Summer Trade/(OffSeason) Thread 2017

[Tyakack]

In my opinion Chris Paul is an undoubtebly better option than Gordon Hayward. I have much more confidence in Paul and I have zero confidence in getting value out of resigning Thomas or Bradley. I can understand staying the course with draft picks, but Chris Paul brings us much closer to a championship than Gordon Hayward. It's a HOFer vs. a very good player.

You are not factoring in age at all or really factoring in anything.

[galipeautim]

In my opinion Chris Paul is an undoubtebly better option than Gordon Hayward. I have much more confidence in Paul and I have zero confidence in getting value out of resigning Thomas or Bradley. I can understand staying the course with draft picks, but Chris Paul brings us much closer to a championship than Gordon Hayward. It's a HOFer vs. a very good player.

You are not factoring in age at all or really factoring in anything.

I'm factoring in age. Chris Paul will be more productive over the next four years than Gordan Hayward despite being older. I'm also not assuming we can just get Gordon Hayward, which is not a given.

[galipeautim]

In my opinion Chris Paul is an undoubtebly better option than Gordon Hayward. I have much more confidence in Paul and I have zero confidence in getting value out of resigning Thomas or Bradley. I can understand staying the course with draft picks, but Chris Paul brings us much closer to a championship than Gordon Hayward. It's a HOFer vs. a very good player.

You are not factoring in age at all or really factoring in anything.

I'm factoring in age. Chris Paul will be more productive over the next four years than Gordan Hayward despite being older. I'm also not assuming we can just get Gordon Hayward, which is not a given.

I mean honestly would you rather have KG 32-36 or let's say Richard Jefferson 28-32.

[Feed Your Head]

But you're assuming we could get Chris Paul, when getting Hayward is infinitely more likely. I'd give us a 25% shot at Hayward, which is 25% more likely than Paul.

[galipeautim]

But you're assuming we could get Chris Paul, when getting Hayward is infinitely more likely. I'd give us a 25% shot at Hayward, which is 25% more likely than Paul.

So that means we can't engage in a hypothetical scenario where Chris Paul is available and not Gordon Hayward? I have seen a lot more egregious ideas on this site than that.

[BigTrade92]

Lebron to Celtics?

[galipeautim]

Lebron to Celtics?

not even close to similar...Paul has never been to a conference final and we just went there.

[BigTrade92]

Lebron to Celtics?

not even close to similar...Paul has never been to a conference final and we just went there.

Manute Bol to Celtics?

[galipeautim]

Lebron to Celtics?

not even close to similar...Paul has never been to a conference final and we just went there.

Manute Bol to Celtics?

I would sign up for that in a heartbeat :p

[OFWGKTA]

*smokes*

*logs into realgm*


*logs out of realgm*

[Captain_Caveman]

4 years, $135m for 6'0" guy who is 32 years old?

For Chris Paul - yes. He is a different level of player who has never relied on his athleticism. I have the absolute opposite feeling about Thomas.

There's some truth there, but IMO, Chris Paul is a short-term kill shot, not a long-term building block.

[galipeautim]

*smokes*

*logs into realgm*


*logs out of realgm*

Pass that **** if you have it...I'm just exploring options. Chris Paul being part of a championship is more realistic than Gordon Hayward bringing a championship.

[OFWGKTA]

*smokes*

*logs into realgm*


*logs out of realgm*

Pass that **** if you have it...I'm just exploring options. Chris Paul being part of a championship is more realistic than Gordon Hayward bringing a championship.

Why? They've both gone the same distance in the playoffs, Hayward just beat Paul.

[AgentGreen]

Pass, that ship has sailed.

[galipeautim]

*smokes*

*logs into realgm*


*logs out of realgm*

Pass that **** if you have it...I'm just exploring options. Chris Paul being part of a championship is more realistic than Gordon Hayward bringing a championship.

Why? They've both gone the same distance in the playoffs, Hayward just beat Paul.

Because Paul is a sublimely good PG even a little past his prime and Hayward is a moderate improvement on Jae Crowder.

[OFWGKTA]

Pass that **** if you have it...I'm just exploring options. Chris Paul being part of a championship is more realistic than Gordon Hayward bringing a championship.

Why? They've both gone the same distance in the playoffs, Hayward just beat Paul.

Because Paul is a sublimely good PG even a little past his prime and Hayward is a moderate improvement on Jae Crowder.

And Jimmy Butler isn't if that's your logic?

[galipeautim]

Why? They've both gone the same distance in the playoffs, Hayward just beat Paul.

Because Paul is a sublimely good PG even a little past his prime and Hayward is a moderate improvement on Jae Crowder.

And Jimmy Butler isn't if that's your logic?

Jimmy Butler can play SG and replace a soon to be overpriced Avery Bradley. Jae Crowder allows us to afford everyone else do to his long-term, low priced contract.

[tlee324]

If you're just looking at stats, then it's easy and lazy to say Hayward is a moderate upgrade over Crowder on this team. Adding Hayward also adds another player who can effectively create their shot in one-on-one situations. That changes the whole dynamic in a very positive way with Boston. Crowder isn't much of a shot creator. HOW each player creates their stats is more important than the stat itself.

[OldCeltics]

Lock this thread please. We have 100000 pgs already, false rumor

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app

[GreenMasterz]

Umm.. No.. Please stop ..