LordCovington33 wrote:
off ball foul on Simmons ... definitely pulling him away from the play
Simmons is holding Tatum just as much as Tatum holding Simmons because Simmons thought the play might have been for Tatum.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
LordCovington33 wrote:
off ball foul on Simmons ... definitely pulling him away from the play
NY 567 wrote: that won't change the fact that Tatum is mediocre as hell and that Ainge is dumb enough to give average starters with no upside like Tatum and Brown max contracts. That's worse than Isiah Thomas level dumb
Darth Celtic wrote:Went through 15 pages to see what superdario had to say about this game. nothing.
NY 567 wrote: that won't change the fact that Tatum is mediocre as hell and that Ainge is dumb enough to give average starters with no upside like Tatum and Brown max contracts. That's worse than Isiah Thomas level dumb
PierceFan4ever wrote:Superdario still somewhere out there thinking that Saric is close to Hayward as a player, Simmons is still magic and Embiid is still Kareem. Bless that man
PierceFan4ever wrote:Can someone explain to me how a generally good Heat defense were giving up 120-130 points to these Sixers? I know Celtics have the #1 ranked defense but how was Miami’s defense so bad that first round?

PierceFan4ever wrote:Can someone explain to me how a generally good Heat defense were giving up 120-130 points to these Sixers? I know Celtics have the #1 ranked defense but how was Miami’s defense so bad that first round?

Stanford wrote:PierceFan4ever wrote:Can someone explain to me how a generally good Heat defense were giving up 120-130 points to these Sixers? I know Celtics have the #1 ranked defense but how was Miami’s defense so bad that first round?
This team is playing as bad as they have all season. Miami was able to control the pace and Philly still scored. You're not giving them credit as an offensive team, because of course you're not.

kingofthecourt67 wrote:Stanford wrote:PierceFan4ever wrote:Can someone explain to me how a generally good Heat defense were giving up 120-130 points to these Sixers? I know Celtics have the #1 ranked defense but how was Miami’s defense so bad that first round?
This team is playing as bad as they have all season. Miami was able to control the pace and Philly still scored. You're not giving them credit as an offensive team, because of course you're not.
Careful..you're on the verge of needing to be humbled.

Stanford wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:Stanford wrote:
This team is playing as bad as they have all season. Miami was able to control the pace and Philly still scored. You're not giving them credit as an offensive team, because of course you're not.
Careful..you're on the verge of needing to be humbled.
I'm out of control, kotc. I need help.
CobraCommander wrote:soxfan2003 wrote:CobraCommander wrote:
Forget your metrics...Simmons and Embiid had people saying they were going to the finals. The Celtics have fine players...the sixers have transcended talent. Jingles is right...period...think this...would anyone take Kyrie and Hayward over Embiid and Simmons? No..so next year if these teams meet the sixers may have the two best players in that series.![]()
I respect the 76ers potential but I see Simmons much, much closer to Lamar Odom -- who did deserve to make an all-star team if the NBA was selecting best 24 players each year -- in talent than Lebron. And obviously LO without his off the court problems would have been even better. LO was really good so this is no major diss.
And I see Embiid as a more talented Robert Parish but in an NBA where bigs are devalued a little bit and not another Hakeem type player. Hakeem just more explosive/quicker and that is more important than Embiid's edge in size. Parish had a great career but he was 2 levels down from Hakeem. Embiid's potential is probably 1 level down from Hakeem and that isn't transcendent. Top 10 player potential? Sure. Shaq/Hakeem/Robinson/Duncan/KG potential, I am not seeing it.
I don't see any "trancendent" talent on 76ers or Celtics. Tatum can be a HOFer and better than Embiid or Simmons but I don't see him as trancendent. To be quite honest, with what I have seen out of Tatum I wouldn't risk trading him right now for pretty much any NBA player 25 and under not named Anthony Davis. Simmons has more potential than Tatum if he develops into a very good all around shooter, I just wouldn't take that gamble in Celtics position especially.
In an NBA pre 3 point line, I'd rather have Embiid than Tatum but we are no longer in that league.
You lost me at Simmons being closers to LO.... Either way...i respect your option but I dont see it that way. I dont think LO would be considered in the same conversation with Lebron and Magic coming into the league. I see Embiid being maybe the second coming of the dream ...with a 3...but bigger...with less humility.
Stanford wrote:PierceFan4ever wrote:Can someone explain to me how a generally good Heat defense were giving up 120-130 points to these Sixers? I know Celtics have the #1 ranked defense but how was Miami’s defense so bad that first round?
This team is playing as bad as they have all season. Miami was able to control the pace and Philly still scored. You're not giving them credit as an offensive team, because of course you're not.
PierceFan4ever wrote:Rookies in the semifinals
Mitchell 48 points on 19/59 shooting
Simmons 35 points on 14/29 shooting
Tatum 73 points on 31/47 shooting
Mitchell 18 months older, Simmons 20 months older than JT
Crazy.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Andy123 wrote:PierceFan4ever wrote:Rookies in the semifinals
Mitchell 48 points on 19/59 shooting
Simmons 35 points on 14/29 shooting
Tatum 73 points on 31/47 shooting
Mitchell 18 months older, Simmons 20 months older than JT
Crazy.
Simmons isn't a scorer, plus a years difference is not a big deal..
Andy123 wrote:PierceFan4ever wrote:Rookies in the semifinals
Mitchell 48 points on 19/59 shooting
Simmons 35 points on 14/29 shooting
Tatum 73 points on 31/47 shooting
Mitchell 18 months older, Simmons 20 months older than JT
Crazy.
Simmons isn't a scorer, plus a years difference is not a big deal..

kingofthecourt67 wrote:Stanford wrote:kingofthecourt67 wrote:
Careful..you're on the verge of needing to be humbled.
I'm out of control, kotc. I need help.
![]()
Just make sure you don't predict a victory next game or there will be a mob out for you