ImageImageImageImageImage

ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10)

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#161 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:15 am

Leone continues to bear an uncanny resemblance to a major league reliever.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#162 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:20 am

Pretty big out by Leone if we're coming back from this one run game. Biggest out of the season!
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#163 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:21 am

And this is a bad call.
User avatar
TOStateofMind
RealGM
Posts: 28,596
And1: 21,330
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#164 » by TOStateofMind » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:22 am

I've had enough of these horrible umps
Image
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#165 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:23 am

BigLeagueChew wrote:And this is a bad call.


Buck is wrong, in that Travis was a little off-balance and stepped out of the box. However, he didn't really substantively interfere, either. Not a call you see often, and for good reason.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#166 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:25 am

Okay, Buck...repeating over and over that "Travis never left the batter's box" when they're displaying a freeze-frame of Travis' foot directly in line with the plate isn't helping your case.
Image
**** your asterisk.
johanliebert
General Manager
Posts: 9,842
And1: 5,665
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#167 » by johanliebert » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:29 am

One run lose coming up.
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#168 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:37 am

Schad wrote:Buck is wrong, in that Travis was a little off-balance and stepped out of the box. However, he didn't really substantively interfere, either. Not a call you see often, and for good reason.


Yeah unfortunately in most cases the catcher has the right of way when throwing. If he steps towards the plate while throwing its no wonder he makes contact with Travis when hes off balanced. Travis makes contact with the catcher I guess is how it should be worded this time according to the umpire. As long as they get the call right.
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#169 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:38 am

Need a stat for most innings per game down by a single run.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#170 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:44 am

BigLeagueChew wrote:
Schad wrote:Buck is wrong, in that Travis was a little off-balance and stepped out of the box. However, he didn't really substantively interfere, either. Not a call you see often, and for good reason.


Yeah unfortunately in most cases the catcher has the right of way when throwing. If he steps towards the plate while throwing its no wonder he makes contact with Travis when hes off balanced. Travis makes contact with the catcher I guess is how it should be worded this time according to the umpire. As long as they get the call right.


It's really borderline (at best) because there's very little contact there, and that looks like it occurs after he has released the ball, so it's basically a judgment that the catcher altered his throw as a result, and that's questionable.

The only reason I know the catcher's interference rules back to front is that I caught when I played ball, and I was that **** who went out of their way to get those calls (similarly: if you stand in the back of the box as a hitter and make contact with the catcher's glove on your swing, he gets a sore hand and you get first base). Being left-handed helped...right-handed hitters were always in the way.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#171 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 4:51 am

Schad wrote:
It's really borderline (at best) because there's very little contact there, and that looks like it occurs after he has released the ball, so it's basically a judgment that the catcher altered his throw as a result, and that's questionable.

The only reason I know the catcher's interference rules back to front is that I caught when I played ball, and I was that **** who went out of their way to get those calls (similarly: if you stand in the back of the box as a hitter and make contact with the catcher's glove on your swing, he gets a sore hand and you get first base). Being left-handed helped...right-handed hitters were always in the way.

Yes (catchers interference) . Left handed catchers are very rare that's likely one of the reasons why. :P
User avatar
BigLeagueChew
RealGM
Posts: 10,041
And1: 4,088
Joined: May 26, 2011
Location: Catcher
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#172 » by BigLeagueChew » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:05 am

Seems like every pitch is low outside corner and not many of our hitters want to hit it that way.
johanliebert
General Manager
Posts: 9,842
And1: 5,665
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#173 » by johanliebert » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:06 am

BigLeagueChew wrote:Seems like every pitch is low outside corner and not many of our hitters want to hit it that way.

Easier said than done. That's also a pitchers pitch..they locate that you just tip your hat.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#174 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:08 am

Coghlan seems like a guy who should have waaaay more than 12 successful sac bunts in nine years.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
TOStateofMind
RealGM
Posts: 28,596
And1: 21,330
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#175 » by TOStateofMind » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:10 am

Pitcher looks bad..jays just giving free strikes away with those terrible bunt attempts
Image
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#176 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:12 am

Welp.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#177 » by Schad » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:14 am

Really paying for those early-season off-days...by the time we have another rest day, the team will have traveled from Toronto to LA to St Louis to Tampa to New York.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
JaysRule15
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 23,759
And1: 120,003
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Malvern Crew
       

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#178 » by JaysRule15 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 5:19 am

At least the Raps won. Can't be too depressed about this Jays loss lol. Had a feeling that Chavez would throw the game of his life against us.
Image
User avatar
Natural11
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,144
And1: 2,760
Joined: Nov 27, 2008

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#179 » by Natural11 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:18 pm

Skimmed through this one and honestly that may have been the most frustrating loss this season. Total offensive futility against mediocre pitching. Then you throw a **** home plate ump and yet another pick-off into the mix and you just get a real **** sandwich.

Why can't the Jays manufacture a run with a runner on second base and no outs? This team utterly fails at small ball. If the "big" bats are due up, the excuse is, "hey, we don't pay these guys to move runners and hit singles". What's the excuse now that we don't have any big bats?
johanliebert
General Manager
Posts: 9,842
And1: 5,665
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: ST5: Blue Jays (3-12) vs. Angels (7-10) 

Post#180 » by johanliebert » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:59 pm

Natural11 wrote:Skimmed through this one and honestly that may have been the most frustrating loss this season. Total offensive futility against mediocre pitching. Then you throw a **** home plate ump and yet another pick-off into the mix and you just get a real **** sandwich.

Why can't the Jays manufacture a run with a runner on second base and no outs? This team utterly fails at small ball. If the "big" bats are due up, the excuse is, "hey, we don't pay these guys to move runners and hit singles". What's the excuse now that we don't have any big bats?

well they attempted to bunt in the 9th how that work out?

Return to Toronto Blue Jays