Jeff Van Gully wrote:BKlutch wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
we gotta find this post. and/or the record number of and1s.
i got 59 on the GB once for my response to this question https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=42244622#p42244622
No, you have 60 (now)
You may be the runner up for the Knicks board, but advanced stats show you have the most +1s per word!
wow. per word advanced analytics. i love it. thank you, kind sir.
It's really the kind of deep analytics our computers only have time for during the doldrums of summer, when things are really really s----l-------------o---------------------------------------------w.
But they do help us determine who deserves more playing time here on this board.