Patrick1978 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Patrick1978 wrote:Traded for markannen or portis to Chicago
![]()
![]()
What do you think we can get for a trade of gordon?
A hell of a lot better than Markannen/Portis.
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
Patrick1978 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Patrick1978 wrote:Traded for markannen or portis to Chicago
![]()
![]()
What do you think we can get for a trade of gordon?
Nemesis21 wrote:Patrick1978 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:
![]()
![]()
What do you think we can get for a trade of gordon?
A hell of a lot better than Markannen/Portis.

pepe1991 wrote:He was medicore defender last year.
Other than that, he has no true basketball skills. He can't shoot, he is not much of a rebounder, medicore passer, gives you no rim protection , can't drive at rim or draw fouls and most of his offense comes from offensive rebounds, transition and garbage 50-50 balls.
His "breakout" after allstar break of last season looks much like Tobias Harris breakout year in 2012-13. We all know how that translated into winning basketball.... or lack of the same.
What you guys expect from him ? 20 ppg? He has no offensive skills to average 20 on night to night bases without 18-20 FGA to get there.
Patrick1978 wrote:Nemesis21 wrote:Patrick1978 wrote:What do you think we can get for a trade of gordon?
A hell of a lot better than Markannen/Portis.
So give me a player name you have in mind
Rashoismydad wrote:SOUL wrote:Rashoismydad wrote:What does Gordon do well? In my view he doesnt have a single NBA skill he can hang his hat on and is below average at a lot of things.
If you think Gordon is a below average defensive player than I don't think you've watched much of him.
As a 3 I think hes a below average defender, not as a 4. I think trying to play him at SF was doing him a disservice on both ends of the floor. But as I noted, I thought this was on the general board when I posted, didnt mean to come into the magic forum and go at your boy.
Ducklett wrote:YAY! We turned on AG now too. So, officially, we don't have a single basketball player on the Magic.
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
Blue_and_Whte wrote:It doesn't matter where you posted. Saying he's below average defender and that he doesn't poses any NBA skills is incorrect. He routinely effectively defended some of the best wing players in the league the last couple of seasons. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think he's a star either. I do however think he's a good player who still has room to grow.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

SOUL wrote:"Extremely lucky"
Stop the hyperbole, please. At his height (and I hate measuring strictly off of PPG but for this statement I have to bring it out since that's what you're bringing up) Tobias averaged 17 ppg on 14 shots, Gordon averaged almost 13 last year on 11 shots. And then started averaging 16 when he was moved to his natural position. And he brings way better defense. Tobias was a similarly streaky three point player while here and did not have the defense that AG brings.
Some of you are acting like AG is Jeff Green, it's funny.

pepe1991 wrote:yoyojw17 wrote:pepe1991 wrote:He was medicore defender last year.
Other than that, he has no true basketball skills. He can't shoot, he is not much of a rebounder, medicore passer, gives you no rim protection , can't drive at rim or draw fouls and most of his offense comes from offensive rebounds, transition and garbage 50-50 balls.
His "breakout" after allstar break of last season looks much like Tobias Harris breakout year in 2012-13. We all know how that translated into winning basketball.... or lack of the same.
What you guys expect from him ? 20 ppg? He has no offensive skills to average 20 on night to night bases without 18-20 FGA to get there.
Well with the style of play that they had post all star game.... I don't see why he cannot. Shoot.... booker did it while shooting 42%.... and everyone praises him. lol. He just needs that uptick in touches. To be honest with you.... with a pg like payton he can do it simply by being a notch above everyone else as a pf in the strength and athletic department, and making himself available. I even expect him to hit closer to 5 ft a game with increased assertiveness.
Now.... do i think he's going to be a 20 pt scorer nexxt season..... nah.... cuz i think our team is built so that everyone will be getting a bite every night. If we don't have a super scorer.... having a team that spreads everything around evenly is a great alternative. Needless to say.... he will have career highs in pretty much every category and also I expect a boost in self confidence and begin to take a leadership role on the team.
Booker (who i'm not big fan anyway) has more offensive talent than half of Magic roster togeter, Gordon included. It's so rare to see young kid at age of 20 having so much polish moves like hesitation move, crossovers, step back after a dribble or simply ability to catch i shoot despite being contested for 3 and list goes on ( look what he did to Spurs being guarded by Leonard , scored 39 against him and Green ). His running layup and floaters are better than most of veteran PGs have.
Booker averaged 22 ppg on 36% for 3, Gordon 12,7 ppg on 28% for 3. Shooting isn't about field goal percentage, it's about being treat to opponents, when people leave Gordon wide open as soon as he leaves 10 feet, other teams use their best defenders to contain and contest Bookers' shots. During post allstar period Booker averaged 26 ppg, Gordon 17. For whole season Booker averaged 10 ppg more ,yet still having same TS% and only 1,4% eFG lower . All that being one year younger, on team that didn't even try to hide tanking, having worst jumpshooting team in whole league.
Pretty much every GM and unbiased educated fan would pick Booker over Gordon going into the future. Gordon for what he showed right now is solid energy guy that will get you garbage points and play ok defense. That's literally it. He is poor rebounder for PF, poor rim protector, doesn't have much passing game and on offense simply can't shoot or attack from dribble. Most of the time, on set defense his offense is dribble with step back jumper that he misses on regular bases ( shooting 30% from 16< ,yet that didn't stop him from taking 44% of all shots from that range ).
His nba career went from hype about heing new Griffin to " that 4th guy picked after 3 stars in 2014 " in eyes of most non Magic fans around the world.
Also, going into their 4th season, as go to guys, him and Payton being faces of a team, there is still little to buzz about a team, matter of fact vegas odds set Magic right where they left off last year, being 9-11 place team at the end of a year. Like it's some sort of grand achivment to make playoffs in league where 16 out of 30 teams make it. Especially on freaking , always awful East. How much longer you want to rebuild around guys who are not worth rebuilding around ? 3 years are not enough ?

Rainwater wrote:Lol he might be.
Skin wrote:Ducklett wrote:YAY! We turned on AG now too. So, officially, we don't have a single basketball player on the Magic.
WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
I wish we could tally names.
I'm not turned on AG. This IS the year that he will breakout. People forget that he was hurt for almost his entire rookie year. Went through 3 coaches in 3 years. Played on a team of ball hogs.
At the 4, Gordon will excel offensively because he'll be playing off the ball. This will mitigate the development issues he had trying to operate as a wing. He won't have to beat his man off the dribble as much. His shots will come closer to the rim. His 3pt shots will be much more open. With a clearer role, I can easily see him becoming an 18-19 ppg player... even Dwight and all his offensive awkwardness was able to score 20 ppg because the game played close to the rim doesn't require as much offensive refinement. If Gordon ups his FTA alone, and everything else is the same, he'll still get there.
The bigger question to me is... Will the shot attempts and usage% raise? Will we continue to be the Vuc and Fournier Show?
SOUL wrote:Rainwater wrote:Lol he might be.
I mean last year's version of Jeff Green.
rcklsscognition wrote:We'll be extremely lucky if AG even reaches Tobias Harris level. I will say this feels like a troll, so apologies, but statistically it's true. I'd say they're basically a wash, Tobias better on O but AG better at D, neither enough of a difference maker to make one better than the other.


Def Swami wrote:Woof, Tobias and Aaron are eerily similar statistically. Even if you break it down by just last season, it's nearly the same.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=1&player_id1_hint=Aaron+Gordon&player_id1_select=Aaron+Gordon&player_id1=gordoaa01&y1=2017&player_id2_hint=Tobias+Harris&player_id2_select=Tobias+Harris&player_id2=harrito02&y2=2017