I wish!!
Flake basically said it in more elegant words.
It was a smackdown on the Senate floor.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Ruzious wrote:SD, if you go in with the assumption that all politicians are psychopaths, you've already lost. Maybe that's why you're messed up.
cammac wrote:The Republican Party is unraveling like a ball of string!!
Cruz just backed Moore in Alabama and I think the Democrats have his seat on the radar in 2018.

dckingsfan wrote:Interesting article by David Brooks... probably good advice for public people in this day and age.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/23/opinion/engaging-fanatics.html
dckingsfan wrote:Ruzious wrote:SD, if you go in with the assumption that all politicians are psychopaths, you've already lost. Maybe that's why you're messed up.
I think if you change psychopath to weak self-serving narcissist - then it might be pretty close? And some politicians (Trump) are worse than others.
I added the "weak" because there must be some reason that they constantly kick the ball to the future rather than actually deal with the cause of the problems...
DCZards wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Ruzious wrote:SD, if you go in with the assumption that all politicians are psychopaths, you've already lost. Maybe that's why you're messed up.
I think if you change psychopath to weak self-serving narcissist - then it might be pretty close? And some politicians (Trump) are worse than others.
I added the "weak" because there must be some reason that they constantly kick the ball to the future rather than actually deal with the cause of the problems...
I think the chief reason that elected leaders kick the ball to the future is not because they're weak or don't care. It's because the nation's most deep-seated problems are extremely complex and there are no simple or easy solutions to most of them.
I'm not saying that these problems should not be addressed but addressing them is not an easy task. Real governing is tough stuff.
CobraCommander wrote:DCZards wrote:dckingsfan wrote:I think if you change psychopath to weak self-serving narcissist - then it might be pretty close? And some politicians (Trump) are worse than others.
I added the "weak" because there must be some reason that they constantly kick the ball to the future rather than actually deal with the cause of the problems...
I think the chief reason that elected leaders kick the ball to the future is not because they're weak or don't care. It's because the nation's most deep-seated problems are extremely complex and there are no simple or easy solutions to most of them.
I'm not saying that these problems should not be addressed but addressing them is not an easy task. Real governing is tough stuff.
Give me an example of one of these problems that they have kicked the ball into the future that are so hard to address?
You mean like reasonable gun ownership laws- affordable medical care- workable immigration laws- police policies that protect citizens from misconduct from the POLICE- etc... I dont know if they kicking the ball to the future on these issues because they are hard or because the politicians are not principled enough to do what is right over SAYING what will get them reelected.
Notice how the republicans that are retiring are FINALLY speaking out in force against Trump. Where were these strong admonishments of Trump earlier this year? People are afraid that going against Trump will cost you because his base is vocal and active so they are scared to be a republican and anti Trump...which is disappointing. Dont get me wrong- the democrats dont have the moral high ground- all of the politicians check to see what the masses think THEN tell us what they think—WHICH IS RIDICULOUS and COWARDLY!
We are electing politicians to do what they think is right - We are NOT electing politicians to do our bidding. The citizens dont understand that we are not a pure democracy where the largest mob rules. If that was true we would probably still have Jim Crow laws and we wouldn’t let foreigners in to the USA. We need our politicians to lead...not poll the people and then pick the most popular answer to support.
If we want a government of referendum—we have the technology now to make that possible. But can you imagine how scary that would be? Imagine if pure popularity determined what we did as a country?!?!?! If pure popularity and not character determined our leaders we could end up with a reality tv star with no qualifications as a president and can you imagine how F’ed up that would be? And what if he played to the worse instincts of the people instead of encouraging and inspiring them to be better??? Can you imagine what the most base instinct of the deprived uneducated human mind will conjure? I can. But we dont have to imagine because we saw it happen in Germany in 1932.
dckingsfan wrote:cammac wrote:The Republican Party is unraveling like a ball of string!!
Cruz just backed Moore in Alabama and I think the Democrats have his seat on the radar in 2018.
Sounds like a R talking about the Ds in 2010. The parties will yo-yo back and forth since neither seems able to govern.
Pointgod wrote:dckingsfan wrote:cammac wrote:The Republican Party is unraveling like a ball of string!!
Cruz just backed Moore in Alabama and I think the Democrats have his seat on the radar in 2018.
Sounds like a R talking about the Ds in 2010. The parties will yo-yo back and forth since neither seems able to govern.
I know that under Obama the Democrats had a super majority for a coupe of months but when have Democrats shown they can't govern? Republicans have the executive, congress and senate and they haven't been able to pass a single piece of legislation. It seems like Republicans actually don't know how to govern and when it's a Democratic President they simply refuse to govern. Maybe there are other examples you can provide.
CobraCommander wrote:DCZards wrote:dckingsfan wrote:I think if you change psychopath to weak self-serving narcissist - then it might be pretty close? And some politicians (Trump) are worse than others.
I added the "weak" because there must be some reason that they constantly kick the ball to the future rather than actually deal with the cause of the problems...
I think the chief reason that elected leaders kick the ball to the future is not because they're weak or don't care. It's because the nation's most deep-seated problems are extremely complex and there are no simple or easy solutions to most of them.
I'm not saying that these problems should not be addressed but addressing them is not an easy task. Real governing is tough stuff.
Give me an example of one of these problems that they have kicked the ball into the future that are so hard to address?
You mean like reasonable gun ownership laws- affordable medical care- workable immigration laws- police policies that protect citizens from misconduct from the POLICE- etc... I dont know if they kicking the ball to the future on these issues because they are hard or because the politicians are not principled enough to do what is right over SAYING what will get them reelected.
Notice how the republicans that are retiring are FINALLY speaking out in force against Trump. Where were these strong admonishments of Trump earlier this year? People are afraid that going against Trump will cost you because his base is vocal and active so they are scared to be a republican and anti Trump...which is disappointing. Dont get me wrong- the democrats dont have the moral high ground- all of the politicians check to see what the masses think THEN tell us what they think—WHICH IS RIDICULOUS and COWARDLY!
We are electing politicians to do what they think is right - We are NOT electing politicians to do our bidding. The citizens dont understand that we are not a pure democracy where the largest mob rules. If that was true we would probably still have Jim Crow laws and we wouldn’t let foreigners in to the USA. We need our politicians to lead...not poll the people and then pick the most popular answer to support.
If we want a government of referendum—we have the technology now to make that possible. But can you imagine how scary that would be? Imagine if pure popularity determined what we did as a country?!?!?! If pure popularity and not character determined our leaders we could end up with a reality tv star with no qualifications as a president and can you imagine how F’ed up that would be? And what if he played to the worse instincts of the people instead of encouraging and inspiring them to be better??? Can you imagine what the most base instinct of the deprived uneducated human mind will conjure? I can. But we dont have to imagine because we saw it happen in Germany in 1932.
stilldropin20 wrote:Pointgod wrote:dckingsfan wrote:Sounds like a R talking about the Ds in 2010. The parties will yo-yo back and forth since neither seems able to govern.
I know that under Obama the Democrats had a super majority for a coupe of months but when have Democrats shown they can't govern? Republicans have the executive, congress and senate and they haven't been able to pass a single piece of legislation. It seems like Republicans actually don't know how to govern and when it's a Democratic President they simply refuse to govern. Maybe there are other examples you can provide.
that's actually one of trumps strengths and to use Ruzious terms, you guys cant see the forrest for th etrees. trump is actually willing to sign political suicide legislation. and its not suicide because its bad. its suicide because no one wants to touch it becuase you lose those swing votes. trump is the only guy since reagan willing to take on tax reform and immigration reform. No one in the modern era even tried to do the dirty work. just keep kicking it down the line so as not to lose swing voters like me.
We haven't seen a politician with the backbone of trump since reagan and may never see one in a long time. R's are just afraid to put legislation in front of him cuz he will actually sign it. and they dont have the cover he has with his base. they cant afford to lose swing voters.
btw, even the wash post is reporting tonight on uranium 1 tonight!!!! even the wash post!! lol bought time.
"breaking" Republicans finally launching investigations into trump dossier and uranium 1. Smoking guns all over the place. like i said, its about to go down.
CNN been lying to you guys for over a year on all of these things. Foz news and NY times more than2 years out in front on these things. wash post finally reporting. who will be last? my money is on CNN last to report, lol.
stilldropin20 wrote:Bill Clinton's russian speaking fee paid by the bank with ties to Putin and ties to Uranium 1. Hillary approved this deal as sec of state. $145Million poured into the Clinton foundation while she was sec of state during the 18 months while negotiating the many branches of the Uranium 1 deal most of which from overseas, Russia and the middle east.
Congress will also be launching investigation into Obama DOJ.
even the washington post finally reporting [b]"Hillary clinton's campaign and DNC PAID for the entire research for the Trump Dossier."
[/b]
lots and lots more coming. Fusion GPS is dirty as dirty. Dems and DNC have LIED to the american people. during the entire campaign. wow!!!! more coming!!
Pointgod wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:Bill Clinton's russian speaking fee paid by the bank with ties to Putin and ties to Uranium 1. Hillary approved this deal as sec of state. $145Million poured into the Clinton foundation while she was sec of state during the 18 months while negotiating the many branches of the Uranium 1 deal most of which from overseas, Russia and the middle east.
Congress will also be launching investigation into Obama DOJ.
even the washington post finally reporting [b]"Hillary clinton's campaign and DNC PAID for the entire research for the Trump Dossier."
[/b]
lots and lots more coming. Fusion GPS is dirty as dirty. Dems and DNC have LIED to the american people. during the entire campaign. wow!!!! more coming!!
You're just a tidal wave of misinformation. This part is simply a lie. Are you going to own up for misleading people on here?
Pointgod wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:Bill Clinton's russian speaking fee paid by the bank with ties to Putin and ties to Uranium 1. Hillary approved this deal as sec of state. $145Million poured into the Clinton foundation while she was sec of state during the 18 months while negotiating the many branches of the Uranium 1 deal most of which from overseas, Russia and the middle east.
Congress will also be launching investigation into Obama DOJ.
even the washington post finally reporting [b]"Hillary clinton's campaign and DNC PAID for the entire research for the Trump Dossier."
[/b]
lots and lots more coming. Fusion GPS is dirty as dirty. Dems and DNC have LIED to the american people. during the entire campaign. wow!!!! more coming!!
You're just a tidal wave of misinformation. This part is simply a lie. Are you going to own up for misleading people on here?