bondom34 wrote:Kinda did.
No, he really did not. What kind of moves did Presti make since 2012 that pointed to really going all in? Hint: His best free agent signing was Anthony Morrow and the most notable players he traded for were Enes Kanter and Dion Waiters.
bondom34 wrote:ould have won if they werw ever...ya know...healthy. Go to other team subs and ask if they'd take Presti.
Yes, they could have. But that's because the core got better over the years, not the cast around it. Presti not once really went for it. Instead he either went with way past their prime vets (Fisher, Butler) or tried to get cute with getting bad players to turn them into good players. Little hint: It didn't work once. Not once.
Instead of maximizing what you have and go for it, Presti wanted to have his cake and eat it as well. He wanted to win it all, but he also wanted to get help by means which hindered the goal to a title. You can't say 'Let's win it all' and also go 'Let's get trash players and hope they'll turn out better in a couple of years'. You can't be a contender and also a D-League development team at the same time.
His approach towards Waiters and Kanter isn't bad per se. But you do that with guys who don't play big roles. You could trade for Stanley Johnson and see if you could turn him into a decent player. But no contender in their right mind would do that and give him the 4th most minutes per game. That's just not how it's done.
EDIT: Look at the Taj GIbson trade. That's exactly the kind of trade that would have helped us get past vs the Warriors. What did Presti do? He traded for a completely washed up Randy Foye.
And yes, I possibly would have been shocked because I really, really iked Payne. But that's something a contender does. Fix a weakness and improve the team.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said