Luka Doncic Part III

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

Rn5ho
Junior
Posts: 408
And1: 376
Joined: Sep 10, 2014
     

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#121 » by Rn5ho » Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:44 am

UcanUwill wrote:
Bob8 wrote:Joe Ingels career stats in Euroleague,

5.6/2.7/1.7

Joe Ingles career stats in Nba,

6.7/2.8/2.6

Luka Doncic 18 years old,

17/5/4.5

How are this numbers comparable?

If Doncic will have Joe Ingles’s stats in his rookie season, he will be called a bust.


Interesting point, but does not prove stats from EL translate 1/1. I really doubt Doncic right now is 17/5/5 caliber player in the NBA, or is better than NBA vets like Turkoglu/Turner. Some of you need to set your expectations a bit lower.


I dont think he is 17/5/5 in NBA terms (though depends also on the team he would land - if they let him 15 shots per game then easily), but I think AS/REB will come pretty naturally to him. I could easily see Ball/Simmons production in this regard but again.. all depends on what team he lands. Will they let him go loose or they gonna give peiority to veterans/another ballhandler?
Bob8
RealGM
Posts: 10,993
And1: 4,606
Joined: Feb 08, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#122 » by Bob8 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:03 am

UcanUwill wrote:
Bob8 wrote:Joe Ingels career stats in Euroleague,

5.6/2.7/1.7

Joe Ingles career stats in Nba,

6.7/2.8/2.6

Luka Doncic 18 years old,

17/5/4.5

How are this numbers comparable?

If Doncic will have Joe Ingles’s stats in his rookie season, he will be called a bust.


Interesting point, but does not prove stats from EL translate 1/1. I really doubt Doncic right now is 17/5/5 caliber player in the NBA, or is better than NBA vets like Turkoglu/Turner. Some of you need to set your expectations a bit lower.


what expectations? I just show you how good is Doncic in comparison to Ingles in Euroleague. Triple in points and assists, double in rebounds and quadruple in Pir. And Ingles made that numbers being 23-26 years old. You just can’t compare this 2 players. And if you want some more realistic comparison, you have Bogdanovic with 11.6/2.8/3.4 and Teodosic, hampered by injuries, with 9.4/3/5 in their rookie season. And I’m sure he can be better than that in his rookie season. Where did you find Ingles for comparison is a mistery for me. I’m not saying that he will have 17/5/5 in his rookie season. But his career numbers for sure won’t be anywhere near Ingles’s 6.7/2.8/2.6. He was better in Eurobasket than prime Rubio. And that’s pretty impressive for 18 years old kid. It’s funny how people are saying, he’s already made player, but don’t believe he can deliver from first moment. He showed in Eurobasket that he can play with Nba talents. And he will be better next season in comparison to Eurobasket.
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#123 » by Nikson » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:04 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
Bob8 wrote:Joe Ingels career stats in Euroleague,

5.6/2.7/1.7

Joe Ingles career stats in Nba,

6.7/2.8/2.6

Luka Doncic 18 years old,

17/5/4.5

How are this numbers comparable?

If Doncic will have Joe Ingles’s stats in his rookie season, he will be called a bust.


Interesting point, but does not prove stats from EL translate 1/1. I really doubt Doncic right now is 17/5/5 caliber player in the NBA, or is better than NBA vets like Turkoglu/Turner. Some of you need to set your expectations a bit lower.

I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 33,197
And1: 36,755
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#124 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:09 pm

Nikson wrote:I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.


Every player translates differently, thats why we have scouts to begin with. But translating 17 points per game is obviously more challenging than translating 6 ppg.
Bob8
RealGM
Posts: 10,993
And1: 4,606
Joined: Feb 08, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#125 » by Bob8 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:27 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
Nikson wrote:I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.


Every player translates differently, thats why we have scouts to begin with. But translating 17 points per game is obviously more challenging than translating 6 ppg.


You have totally missed my point.
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#126 » by Nikson » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:28 pm

Bob8 wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
Nikson wrote:I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.


Every player translates differently, thats why we have scouts to begin with. But translating 17 points per game is obviously more challenging than translating 6 ppg.


You have totally missed my point.

No. He has his opinion but he doesn’t agree with it.
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#127 » by Nikson » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:32 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
Nikson wrote:I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.


Every player translates differently, thats why we have scouts to begin with. But translating 17 points per game is obviously more challenging than translating 6 ppg.

So you think Ingles has translated so his production was multiplied by 1.2 and Dončić will translate with dividing his production by more than 3?
Or what?
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 33,197
And1: 36,755
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#128 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:50 pm

Nikson wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:
Nikson wrote:I agree with you about interesting point. If it not translate 1/1, how do you think it translates?
It is sure the interesting part proves most of your opinions wrong.


Every player translates differently, thats why we have scouts to begin with. But translating 17 points per game is obviously more challenging than translating 6 ppg.

So you think Ingles has translated so his production was multiplied by 1.2 and Dončić will translate with dividing his production by more than 3?
Or what?


No, I just think that claiming Doncic is already better than very solid NBA players, is jumping a gun. His superior Euroleague stats is a poor ace in the hole IMO, yes Ingles translated very well, but we had not so successful examples as well. Macijauskas was a machine in Europe, and couldnt buy a minute in the NBA. I am not saying Doncic stats wont translate, it could translate very well, but I choose to be conservative here. I doubt he is already better player than Ingles or prime Hedo. People here underestimating NBA talent.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,138
And1: 4,192
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#129 » by daoneandonly » Tue Mar 13, 2018 4:55 pm

Yeah his ceiling is Hedo Ingles, again not a bad player at all, a guy teams would love to have, but in the mid-late first round, not a top 6 pick.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Bob8
RealGM
Posts: 10,993
And1: 4,606
Joined: Feb 08, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#130 » by Bob8 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 5:30 pm

daoneandonly wrote:Yeah his ceiling is Hedo Ingles, again not a bad player at all, a guy teams would love to have, but in the mid-late first round, not a top 6 pick.


You’re saying that stupid Americans will take mid-late first round player as #2? Can be.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,138
And1: 4,192
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#131 » by daoneandonly » Tue Mar 13, 2018 5:34 pm

Bob8 wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:Yeah his ceiling is Hedo Ingles, again not a bad player at all, a guy teams would love to have, but in the mid-late first round, not a top 6 pick.


You’re saying that stupid Americans will take mid-late first round player as #2? Can be.


Doesn't matter what their ethnicity is, when it's proven that guards from overseas don't amount to top flight superstars year after year after year, the warnings should be heeded. If Doncic was a big man okay, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Prozingas have proven they can be something incredibly special, no guard has done the same. I wouldn't put Manu or parker in that top shelf category, and they had Pop, so what about the guys that will be Pop-less? I don't want to know with a top pick.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Nikson
Junior
Posts: 402
And1: 79
Joined: Oct 21, 2017

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#132 » by Nikson » Tue Mar 13, 2018 5:42 pm

daoneandonly wrote:Yeah his ceiling is Hedo Ingles, again not a bad player at all, a guy teams would love to have, but in the mid-late first round, not a top 6 pick.

Let somehow organize to put our skin in this game. Let’s say, bet for a 100€ or $? Normally healthy, not injured Luka Dončić this year draft pick. I take numbers 1-5, you take 6 and more. I even give you this number 6 as a gift.
How about that?

Wait, did you say mid late first? Is this 20-30?
I’ll put a lot more on under 20 if you prefer?
MemphisX
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,825
And1: 3,741
Joined: Nov 10, 2011

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#133 » by MemphisX » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:17 pm

daoneandonly wrote:
Bob8 wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:Yeah his ceiling is Hedo Ingles, again not a bad player at all, a guy teams would love to have, but in the mid-late first round, not a top 6 pick.


You’re saying that stupid Americans will take mid-late first round player as #2? Can be.


Doesn't matter what their ethnicity is, when it's proven that guards from overseas don't amount to top flight superstars year after year after year, the warnings should be heeded. If Doncic was a big man okay, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Prozingas have proven they can be something incredibly special, no guard has done the same. I wouldn't put Manu or parker in that top shelf category, and they had Pop, so what about the guys that will be Pop-less? I don't want to know with a top pick.


:crazy:

Parker is 6x All Star, 4x All NBA and Finals MVP. Manu is 2x All Star and 2x All NBA. If Doncic repeats either of those, he would be a successful pick even at #1.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,138
And1: 4,192
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#134 » by daoneandonly » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:22 pm

MemphisX wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:
Bob8 wrote:
You’re saying that stupid Americans will take mid-late first round player as #2? Can be.


Doesn't matter what their ethnicity is, when it's proven that guards from overseas don't amount to top flight superstars year after year after year, the warnings should be heeded. If Doncic was a big man okay, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Prozingas have proven they can be something incredibly special, no guard has done the same. I wouldn't put Manu or parker in that top shelf category, and they had Pop, so what about the guys that will be Pop-less? I don't want to know with a top pick.


:crazy:

Parker is 6x All Star, 4x All NBA and Finals MVP. Manu is 2x All Star and 2x All NBA. If Doncic repeats either of those, he would be a successful pick even at #1.


Perhaps I'm too demanding, but I expect more given the hype Doncic is getting. parker and Manu were drafted late, so that factors in, but let's not ignore the fact that much of that came with playing next to the greatest PF of all time. Do you really think they'd be in that stratosphere without Duncan? I don't.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,513
And1: 3,027
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#135 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:26 pm

UcanUwill wrote:I have no doubt Evan Turner would be a big star in Euroleague. He is 6'7 athlete with great PG skills, he would be Euroleague MVP contender easily. Just look how good he has looked in inferior competitions in the past. He dominated college and he looked great in those NBA Europe live games against European teams. Evan Turner is a damn good player, who now stuck in a bad situation, whenever he gets a chance at playmaking, he looks great, even when he is inferior athlete on the court. Put him against Euroleague teams, where he actually has athletic advantage and hes a superstar.

Joe Ingles was a role player in Europe yes, but he is a different player now. I can name probably 60 players who look better in Euroleague than what Ingles looked, but does that mean all these players would be better in the NBA than what Ingles looks now? Of course not, not even close.


Evan Turner is like a poor man's version of Shved. He's a less athletic, much worse shooting version of Shved. No way in hell would he ever sniff a EuroLeague MVP.

You underrate the EuroLeague to a huge degree. Sorry, but you just do. I know you will come back with a response as always about how I extremely overrate EuroLegaue, and hate NBA and all that.

Yet I am dead on to 100% on every single player that has left Europe and come to NBA. I have been 100% correct on every single one of them, and my posts in these forum sare a record of that. I am simply objective about the difference between EuroLeague and NBA.

Evan Turner will be less athletic in EuroLeague, not more. Less athletic because of the rules and reffing differences. Evan Turner really can't shoot - which is a huge flaw for a EuroLeague perimeter player. Turner needs the ball in his hands to be effective, but he's not a lead play maker, and most EuroLeague teams have main ball handlers that are much better creators and play makers than him.

Evan Turner...imagine Papaloukas with a way lower basketball IQ, way less play making ability, much worse passing skills, and way worse court vision.....that's what Evan Turner would be in EuroLeague.

He wouldn't be jack in EuroLeague, and you say he is comparable to Doncic. No way, no way. At least when people mention Ingles, at least it's a guy that can shoot, and that does not need the ball to be useful. Doncic is miles above Evan Turner.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 33,197
And1: 36,755
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#136 » by UcanUwill » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:35 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:I have no doubt Evan Turner would be a big star in Euroleague. He is 6'7 athlete with great PG skills, he would be Euroleague MVP contender easily. Just look how good he has looked in inferior competitions in the past. He dominated college and he looked great in those NBA Europe live games against European teams. Evan Turner is a damn good player, who now stuck in a bad situation, whenever he gets a chance at playmaking, he looks great, even when he is inferior athlete on the court. Put him against Euroleague teams, where he actually has athletic advantage and hes a superstar.

Joe Ingles was a role player in Europe yes, but he is a different player now. I can name probably 60 players who look better in Euroleague than what Ingles looked, but does that mean all these players would be better in the NBA than what Ingles looks now? Of course not, not even close.


Evan Turner is like a poor man's version of Shved. He's a less athletic, much worse shooting version of Shved. No way in hell would he ever sniff a EuroLeague MVP.

You underrate the EuroLeague to a huge degree. Sorry, but you just do.


Evan Turner is easily better than Shved. And how is Shved more athletic, dont make me laugh, Turner is bigger, much stronger, way better explosiveness, and guy actually has high IQ and is NBA caliber playmaker. Shved is just a chucker who gets away with it because he is more talented than your Euroleague scrub. At NBA level hes got nothing. Turner would be Euroleague savant who would flat out dominate lesser athletes inside. I dont see the similarity at all.

I agree that his lack of shooting is a flaw, but he is better than McCalleb or Calathes. He would be much bigger Calathes in the Euroleague, that what he would be. Shved is a joke of the comparison.
And he would not look less athletic in Europe, Alan Anderson was a damn good athlete in Euroleague, and he is less athletic in the NBA than Turner.
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,513
And1: 3,027
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#137 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:46 pm

daoneandonly wrote:Doesn't matter what their ethnicity is, when it's proven that guards from overseas don't amount to top flight superstars year after year after year, the warnings should be heeded. If Doncic was a big man okay, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Prozingas have proven they can be something incredibly special, no guard has done the same. I wouldn't put Manu or parker in that top shelf category, and they had Pop, so what about the guys that will be Pop-less? I don't want to know with a top pick.


You keep saying this. It isn't true. Plenty of "guards from overseas" were good NBA players. In the last thread we listed a whole bunch of examples. It's a myth from NBA only fans and an untrue myth. Just because you keep saying no "overseas guard" was a good NBA player does not make it true. There have been numerous good guards in NBA that were not Americans.

That was already discussed and that myth already debunked in the previous thread. Actually, in many cases the European guards were better NBA players than they were EuroLeague/European players.
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,138
And1: 4,192
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#138 » by daoneandonly » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:48 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:I have no doubt Evan Turner would be a big star in Euroleague. He is 6'7 athlete with great PG skills, he would be Euroleague MVP contender easily. Just look how good he has looked in inferior competitions in the past. He dominated college and he looked great in those NBA Europe live games against European teams. Evan Turner is a damn good player, who now stuck in a bad situation, whenever he gets a chance at playmaking, he looks great, even when he is inferior athlete on the court. Put him against Euroleague teams, where he actually has athletic advantage and hes a superstar.

Joe Ingles was a role player in Europe yes, but he is a different player now. I can name probably 60 players who look better in Euroleague than what Ingles looked, but does that mean all these players would be better in the NBA than what Ingles looks now? Of course not, not even close.


Evan Turner is like a poor man's version of Shved. He's a less athletic, much worse shooting version of Shved. No way in hell would he ever sniff a EuroLeague MVP.

You underrate the EuroLeague to a huge degree. Sorry, but you just do. I know you will come back with a response as always about how I extremely overrate EuroLegaue, and hate NBA and all that.

Yet I am dead on to 100% on every single player that has left Europe and come to NBA. I have been 100% correct on every single one of them, and my posts in these forum sare a record of that. I am simply objective about the difference between EuroLeague and NBA.

Evan Turner will be less athletic in EuroLeague, not more. Less athletic because of the rules and reffing differences. Evan Turner really can't shoot - which is a huge flaw for a EuroLeague perimeter player. Turner needs the ball in his hands to be effective, but he's not a lead play maker, and most EuroLeague teams have main ball handlers that are much better creators and play makers than him.

Evan Turner...imagine Papaloukas with a way lower basketball IQ, way less play making ability, much worse passing skills, and way worse court vision.....that's what Evan Turner would be in EuroLeague.

He wouldn't be jack in EuroLeague, and you say he is comparable to Doncic. No way, no way. At least when people mention Ingles, at least it's a guy that can shoot, and that does not need the ball to be useful. Doncic is miles above Evan Turner.


I remember you mentioning Antoine Rigadeau in high regard, the guy was complete trash and utterly non existent on the Mavs, what do you attribute that to? It's not like they had the sorry cluster of talent they do now, they were a solid team then and he had opportunity to learn, grow, and play with Dirk, he sucked
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 16,138
And1: 4,192
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#139 » by daoneandonly » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:50 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
daoneandonly wrote:Doesn't matter what their ethnicity is, when it's proven that guards from overseas don't amount to top flight superstars year after year after year, the warnings should be heeded. If Doncic was a big man okay, Dirk, Giannis, Jokic, Prozingas have proven they can be something incredibly special, no guard has done the same. I wouldn't put Manu or parker in that top shelf category, and they had Pop, so what about the guys that will be Pop-less? I don't want to know with a top pick.


You keep saying this. It isn't true. Plenty of "guards from overseas" were good NBA players. In the last thread we listed a whole bunch of examples. It's a myth from NBA only fans and an untrue myth. Just because you keep saying no "overseas guard" was a good NBA player does not make it true. There have been numerous good guards in NBA that were not Americans.

That was already discussed and that myth already debunked in the previous thread. Actually, in many cases the European guards were better NBA players than they were EuroLeague/European players.


I didn't say none became good, I said none became superstars like their big counterparts in Dirk, Giannis, and maybe even include Jokic and Porzingas in that soon enough. And you also think Antoine Rigadeau was good, so that hurts your argument a lot
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,513
And1: 3,027
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Luka Doncic Part III 

Post#140 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:50 pm

UcanUwill wrote:Evan Turner is easily better than Shved. And how is Shved more athletic, dont make me laugh, Turner is bigger, much stronger, way better explosiveness, and guy actually has high IQ and is NBA caliber playmaker. Shved is just a chucker who gets away with it because he is more talented than your Euroleague scrub. At NBA level hes got nothing. Turner would be Euroleague savant who would flat out dominate lesser athletes inside. I dont see the similarity at all.

I agree that his lack of shooting is a flaw, but he is better than McCalleb or Calathes. He would be much bigger Calathes in the Euroleague, that what he would be. Shved is a joke of the comparison.
And he would not look less athletic in Europe, Alan Anderson was a damn good athlete in Euroleague, and he is less athletic in the NBA than Turner.


See, these kinds of posts make me seriously doubt you actually watch EuroLeague. Evan Turner is probably a top 10 worst example you could ever come up with for a guy going from NBA to EuroLeague. He would be a very high bust risk for any EuroLeague team that signed him.

Doncic is way better than Joe Ingles. He's way better than Hedo, way, way better than Hedo. But at least I can see some reasoning in how you came to those comparisons. Evan Turner...no. Doncic is so much better it's an outright gigantic insult.

And Shved is definitely better than Turner.

Shved is a better passer, better court vision, better ball handler, much better shooter, better scorer, better one to one player, much more athletic....

What does Turner have on Shved? He's got better shot selection and he's a better team player. That's it. On an individual level, Shved is not only better at everything, he's actually a hell of a lot better at everything.

I know you say you watch EuroLeague, but I just have to doubt it.

Can we at least make fair and accurate comparisons here?

Hedo
Ingles
Turner

Why are we even discussing players like these? Doncic is so superior to all three of them. It just makes the thread seem outright ridiculous. Let's please make comparisons that are at least somewhat in the same ballpark, in terms of the level of the players.

About EuroLeague...McCalebb and Calathes are/were not even good EuroLeague players. You act like they are stars or something. McCalebb could never do anything but attack in the open court, and Calathes can do nothing but dominate a ball for 40 minutes.

At their peaks, we are talking top 15 EuroLeague point guards. Something people that closely watch EuroLeague would know. Something people that don't watch EuroLeague would just casually throw their names out as "stars". Just like back in the day no matter what people claimed Parker and Langdon were the best players Europe ever saw. It's just NBA only fans talking points, and nothing anyone that closely watch the league would actually believe.

Alan Anderson..he's one of the lowest IQ players that ever set foot on a EuroLeague court. He's a skilled one on one player, and has a natural scoring ability. Kudos to him for being a rotation player in NBA for years. But he's one of the biggest detriments of any player to whatever team he is on that there is. Every team is worse for having him. We don't even get examples of players that were even good in EuroLeague in this thread, being mentioned all these average kinds of players, in comparison to Doncic. It's gotten really tiresome.

If people talked about American players the same way, and only compared average players to the best American players, saying "LeBron in Europe would be Kostas Papanikoloau at best", the posters saying that would get banned I am sure. But doing the same here, "Doncic is like Turner or Ingles or Hedo" - and it's somehow objective posting? The double standards NBA fans put to any European that plays in Europe is truly unbelievable.

Return to NBA Draft