mercgold3 wrote:walk with me wrote:mercgold3 wrote:6-8 with Hayward and that defense ? Nahhhhhh.
I'm sorry but that doesn't make sense.
Or you believe in Rubio or you don't trade a first round to save money or/and to just tryout Rubio for 2 years... The Jazz just got a steal in the draft with Donovan Mitchell at #13, the Lakers with Kuzma at #27 and the list goes on and on...
Keep in mind the West got better
Okc
Wolves
Clippers
Denver
All improved
Warriors
Houston
Spurs
Locked in as the top 3
Portland
New Orleans
And Utah on the outside looking in.
And they probably belong in that first group but still that first group is better then the jazz.
They went to semi finals last season with 51 wins in the regular season with a lot of injuries.
And they also got better IMO
Rubio > Hill, i know you disagree.
Udoh, Sefolosha, Donovan Mitchell, that was great additions.
And the Clippers didn't improved at all.
Portland is the same.
You can't go wrong with the Jazz defense. The problem is that they don't a lot of scoring now, Not having Gordon Hayward makes all the difference. Although i believe they still are going to win between 40-45 games, that is how good that defense is (not today tought) especially at home in Utah.
I think either way the jazz front office was looking for experience and not young talent. If you’re going to go young you might as well go full tank and try to get some 1-6 caliber guys.
Bringing Ricky in gives them an affordable 2 year try out and not a 4 year internship ( 16 pick )

















