Prokorov wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:Prokorov wrote:
i agree they should have ended up with butler or george.... should have parted with the brooklyn and lakers picks for a premium asset like butler.
that said... they have Tatum, Brown, and maybe 2 high lotto picks next year and may still add heyward to thomas and horford.
they should be good for a really long time. i dont know about tatum but brown is going to be an allstar
I don't think they are in a good position going forward.
If they wanted to rebuild they should have kept Fultz and traded Thomas.
Now they have a bunch of rookies stuck behind a 50 win teams full of veterans.
Makes no sense to me at all.
they are a 50 win team stocked with top 3 picks... yet this is a bad thing? lol.
no one is stuck. brown and tatum will be the first guys off the bench. both will play plenty. boston is good now and will continue to be good for a long time as long as injuries dont play a role.
why would they rebuild? they are 1 lebron injury or move to LA from being in the nba finals
I didn't say its a bad thing. Its just an incredible waste.
Boston had a chance to challenge the Warriors if they added Hayward and George/Butler.
I don't see the purpose of "top 3 picks" on 50 win teams. When was the last time you saw a player develop on a really good team.
The most recent example we had was Darko.
19 year old players need a lot of playing time and patience to reach their full potential. I just don't see that happening in Boston. Its not going to happen by "coming off the bench."
One LeBron injury? LOL
You mean the guy that never gets injured.
I'm not convinced that they beat Washington next season. I think they over achieved last year.
