Smitson wrote:Nets got DLO and already dumped Moz, all for a late first.
It’s the Nets easily.
Nets got DLO and the Lakers got LeBron James and Kyle Kuzma. And yet "it's the Nets easily".
We gotchu.
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
Smitson wrote:Nets got DLO and already dumped Moz, all for a late first.
It’s the Nets easily.
TheRealKaboom wrote:Smitson wrote:Nets got DLO and already dumped Moz, all for a late first.
It’s the Nets easily.
Nets got DLO and the Lakers got LeBron James and Kyle Kuzma. And yet "it's the Nets easily".
We gotchu.
Smitson wrote:TheRealKaboom wrote:Smitson wrote:Nets got DLO and already dumped Moz, all for a late first.
It’s the Nets easily.
Nets got DLO and the Lakers got LeBron James and Kyle Kuzma. And yet "it's the Nets easily".
We gotchu.
Strange I don’t recall LeBron being involved in the trade .
loserX wrote:I renew my usual objection that no one cares about
Picking Kuzma with #27 was independent of the trade, and you shouldn't use it to go back and re-evaluate the trade after the fact. (If the Lakers had instead drafted a complete bust, it wouldn't make the trade retroactively any worse, either.)
If you trade your $20,000 car for a $2 scratch-and-win ticket, that's a bad trade...even if the ticket is a winner. You could have traded the car for $20,000 and still bought that ticket; no matter whether you won or lost, you're down $19,998 from where you should be.
Don't conflate independent events! The Lakers winning by getting great value for #27 doesn't affect whether the original trade is better or worse.
baldur wrote:loserX wrote:I renew my usual objection that no one cares about
Picking Kuzma with #27 was independent of the trade, and you shouldn't use it to go back and re-evaluate the trade after the fact. (If the Lakers had instead drafted a complete bust, it wouldn't make the trade retroactively any worse, either.)
If you trade your $20,000 car for a $2 scratch-and-win ticket, that's a bad trade...even if the ticket is a winner. You could have traded the car for $20,000 and still bought that ticket; no matter whether you won or lost, you're down $19,998 from where you should be.
Don't conflate independent events! The Lakers winning by getting great value for #27 doesn't affect whether the original trade is better or worse.
I regretted voting for la after reading this.
getitdone323 wrote:Lebron would not be a laker if Maglinka did not make this trade. The still have flexibility to trade or sign another or multiple player next year.
Lock this thread.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
loserX wrote:I renew my usual objection that no one cares about
Picking Kuzma with #27 was independent of the trade, and you shouldn't use it to go back and re-evaluate the trade after the fact. (If the Lakers had instead drafted a complete bust, it wouldn't make the trade retroactively any worse, either.)
If you trade your $20,000 car for a $2 scratch-and-win ticket, that's a bad trade...even if the ticket is a winner. You could have traded the car for $20,000 and still bought that ticket; no matter whether you won or lost, you're down $19,998 from where you should be.
Don't conflate independent events! The Lakers winning by getting great value for #27 doesn't affect whether the original trade is better or worse.
Joest2003 wrote:Lakers got rid of the snitch. The value of that is priceless.
I remember ppl saying that everyone will forget about him snitching on Nick Young. Well it's now years later and it's still the first thing I think about when I see Dlo. I'm sure the rest of the league feel s the same way.