ArodpwnsFavre wrote:What a horrible program.
For letting Hauser play in the NIT with a bum hip?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
ArodpwnsFavre wrote:What a horrible program.
Thunder Muscle wrote:ArodpwnsFavre wrote:What a horrible program.
For letting Hauser play in the NIT with a bum hip?
Mags FTW wrote:DingleJerry wrote:Is the game the same night as a Bucks game? Otherwise you'd think they'd have found a way to use the BC, make a deal somehow
Only 3200 people showed up to MU’s last NIT game. No reason to use the BC.
Johnlac1 wrote:Mags FTW wrote:DingleJerry wrote:Is the game the same night as a Bucks game? Otherwise you'd think they'd have found a way to use the BC, make a deal somehow
Only 3200 people showed up to MU’s last NIT game. No reason to use the BC.
It's really a "who cares" situation. All the teams in the NIT couldn't make a field of 64 or 68. It's not like the old days where conference champs like in the ACC could get aced out of the NCAA tourney if they lost their conf. tournament and then the NIT was the only option. Some of the teams that got beat in the ACC tourneys from the early seventies could have given UCLA a good battle.
Many other excellent NCAA-worthy teams in major conferences who didn't finish as conference champs got screwed while weaker conf. champs from the mid and lower majors got in. Plus, all the games were in Madison Square Garden, and many teams and great players were seen nationally for the first time.
Things are different now. It's basically a loser's tournament.