heir_jordan22 wrote:chitownsports4ever wrote:heir_jordan22 wrote:I'm trying to explain to you that your logic actually has no logic involved
Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
Well you are doing a very poor job of it considering Carson went z played over 40 college games and so his progress or lack of progress can be charted from Freshman to a senior .
We are grading Trubinsky on the past 12 months of experience he has and the plan to develop him is to sit him for a specified length of time . How is that logical considering the 4 picks we used to get him ?
My argument is that if you spend that amount of assets then you play him or at the very least allow him to compete for his spot because I simply dont see sitting as a viable option for someone who has sat 3 of the last 4 years.
I didn't do a poor job of anything. You did a poor job if reading. I said Wentz played against no talent.
Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
It doesnt matter who he played against it matters that you have 4 years of snaps to look at and so you can see year to year development . We cant see what Trubinsky learned from his first year of starting because he may not play for another year or two ?