lilfishi22 wrote:Qwigglez wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:You might get ridiculed anyway just putting that package together and suggesting it might be close to enough to get someone like Kawhi. Kawhi is an all-NBA player who's probably just hitting his prime, there's just no way you're gonna get him without a young player with star potential and picks going back. By that I mean at least Booker and our 1st as a starting point.
Yeah but at the same time, he will most certainly opt out of his contract after next season anyway, so if he really wants out, wouldn't it be best for the Spurs to trade him sooner rather than later? It's kind of similar to Kyrie wanting out, a 25 year old superstar that netted the Cavs an older pg in IT, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, and the Nets pick. The Cavs didn't get a young player with star potential, though they got IT. Josh Jackson is suppose to be the same mold as Kawhi, plus I actually feel like JJ's catch and shoot 3 is coming along nicely. If push came to shove, then I would certainly give our 2018 pick instead, but obviously the first thing you want to do is bargain and get the best deal.
If we look at the IT/Kyrie trade, I see it as Cleveland making a lateral move (PG for PG) while getting some wing help (Crowder) and what was atm a likely top 5 pick for a guy that wanted out. They got what they wanted. They didn't/couldn't get a star at another position which, to their benefit meant they didn't need to somehow backfill the star level PG they lost.
With the Spurs, when Duncan retired they slotted LMA in that role hoping to extend Pop's system. Teams with an established, winning system don't want major changes. And if they are going to trade their all-NBA wing, I'd imagine they would target a star level wing in return. Booker is the only guy who could match Kawhi's scoring. I don't think they would be interested in JJ because he's still too young and too raw. I'd imagine they would want to keep the train rolling rather than develop and see what they have in JJ. Booker is at the age imo where he's ready to learn from the best and get slotted into an offense where he can be way more efficient and on defense, be hidden by their defensive scheme.
If we can talk to the Spurs in the first instance without putting Booker on the table, that's a great start. But I'd assume the talks would start with Booker
I think Kawhi has way more trade value than Kyrie did. Kawhi is pretty much one of, if not the best defenders in the league. He already won DPOY twice and regularly is among league leaders in steals. His wingspan is enormous. His drtg is extremely low. Players like Kawhi are much harder to come by than players like Kyrie. Kyrie is in the upper tier of point guards but there isn't a huge separation between him a bunch of others. He is super clutch, but he was terrible defensively.
Then Kawhi scored 25 a game last year...and you'd think Kyrie is more efficient...but no, Kawhi was 61% or more TS% the last two years whereas Kyrie was at 58% and 54% the year before.
So yeah, of course it would be nice to offer a 2019 unprotected pick, but that pick probably isn't too good if we had Kawhi and definitely not if we had Kawhi and Booker. The 2018 pick holds more value not only because of the stacked draft, but because of that and that the pick would likely be much much higher.
If he really ever did get on the trading block, which would shock me probably more than anyone maybe ever going on the block, then I don't think we could trump other offers. The only thing that might put us in the running is with Booker and the 2018, and that doesn't make sense for 2019 pending free agent, no matter how good he is.






















