocate here for (and which you probably would have argued against haha), we do have a shot to be great someday. Let's not **** it up.

I would generally agree with this - just the caveat that if there were ever a time in NBA history where a title winner could have one of its 2-3 best players be a 5-9 no-defense PG, it is today. I honestly don't see much of any difference in IT's limitations defensively and Curry's. Now, as good as IT is, he's no Curry on offense, just that his flaws are less of a deal-killer in this era than they would be any other time in the NBA.

The challenge I see is finding 2 more elite guys who fit the needs we have. We need a truly dominant rebounder/defender inside, and we need an all-around, 2-way wing who doesn't necessarily need to dominate the ball. In a perfect world, those two guys are DAJ and Paul George IMO, or analogues of them. I can see us finding one of them in a trade - pretty easily, in fact. The 2nd piece is the challenge. It's unfair to him, but if Jaylen can become that elite two-way wing, it is the clearest path to true contention. At that point, you can overpay for the last piece in the frontcourt.

Ultimately that's what this comes down to - Ainge is going to have to hit the jackpot on one of these draft picks and find an elite player who we have on a relatively affordable contract to make the math work.
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,783
And1: 23,443
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#314 » by reload141 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:35 pm

With the way the media is talking about PG13 it seems like he is the most likely guy to become available.... they are pushing him out
OFWGKTA
General Manager
Posts: 9,014
And1: 12,141
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#315 » by OFWGKTA » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:52 pm

What do you guys think of this ridiculousness my brain just came up:

viewforum.php?f=2
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...


GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#316 » by Darth Celtic » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:55 pm

supposed to be a trade thread, just saying
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
chrisab123
RealGM
Posts: 15,216
And1: 10,627
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#317 » by chrisab123 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:58 pm

I'd give up going after Hayward for PG-13. I mean you obviously do your best to keep either the BRK 17 or Jaylen out of the deal but still.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#318 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:09 pm

reload141 wrote:With the way the media is talking about PG13 it seems like he is the most likely guy to become available.... they are pushing him out


Well, he just said that he's hesitant to talk about an extension this summer, saying he wants to compete for a title. Sounds like Bird might want to trade him now.

If I'm Danny, I create a bidding war on that Nets pick this year between Chicago and Indiana. I'd take Butler or George - whoever demands less to go along with the pick.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#319 » by Captain_Caveman » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:15 pm

Fidel Sarcasmo wrote:Two of my favorite posters at each others throats. I dunno what to think....


I'm not at anyone's throat, really. Just defending my takes on this. No problem with me if people really like IT. He's no one's enemy.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#320 » by Writebloc » Fri Feb 17, 2017 7:16 pm

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Writebloc wrote:tl;dr


I don't hate IT a bit. Just have a different impression of how to build a championship team, and not a pretender like the Raps or Horford Hawks. Regardless of my opinions on them, the Warriors are the gold standard right now. IMO, more of you IT pom-pom wavers should watch more of the Ws, to get a clearer idea of exactly how far away we are right now.

How many different franchises have even won titles since 1980, like 8-9? It's not good enough to be good enough in this league. More than any other sport, you have to be great. If we go for greatness and fall short, I can live with it. But there's no excuse for settling for pretty good just because you are entertained, and that's what an IT-led team is.

Bright side is, because of a historically great trade that I was the biggest advocate here for (and which you probably would have argued against haha), we do have a shot to be great someday. Let's not **** it up.


First of all, I never argued against Paul Pierce trade, you won't be able to find the data, but I can assure that I knew the era was finished. If there were arguments against you than we would have been brothers in arms. But in this paragraph is my case in point. You get so upset when other posters call you out, and yet right here you are calling other posters out. It's the golden rule my friend.

I've watched the Warriors, and in fact I find them boring. Hell yes they are a great team, and they were a great team before they signed Kevin Durant. Every team in the NBA is playing catch up. It's not like Danny didn't try to sign Durant, and while he may have never been close he was in the conversation whatever that means.

Your next point is where our main point of contention lies. You don't think IT can lead this team to a championship, I disagree, but that doesn't mean that I'm right and your wrong and vice versa, it just means the book hasn't been written yet. As far as going for greatness if you can't appreciate the fact that 5'6 Isaiah strives and by all metrics (aside from defensive) is achieving greatness on a nightly basis I don't know what to tell you. Isaiah is not the problem in my opinion. No one on this board is settling for pretty good, it is just the realization that the climb is a process. It was a process for the Warriors, it was a process for the Spurs, it's been a process for every single team that has won a championship.

These teenagers that are coming out of college aren't Magic or Bird, they aren't ready to contribute to a championship day one anymore. It is clear in the supposed juggernaut Timberwolves who were forecasted to be a top four seed in the West this year. Clearly the talent level is there, but those kids don't know how to win yet. The first thing that team was to find a coach in Thibs that has a proven track record in winning. People thought the process was going to occur over an offseason for that team and it is obvious that it hasn't. On top of that **** happens, Zach Lavine gets injured, Wiggins has questions on whether he'll be a full fledged star, Kris Dunn could be a bust. As amazing as KAT is that team has a long way to go before it has reached its final destination. Do they have a clearer path to title? Maybe? But who truly knows. Greatness is subjective quality I suppose, I truly think that Ainge is aiming to make this team great. I think he works exhaustively to make that happen. If this guy believe that IT has the ability to be part of the next great Celtics' team I'll believe him because of his track record. If he ends up trading IT for various reasons than I guess we'll have our answer. Don't assume because I'm amazed by what IT is doing means that I don't question what right move is next. As I've stated many times Ainge has a tough job and he's been walking a tightrope. I'm only glad that he's making the decisions and not me because it seems he made the right moves. There is always items to debate, but for the most part he's staying disciplined even in the face of an intensely questioning media, an enthusiastic owner, and a rabid fan base who's chomping at the bit for another championship.

Return to Boston Celtics