Post#1397 » by Mr. E » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:20 am
OK, I am not participating in the GB game threads for the playoffs; but I did go through and read a lot of comments post-game (something I do during the regular season - I like seeing what other fan bases think). As a Mod for the GB I have to say that I appreciate everyone's participation tonight. I did not read every comment; but I did not see any instances which were out of bounds. Obviously, this is a game that can get chippy; and some comments got a bit heated. That said, no one seemed to go after other posters or make things unnecessarily personal. Thank you all for that!
I have come to grips with the fact that the ongoing MVP discussion will be a major factor in the discussion of this series. I do not blame any of you; but rather the stupid NBA for waiting until the end of June for their stupid awards show which I feel is stupid and if you haven't picked up on my feelings then just know that I think that the June 26th regular season awards show is a stupid idea and I will not be watching. I really, really hope that someone leaks the results and ruins the NBA's stupid plans for that stupid show.
That said...it is clear that many of you like discussing the MVP situation. I am not an animal rights activist; but I am pretty opposed to the beating of dead horses. Not everyone shares that mentality, and I respect that. The common theme I picked up upon tonight (and in the past few weeks) is the discussion of the level of talent on each roster. On that front here are my thoughts:
it is not a straight-up measure of one roster against the other in terms of the individual talent of players. The disparity exists, as far as I'm concerned, in team philosophy. I do not believe that Houston's roster is full of better individual players; but it is pretty clear that every player on Houston's roster is a specific fit with defined roles.
Houston has a team identity. It is Harden. That identity is reinforced by coaching in D'Antoni and management in Morey. Every player on the roster is good on their own; but in this specific system centered around a unifying theme (Harden), they work better.
OKC may have some players who are better individually; but I do not see the same cohesiveness of team identity. I cannot enter a discussion of "if we switch Harden & Westbrook which team is better?" because that ignores the bigger picture. One team is currently constructed better than the other. It is not a damnation of OKC, as they have had to deal with some major identity issues with the departure of one of the best players in the NBA. The Rockets, as a system from top to bottom, kind of have something special going on right now, and I am really digging that vibe.
That said - there is A LOT of basketball left in this series. Again, as a General Board mod I appreciate how everyone has handled themselves in this thread. If I have missed anything then remember that I am not policing the thread. If anyone runs across a problem them please report the problem and do not escalate the issue. We are all here because we love basketball and we like getting the point of view of others. Let's keep it cool like that!
Love to OKC...but GO ROCKETS!
"A fanatic is one who can't change their mind and won't change the subject."
- Winston Churchill