holv03 wrote:Bulls will most likely match this offer. I know it's $78M but this is what happens when you try to play hard ball. If you didn't want to overpay they could off just traded him for an asset. Maybe someone like Buddy Hield.
Not sure why SAC would do that. Hield is much cheaper, and Lavine would have been an RFA.
I think the Bulls played this just right- they tested him out last year, got to see that he wasn't all that good, and thus saved themselves from having to overcommit to someone on a long term contract. If they could have retained him on the cheap, great. If someone offered him a huge deal like this, you let him go. Not that big of a loss.
This talk about all his "talent" just means that he occasionally can make a spectacular play. Big deal- so could Jamal Crawford. It's consistency and efficiency that matter in the nba, and he was neither.























