HarthorneWingo wrote:GONYK wrote:Greg Monroe just signed a 1 yr deal for $2.2M. That is what Kanter is worth.
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
HarthorneWingo wrote:GONYK wrote:Greg Monroe just signed a 1 yr deal for $2.2M. That is what Kanter is worth.
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:GONYK wrote:Greg Monroe just signed a 1 yr deal for $2.2M. That is what Kanter is worth.
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
Sark wrote:GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
The market for bigs is completely suppressed right now. Cousins only got a $5m deal in this market.
Sark wrote:GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
The market for bigs is completely suppressed right now. Cousins only got a $5m deal in this market.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Sark wrote:GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
That's extremely overly harsh. Nez is better than that bum.
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
The market for bigs is completely suppressed right now. Cousins only got a $5m deal in this market.
Nazrmohamed wrote:knicksh20b wrote:If Kanter can't stay on the floor in crunch time, he shouldn't be paid starter money
I agree to the effect that he shouldn't be paid starter money regardless but we did lose all those games. It's not like we benched him and then all of a sudden we were in contention. I never got that either when Jeff would do it but hey, I wanted to tank anyway. Often times I'd watch Kanter beasting all game and that's not to say we were going to secure a win either, but we'd be in the mix for a win and then seemingly outta nowhere it's like Hornicek looks at his watch and said "time to bench Kanter" regardless of how he was playing all game.
So what I'm saying is I don't believe Kanter was benched because he gave us a worse chance of winning, he was benched cause he gave us a good chance of winning....or at least a decent chance. I think the whole thing of we're doing it for defense was bull. And yeah I get he isn't a good defender but he's always a bad defender. Why in that moment consistently do it?
Again, Idc. I just wouldn't take too many lessons from whatever we did in the second half of the year outside of maybe development
dakomish23 wrote:Sark wrote:GONYK wrote:
Maybe twice as good. So I'll give him $4M.
The market for bigs is completely suppressed right now. Cousins only got a $5m deal in this market.
And he’s at least twice as good as Kanter, so 2.5?
Fat Kat wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Jay10 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
This sure looks like a Knicks reunion.
Cleanthony Early is the person that gets the pass from Frank when the video starts.
AllanHoustonFan wrote:Jay10 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
This sure looks like a Knicks reunion.
Cleanthony Early is the person that gets the pass from Frank when the video starts.
I think I see Da Gawd in red too