Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
j4remi wrote:The scary things from that article for me are no consistent starting five because it's dependent on the size of 3's and then Kanter over Willy. I don't like either of those.
RIP mags Are We Ther Yet wrote:“Kanter brings that toughness, that hard rolling to the basket,’’ Hornacek said. “That’s something that — if KP’s out there — that might be effective. If our guards can hit him on the roll and get to the basket, then they are going to have to do something, and they can’t really leave KP. So that hard rolling will be critical for us to do.’’
Except they CAN leave KP KNOWING GOOD AND WELL THAT HE IS NEVER GONNA PASS IT! TO ANYONE!
Theoretically...we need a tough guy next to KP who can score some but more importantly...defend and pass well...NOT a black hole of a turnstile.
If Kyle was not so inconsistent or Noah such a bad offensive player...they would be the better fit. If Billy could defend he would be perfect too. Kanter is not the right guy IMO. Everything stops once he gets the ball. Bench player on this team.
Knicksfan20 wrote:j4remi wrote:The scary things from that article for me are no consistent starting five because it's dependent on the size of 3's and then Kanter over Willy. I don't like either of those.
Starting to think we would have been better off just buying melo out. Too much roster clutter .
GONYK wrote:j4remi wrote:The scary things from that article for me are no consistent starting five because it's dependent on the size of 3's and then Kanter over Willy. I don't like either of those.
Yea, I read that, and was like "WTF?"
Jeff, get your sh*t together.
RIP mags
Fury wrote:Who is a bigger black hole, Enes Kanter or Maurice Taylor
GONYK wrote:Are We Ther Yet wrote:“Kanter brings that toughness, that hard rolling to the basket,’’ Hornacek said. “That’s something that — if KP’s out there — that might be effective. If our guards can hit him on the roll and get to the basket, then they are going to have to do something, and they can’t really leave KP. So that hard rolling will be critical for us to do.’’
Except they CAN leave KP KNOWING GOOD AND WELL THAT HE IS NEVER GONNA PASS IT! TO ANYONE!
Theoretically...we need a tough guy next to KP who can score some but more importantly...defend and pass well...NOT a black hole of a turnstile.
If Kyle was not so inconsistent or Noah such a bad offensive player...they would be the better fit. If Billy could defend he would be perfect too. Kanter is not the right guy IMO. Everything stops once he gets the ball. Bench player on this team.
Kanter does require more defensive attention than any of those other guys though.
I'm not thrilled about it, but I'll just grab a drink, and enjoy the tank.
RIP mags
Fury wrote:Who is a bigger black hole, Enes Kanter or Maurice Taylor
rajajackal wrote:Fury wrote:Who is a bigger black hole, Enes Kanter or Maurice Taylor
kevin seraphin was worse than either
Fury wrote:Who is a bigger black hole, Enes Kanter or Maurice Taylor
j4remi wrote:The scary things from that article for me are no consistent starting five because it's dependent on the size of 3's and then Kanter over Willy. I don't like either of those.
2010 wrote:j4remi wrote:The scary things from that article for me are no consistent starting five because it's dependent on the size of 3's and then Kanter over Willy. I don't like either of those.
Coach Hornacek channeling his inner Larry Brown.
Capn'O wrote:rajajackal wrote:Fury wrote:Who is a bigger black hole, Enes Kanter or Maurice Taylor
kevin seraphin was worse than either
Lee Nailon, anyone?
blueNorange wrote:dsj is excelling? really?
is 40% shooting excelling?
is 11.5 ppg on 10.5 shots excelling?
is .488 ts% excelling?
is 3.0 asssists vs 2.3 turnovers excelling?
don't even get me started on malik monk, who's shooting .339% from the floor.
bermanbury can suck it.
HEZI wrote:Capn'O wrote:rajajackal wrote:
kevin seraphin was worse than either
Lee Nailon, anyone?
Al Harrington
