Jay10 wrote:Would you trade #9 for De'Aaron Fox?
Listening to Bill Simmons' podcast and he brought up the idea.
I definitely would NOT
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Jay10 wrote:Would you trade #9 for De'Aaron Fox?
Listening to Bill Simmons' podcast and he brought up the idea.
FrontOfficeEye wrote:DrCoach wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
Being young doesn’t necessarily indicate potential. Folks were gaga over Mudiay because he was young. His workouts are very meh
Knox avg 15pg at 18yrs old for a top program, THAT indicates potential
Brandon Knight averaged 17, 4, 4 for Kentucky.
K P 6 wrote:Not gunna lie. The facts Knox would be 22 in 3 years is kind of tempting. Then again if Kp was 25 now would we really be upset ?
Jay10 wrote:Bill Simmons also brought up something a few people around here haven't paid close attention to:
Mikal will be turn 22 in 2 months.
Knox will turn 22 in 3 years.
Don't you think Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal?
Both Bill Simmons and Kevin O'Connor say Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal at 22 years old.
K P 6 wrote:Not gunna lie. The facts Knox would be 22 in 3 years is kind of tempting. Then again if Kp was 25 now would we really be upset ?
blanko wrote:Bottom line is this. We arent gonna be good this year and will be in the lottery again. You dont want a shane battier imho. You can find 3 and D guys who are 6'6. What is much harder to find is combo forwards with the potential of knox. You draft on potential. Who is going to be better 2-3 years later? If we were a playoff team I understand taking the safe pick. But we are not. I'm ok with mikal, I want to make sure I make that clear. However I perfer a higher upside prospect. Emila okafor and shane battier are nice players, but in the lottery you go for thr guy with the highest upside. At least in my opinion.
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
DrCoach wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:DrCoach wrote:
Knox avg 15pg at 18yrs old for a top program, THAT indicates potential
Brandon Knight averaged 17, 4, 4 for Kentucky.
Yep, which is why he was a lotto pick, a starting NBA guard, and signed a 5yr 70 mil contract
He tore his knee. Something that no one can predict.FrontOfficeEye wrote:DrCoach wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:
Brandon Knight averaged 17, 4, 4 for Kentucky.
Yep, which is why he was a lotto pick, a starting NBA guard, and signed a 5yr 70 mil contract
Did well for himself, but he did not pan out.
Most young players have attention issues. One thing I think about fizdale he is going to givr the kind of discipline that our young players need. (Especially mudiay, if fiz can't fix him he is a lost cause)earthmansurfer wrote:Jay10 wrote:Bill Simmons also brought up something a few people around here haven't paid close attention to:
Mikal will be turn 22 in 2 months.
Knox will turn 22 in 3 years.
Don't you think Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal?
Both Bill Simmons and Kevin O'Connor say Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal at 22 years old.
Knox‘s questions are not talent related . They are more drive relate (taking plays off and such).
blanko wrote:He tore his knee. Something that no one can predict.FrontOfficeEye wrote:DrCoach wrote:
Yep, which is why he was a lotto pick, a starting NBA guard, and signed a 5yr 70 mil contract
Did well for himself, but he did not pan out.
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk

Fat Kat wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:![]()
Edit, this is tough... Damn
C: Reed -$4
PF: Mason- $2
SF: Chandler -$1
G: Starks -$3
G: Clyde -$5
$4 row beats $5 row in a five game series
blanko wrote:Bottom line is this. We arent gonna be good this year and will be in the lottery again. You dont want a shane battier imho. You can find 3 and D guys who are 6'6. What is much harder to find is combo forwards with the potential of knox. You draft on potential. Who is going to be better 2-3 years later? If we were a playoff team I understand taking the safe pick. But we are not. I'm ok with mikal, I want to make sure I make that clear. However I perfer a higher upside prospect. Emila okafor and shane battier are nice players, but in the lottery you go for thr guy with the highest upside. At least in my opinion.
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
newyorker4ever wrote:
blanko wrote:Most young players have attention issues. One thing I think about fizdale he is going to givr the kind of discipline that our young players need. (Especially mudiay, if fiz can't fix him he is a lost cause)earthmansurfer wrote:Jay10 wrote:Bill Simmons also brought up something a few people around here haven't paid close attention to:
Mikal will be turn 22 in 2 months.
Knox will turn 22 in 3 years.
Don't you think Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal?
Both Bill Simmons and Kevin O'Connor say Knox will be better at 22 than Mikal at 22 years old.
Knox‘s questions are not talent related . They are more drive relate (taking plays off and such).
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk