Fake Trade Thread

countryboi · Post #1801 » by **countryboi** » Wed Nov 7, 2018 6:17 pm

amcoolio wrote:Really sucks Washington is in our division. I would offer a godfather package for Beal or Porter.

I would take Beal in a second.....as much as I like MKG, Beal is the player we should have drafted

316Hornets · Post #1802 » by **316Hornets** » Wed Nov 7, 2018 8:31 pm

No trades. This team is a top 4 seed if everybody plays up to their potential. Marv shot off some rust last night and that's all Kemba needs is one other guy to shoulder some of the points load.

Benjamin Linus · Post #1803 » by **Benjamin Linus** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 11:15 am

The 'Mitch Kupchak becomes a madman and goes all-in' trade

Batum, Monk, and a first for Beal
MKG, Cody, and a first for Butler
Marvin and Bridges for Aaron Gordon

Kemba-Beal-Butler-Gordon-Biz
(or)
Kemba-Beal-Lamb-Butler-Gordon

bravor · Post #1804 » by **bravor** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 11:26 am

For now the most important is to find good expiring for MKG/Lamb/Marvin or even Cody (between Vucevic, Lopez, J. Green, T. Young, Matthews and alike).
MKG/Frank for Simmons/Vucevic (+ their big i mentioned the other) day would work btw.

#restore flexibility

Nothing will happen concerning Batum, don't need to waste time. Things will get way easier (and hopefully with good return) next year.

MasterIchiro · Post #1805 » by **MasterIchiro** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 2:16 pm

I kind of like the idea of Cody for Vuc expiring. It means Willy next year but Cody has peaked and Willy still has upside. Clifford would probably love to have him back.

Post #1806 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 2:56 pm

Memphis needs a back up C.

Trade them Kaminksy for a future 1st.

LofJ · Post #1807 » by **LofJ** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 3:11 pm

BigSlam wrote:Memphis needs a back up C.

Trade them Kaminksy for a future 1st.

I wish, if Frank was worth a future 1st he would have been traded back in July.

Post #1808 » by **BigSlam** » Thu Nov 8, 2018 5:33 pm

LofJ wrote:
BigSlam wrote:Memphis needs a back up C.

Trade them Kaminksy for a future 1st.

I wish, if Frank was worth a future 1st he would have been traded back in July.

I doubt you'd get a top 10 or even a lottery pick for him, but I would hope you could still wrangle a pick in the 25-30 range.

bravor · Post #1809 » by **bravor** » Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:57 pm

Since Philly just lost Saric and Covington with the Butler trade, imo Chandler could be available.

Marvin for Chandler would work, and you could sweaten the deal by adding a 2nd pick or even by adding Bacon (since they could use another wing). Marvin is a servicable vet, a 3D that would replace what Saric and covington were bringing on a reasonable contract.

For the Hornets the interest is geting a veteran wing that can play on both ends at a decent level and above all, move Marvin off the book for next season (Chandler is on an expiring for 12Mish).

Kemba - Parker - Graham
Lamb - Monk
Batum - Chandler
MKG - Miles - Frank
Cody - Willy - Biyombo

BeesWax · Post #1810 » by **BeesWax** » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:04 pm

bravor wrote:Since Philly just lost Saric and Covington with the Butler trade, imo Chandler could be available.

Marvin for Chandler would work, and you could sweaten the deal by adding a 2nd pick or even by adding Bacon (since they could use another wing). Marvin is a servicable vet, a 3D that would replace what Saric and covington were bringing on a reasonable contract.

For the Hornets the interest is geting a veteran wing that can play on both ends at a decent level and above all, move Marvin off the book for next season (Chandler is on an expiring for 12Mish).

Kemba - Parker - Graham
Lamb - Monk
Batum - Chandler
MKG - Miles - Frank
Cody - Willy - Biyombo

I would be interested in seeing what it might cost us to get Fultz. If something like Lamb and Frank does it than I would be all in on our staff fixing his problems. He is such a poor fit with the rest of their team right now and they need shooting. If we can land some talented but damaged goods for pieces we likely can't keep next season anyway I think we need to try.

Vanderbilt_Grad · Post #1811 » by **Vanderbilt_Grad** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:51 pm

0 interest in Fultz.

LofJ · Post #1812 » by **LofJ** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:05 pm

Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:0 interest in Fultz.

We need a guard that can defend. Fultz is massively disappointing on offense, but he's a good defender and a decent passer. If we can get him for Lamb and a draft asset I wouldn't be opposed, but we'd have to line up another trade to add more offense to the team if we intended to give him Lamb's minutes.

That said I think our main trade target should be Gallinari. If we can find a third team to send the Clippers an expiring contract I think we could get him relatively cheaply.

amcoolio · Post #1813 » by **amcoolio** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:27 pm

Fultz is unplayable on this team with Cody Zeller and MKG in the rotation

Hard pass

BeesWax · Post #1814 » by **BeesWax** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 4:59 pm

LofJ wrote:
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:0 interest in Fultz.

We need a guard that can defend. Fultz is massively disappointing on offense, but he's a good defender and a decent passer. If we can get him for Lamb and a draft asset I wouldn't be opposed, but we'd have to line up another trade to add more offense to the team if we intended to give him Lamb's minutes.

That said I think our main trade target should be Gallinari. If we can find a third team to send the Clippers an expiring contract I think we could get him relatively cheaply.

We should avoid Gallinari like the plague. If he costs us anything of even the slightest value it would be a massive overpay. He just can't stay on the court. I would give up Biz and Frank but that is it. Anyone who actually plays now would just result in us losing production.

LofJ · Post #1815 » by **LofJ** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 5:11 pm

BeesWax wrote:
LofJ wrote:
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:0 interest in Fultz.

We need a guard that can defend. Fultz is massively disappointing on offense, but he's a good defender and a decent passer. If we can get him for Lamb and a draft asset I wouldn't be opposed, but we'd have to line up another trade to add more offense to the team if we intended to give him Lamb's minutes.

That said I think our main trade target should be Gallinari. If we can find a third team to send the Clippers an expiring contract I think we could get him relatively cheaply.

We should avoid Gallinari like the plague. If he costs us anything of even the slightest value it would be a massive overpay. He just can't stay on the court. I would give up Biz and Frank but that is it. Anyone who actually plays now would just result in us losing production.

He usually makes it through about 60 games when you take out the two times he missed most of the season. If he can give us that and be healthy for the playoffs we should be happy. He'd be the most offensively talented player on our roster after Kemba by a comfortable margin.

BeesWax · Post #1816 » by **BeesWax** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:55 pm

LofJ wrote:
BeesWax wrote:
LofJ wrote:
We need a guard that can defend. Fultz is massively disappointing on offense, but he's a good defender and a decent passer. If we can get him for Lamb and a draft asset I wouldn't be opposed, but we'd have to line up another trade to add more offense to the team if we intended to give him Lamb's minutes.

That said I think our main trade target should be Gallinari. If we can find a third team to send the Clippers an expiring contract I think we could get him relatively cheaply.

We should avoid Gallinari like the plague. If he costs us anything of even the slightest value it would be a massive overpay. He just can't stay on the court. I would give up Biz and Frank but that is it. Anyone who actually plays now would just result in us losing production.

He usually makes it through about 60 games when you take out the two times he missed most of the season. If he can give us that and be healthy for the playoffs we should be happy. He'd be the most offensively talented player on our roster after Kemba by a comfortable margin.

If he misses 20 games and we count what we lose to get him then do we make the playoffs? If it cost us contributors injuries could cost us the playoffs. Again if you can get him for next to nothing that is fine but if you have to pay anything of value it could kill our whole season.

LofJ · Post #1817 » by **LofJ** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 8:05 pm

BeesWax wrote:
LofJ wrote:
BeesWax wrote:We should avoid Gallinari like the plague. If he costs us anything of even the slightest value it would be a massive overpay. He just can't stay on the court. I would give up Biz and Frank but that is it. Anyone who actually plays now would just result in us losing production.

He usually makes it through about 60 games when you take out the two times he missed most of the season. If he can give us that and be healthy for the playoffs we should be happy. He'd be the most offensively talented player on our roster after Kemba by a comfortable margin.

If he misses 20 games and we count what we lose to get him then do we make the playoffs? If it cost us contributors injuries could cost us the playoffs. Again if you can get him for next to nothing that is fine but if you have to pay anything of value it could kill our whole season.

How much do you think the team would be hurt by the absence of Marvin Williams? As long as Bridges and MKG are healthy I don't think we'd miss a beat. We would be fine if Gallinari misses time.

BeesWax · Post #1818 » by **BeesWax** » Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:57 pm

LofJ wrote:
BeesWax wrote:
LofJ wrote:
He usually makes it through about 60 games when you take out the two times he missed most of the season. If he can give us that and be healthy for the playoffs we should be happy. He'd be the most offensively talented player on our roster after Kemba by a comfortable margin.

If he misses 20 games and we count what we lose to get him then do we make the playoffs? If it cost us contributors injuries could cost us the playoffs. Again if you can get him for next to nothing that is fine but if you have to pay anything of value it could kill our whole season.

How much do you think the team would be hurt by the absence of Marvin Williams? As long as Bridges and MKG are healthy I don't think we'd miss a beat. We would be fine if Gallinari misses time.

I think they would miss his presence massively if there is nothing to replace him. He provides leadership and has played well at times. I also don't think you can get him for only Marvin which is why this hurts so bad. Also in order to trade Marvin for him you have to include Lamb or Parker who we cannot afford to lose for a guy who would miss so much time.

Post #1819 » by **yosemiteben** » Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:26 am

Trade board proposal - Marv for Brandon Knight + HOU 2019 1st

I'd be interested

LofJ · Post #1820 » by **LofJ** » Tue Nov 13, 2018 1:04 am

BeesWax wrote:
LofJ wrote:
BeesWax wrote:If he misses 20 games and we count what we lose to get him then do we make the playoffs? If it cost us contributors injuries could cost us the playoffs. Again if you can get him for next to nothing that is fine but if you have to pay anything of value it could kill our whole season.

How much do you think the team would be hurt by the absence of Marvin Williams? As long as Bridges and MKG are healthy I don't think we'd miss a beat. We would be fine if Gallinari misses time.

I think they would miss his presence massively if there is nothing to replace him. He provides leadership and has played well at times. I also don't think you can get him for only Marvin which is why this hurts so bad. Also in order to trade Marvin for him you have to include Lamb or Parker who we cannot afford to lose for a guy who would miss so much time.

Marvin and Frank is enough to match Gallinari's salary, no need to send anyone else out.