FGA restricted all time fantasy draft meta thread. 2 MORE JUDGES NEEDED FOR PLAYOFFS

70sFan · Post #241 » by **70sFan** » Thu May 25, 2017 5:47 pm

I really like more and more Quotatious team. Robinson and McHale are fit great next to each other and we all know how great Oscar was with good bigs. Not to mention AK who is among the best defensive players available.

I don't want to face you in playoffs, at least not in the first round

ardee · Post #242 » by **ardee** » Thu May 25, 2017 6:12 pm

After my latest pick can you say 135 ORtg

lorak · Post #243 » by **lorak** » Thu May 25, 2017 6:38 pm

Cooper is my favorite Laker of all time and I was hoping I will pick him in this round. He is so perfect to this kind of game: low FGA, can play multiple positions both on offense and defense, no chemistry/fit issues too.

Post #244 » by **Quotatious** » Thu May 25, 2017 6:45 pm

70sFan wrote:I really like more and more Quotatious team. Robinson and McHale are fit great next to each other and we all know how great Oscar was with good bigs. Not to mention AK who is among the best defensive players available.

I don't want to face you in playoffs, at least not in the first round

Robinson and McHale seem like a great fit, because both proved they could be very effective alongside other star bigs - McHale with Parish, Robinson with Cummings and Duncan.

Oh, and my three frontcourt players average 7.5 combined blocks per game - I mean '96 Robinson, '88 McHale and '04 Kirilenko, but if I wanted to maximize shot-blocking between them, and take other versions, I would end up with 9.9 bpg.

eminence · Post #245 » by **eminence** » Thu May 25, 2017 6:55 pm

Ecstatic with my big 4 (Kidd/KD/Dirk/Ewing), but fully aware I'll have to squeeze for the rest of my FGA, we'll see how it goes

ardee · Post #246 » by **ardee** » Thu May 25, 2017 7:37 pm

Quotatious wrote:
70sFan wrote:I really like more and more Quotatious team. Robinson and McHale are fit great next to each other and we all know how great Oscar was with good bigs. Not to mention AK who is among the best defensive players available.

I don't want to face you in playoffs, at least not in the first round

Robinson and McHale seem like a great fit, because both proved they could be very effective alongside other star bigs - McHale with Parish, Robinson with Cummings and Duncan.

Oh, and my three frontcourt players average 7.5 combined blocks per game - I mean '96 Robinson, '88 McHale and '04 Kirilenko, but if I wanted to maximize shot-blocking between them, and take other versions, I would end up with 9.9 bpg.

If we play, those blocks aren't going to help you against all the 3s I'll be shooting :wink:

and making :wink:

Dr Spaceman · Post #247 » by **Dr Spaceman** » Thu May 25, 2017 8:59 pm

Shocked that I got Billups this late. Last time he went 17 picks higher. Couldn't be happier to end up with him running point on this team.

Also sorry, I feel like I've been late with my picks holding things up today.

BasketballFan7 · Post #248 » by **BasketballFan7** » Thu May 25, 2017 9:02 pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:Shocked that I got Billups this late. Last time he went 17 picks higher. Couldn't be happier to end up with him running point on this team.

Also sorry, I feel like I've been late with my picks holding things up today.

I dislike you.

I considered him in round three, but PG is pretty deep IMO so I went SG.

Dr Spaceman · Post #249 » by **Dr Spaceman** » Thu May 25, 2017 9:03 pm

Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

ardee · Post #250 » by **ardee** » Thu May 25, 2017 9:31 pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

BasketballFan7 · Post #251 » by **BasketballFan7** » Thu May 25, 2017 9:48 pm

ardee wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

I have Charles Barkley though.

MisterHibachi · Post #252 » by **MisterHibachi** » Fri May 26, 2017 12:40 am

ardee wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

How much does Walton's BBIQ help though when Nash will be making all the decisions (although you might have a different game plan)? His finishing ability will probably be more important.

Statlanta · Post #253 » by **Statlanta** » Fri May 26, 2017 2:22 am

BasketballFan7 wrote:.

Next!

Post #254 » by **GeorgeMarcus** » Fri May 26, 2017 3:03 am

MisterHibachi wrote:
ardee wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

How much does Walton's BBIQ help though when Nash will be making all the decisions (although you might have a different game plan)? His finishing ability will probably be more important.

I can't speak for ardee but I'm of the opinion a team can never have too many play makers, and it helps that Nash was lethal shooting off ball. About 50% of his 3's were assisted throughout his career.

Dr Spaceman · Post #255 » by **Dr Spaceman** » Fri May 26, 2017 4:22 am

Myfavorite pick so far is AD (the OG) in the third round. The dude has serious talent, and I love that 70sfan has the moxie to go against the grain and make him a fixture on his team. I hope voters will come with an open mind enough to hear how Dantley will be used and not write him off entirely for the issues he had in his day.

Dr Spaceman · Post #256 » by **Dr Spaceman** » Fri May 26, 2017 4:25 am

MisterHibachi wrote:
ardee wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

How much does Walton's BBIQ help though when Nash will be making all the decisions (although you might have a different game plan)? His finishing ability will probably be more important.

BBIQ is far more than just playmaking. Screening, cutting, defensive positioning, rebounding, etc. I don't think Walton will lack for ways to contribute.

Dr Spaceman · Post #257 » by **Dr Spaceman** » Fri May 26, 2017 4:26 am

ardee wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Also, while everyone is bragging about their picks- I think I've got y'all beat in terms of collective basketball intelligence. Maybe not as sexy as what some others bring to the table, but I've stocked my team full of guys who simply get it done the first time.

I think I'm up there in terms of BBIQ too mate. Nash and Walton is like putting Newton and Einstein to work on a physics experiment.

Nash could've learned to play some defense with all that IQ :wink:

THKNKG · Post #258 » by **THKNKG** » Fri May 26, 2017 6:13 am

I have you all beat in wingspan. Giannis singlehandedly (armedly?) has your collective teams beat

BasketballFan7 · Post #259 » by **BasketballFan7** » Fri May 26, 2017 10:23 am

Is anybody opposed to shorter windows during the day and a cutoff during the night? I know a few posters echoed in agreement. My pick has come up twice while sleeping, not that it bothers me much.

THKNKG · Post #260 » by **THKNKG** » Fri May 26, 2017 1:59 pm

Well I was going to get Gobert, but my pick came up in the middle of the night... oh well

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums