nate33 wrote:barelyawake wrote: let’s try to actually give Wall the tools he needs, for once, and actually go “all in,” for once.
That sounds great in theory, but the problem is we literally have nothing to offer in a trade except Brown and future picks. Going further into the tax is just not an option, the financial costs are too high. And I'll say it before PIF jumps in: we can't keep sacrificing future picks in win-now deals because it's those picks that give us the cheap players - players we need on the roster so we don't have to keep trading even more picks to save salary.
We have plenty to trade, for the right deal. Tristan is not going to cost much. And yes, trading future picks means we give up future cheap players. Balance that against the plummeting trade value of our current players (when losing); the cheap vets who clamor to winning teams; and the increased trade value of winning players. How much more would we get for Otto if we were a winning franchise currently?
We also have to think addition by subtraction. Which players off the team would heal the locker room? Which players in their place would help heal the chemistry? Which players if traded (Rivers) would be replaced by better players on our bench, thus making them happier and upping their trade value?
We need a mobile big with leadership skills. I’d love for that to be MIllsap or a Gasol, but Tristan will do. But, it needs to happen for this team to live up to potential. That potential will be higher with Howard, but it will still be decreasing from what it could have been with the type of player I, and Wall, has been begging for. We can go a little deeper into the tax, next year, if we get value back that will push our talent to higher trade levels. Then, after winning, deal with the tax — at Allstar or during the off-season. That is going all in.