gardenofsound wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:bigworld2017 wrote:I would not trade Portis. Too young. Too much potential. The only trades I'd like to see made are RoLo and perhaps Holiday for draft choices. Even 2nd rounders. That would free up more playing time for Portis and Valentine. I want to see what both of these young guys can do over a full season, with consistent meaningful minutes, in games we are not trying to lose.
amen.
I'm baffled why people would want to trade him like for a mid first for example, what would the hope be? Maybe the mid first in a couple of years could be nearly as good as he is now? No thanks, keep him, pay him, try to win (vs lose) and re-evaluate in the offseason. Rolo and Holiday sure, or more likely situation is to just let them expire if they don't fit in the long term plans.
If portis is traded it must be for equal talent that is a better fit, not for future cap space, i'm tired of that.
If BP continues his developmental trajectory, he will command upwards of $12mm as an RFA. Consider the Bulls' strengths, weaknesses, and gluts right now. We have our long term starting bigs already more or less determined to be Lauri and Wendell. Should we really be paying this much money on a bench big?
I argue we shouldn't. That money should be used to address an area of weakness. I'd rather spend that money on a PG/wing 6th man type of player. There will be other vet bigs on the market or available in the draft who can fill out our bench for much cheaper and be effective. Robert Williams just went in the late 20's, and he's exactly the type of player/pick the Bulls should be going for.
Well said. Bobby is a guy I'd want to keep, but IMO it comes down to the me that the opportunity cost of keeping him is losing the opportunity to sign a second impact FA.
















