Kizz Fastfists wrote:Old Man Game wrote:It all goes back to mortgaging the future on the deals that brought in Kanter and then Dion. Trading those picks for those sort of "pieces" was a big waste.
I never liked the Waiters deal. The Kanter deal made sense. Kanter was the type of player that should have become an impact player for the Thunder. He just refuses to play defense. If they finish off GS last year and then beat Cleveland then it doesn't matter. Presti was taking a shot at a championship and while I didn't like some of the moves I at least understood what he was trying to accomplish. It isn't like you were expecting to get anything better from picks in the 20s. Who would they have picked in the 20s last year? Who would they pick in the 20s in 2018? Those picks didn't change anything for this season and if you base it on the expected player those picks get you those players were unlikely to ever be significant contributors.
david locke had interesting comments after the kanter trade that he was incapable of diagnosing plays, reading situations, understanding playbooks, etc. he came close to suggesting he has a learning disability. the way kanter plays on defense and even on offense, he's not doing anything out there that requires much advanced thought or reading of opponent's intentions. i think kanter does try, but truly may be incapable.







