Utah trades: Jonas Jerebko, 2018 2nd
Sacramento trades: Zach Randolph
Utah gets a power forward that fits perfectly into our schemes. If Favors leaves we still have someone, if he stays we have a great 3 man rotation up front.
Sacramento gets a mid second round pick and drops some salary.
Probably has to be agreed upon on draft day but executed when salaries flip over to the next year, but still doable.
UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing
UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,441
- And1: 16,937
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
- Kings2013
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,829
- And1: 932
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
- Location: The beautiful capital of California
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Looks good
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,848
- And1: 3,364
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
If Favors stays with Utah, then the Jazz would probably need to send out more salary than Jerebko to make a trade for Zach workable.
Utah would have a stretch PF as the most likely pick in the first round?
Utah would have a stretch PF as the most likely pick in the first round?
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,550
- And1: 11,765
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Done, you can keep the 2nd.
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,441
- And1: 16,937
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Resistance wrote:If Favors stays with Utah, then the Jazz would probably need to send out more salary than Jerebko to make a trade for Zach workable.
Utah would have a stretch PF as the most likely pick in the first round?
We have an expiring Alec Burks who could be a good candidate to breakout. Had some good stretches but I also think his leg is a lot worse than we thought. Still, salary matching can be figured out, but I don't think Favors will cost too much. Expiring+2nd for Randolph is basically what we have to offer. Also I think we'd like to bring whatever rookies we get along slowly. A year of Randolph will give them time to get an NBA body while we get the other young players playoff experience.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
-
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 45,496
- And1: 26,048
- Joined: Jun 29, 2006
-
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Randolph will be 37, cost $12M, and hit fewer than one 3-pointer per game. I actually like him, but he's not exactly a guy I would rush out to acquire. Maybe if we let Favors go, find a really good fit at stretch PF first, and have some capspace left over at the end of FA.
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
- stitches
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,440
- And1: 6,880
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
-
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
Jerebko is better than Randolph. Why would we be doing this?
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,732
- And1: 11,566
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: UTA - SAC (Zach Randolph)
One more Jazz fan checking in not interested in the deal.
I bought a boat.
Return to Trades and Transactions