#4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,828
And1: 25,127
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#41 » by E-Balla » Fri Jan 4, 2019 3:58 am

SkyHookFTW wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
cecilthesheep wrote:


Wilt averaged 2.0 fouls per game. Ben Wallace averaged 1.9 fouls per game. Mean anything?

I'm sure Wilt didn't become the all-time rebounding leader by avoiding contact half the game. If you look at the all-time foul leaders there aren't many from the 60's. Hell, Wilt slammed Gus Johnson to the ground so hard he separated Gus' shoulder and didn't get called for a foul.

Ben Wallace played under 30 MPG and he didn't foul out much but he fouled out before. Wilt never did, and he was known to not give full effort at all times.

And that is true that in the 60s you were allowed to do a lot more and not get called so dialing it in back then vs dialing it in now are 2 totally different things but Bill Russell (who also didn't foul much) fouled out about twice a year when he was younger. When combined with great but not stellar DRTGs I can't see how young Wilt didn't foul out ever unless he didn't play as hard once he got that 4th or 5th foul especially since he almost never sat.
User avatar
kendogg
Starter
Posts: 2,321
And1: 513
Joined: Apr 08, 2001
Location: Cincinnati

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#42 » by kendogg » Fri Jan 4, 2019 3:59 am

SkyHookFTW wrote:Wilt averaged 2.0 fouls per game. Ben Wallace averaged 1.9 fouls per game. Mean anything?

I'm sure Wilt didn't become the all-time rebounding leader by avoiding contact half the game. If you look at the all-time foul leaders there aren't many from the 60's. Hell, Wilt slammed Gus Johnson to the ground so hard he separated Gus' shoulder and didn't get called for a foul.


Probably because it was a clean block, but you are right the refs allowed more contact back then. But Wilt took a beating on a nightly basis because of it. People hung on him even worse than Shaq.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,532
And1: 10,015
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#43 » by penbeast0 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:12 am

trex_8063 wrote:...
Spoiler:
All-Defensive Honors “Points” (awarded 1.5 pts for each 1st team, 1.0 pts for each 2nd)
Hakeem Olajuwon - 11.5
David Robinson - 10.0
Ben Wallace - 8.5
Dikembe Mutombo - 7.5
Bill Russell - 1.5 (*only awarded his final season)
Shawn Bradley - 0


DPOY Shares
Ben Wallace - 3.747
Dikembe Mutombo - 2.146
Hakeem Olajuwon - 1.969
David Robinson - 1.331
Shawn Bradley - 0
**not awarded during Russell’s career

DWS
Bill Russell - 143.9
Hakeem Olajuwon - 94.5
David Robinson - 80.1
Ben Wallace - 70.6
Dikembe Mutombo - 68.5
Shawn Bradley - 30.8

DBPM
Ben Wallace: +5.5
David Robinson: +4.3
Hakeem Olajuwon: +3.8
Dikembe Mutombo: +3.6
Shawn Bradley: +3.4
**not available for Russell’s career

Individual rDRTG
David Robinson: -10.0
Ben Wallace: -9.4
Hakeem Olajuwon: -8.6
Dikembe Mutombo: -6.8
Shawn Bradley: -4.0
**not available for Russell’s career

Cumulative Career DVOR
Bill Russell - 181,196.05
Hakeem Olajuwon - 171,267.8
Dikembe Mutombo - 154.734.3
David Robinson - 151,777.8
Ben Wallace - 108,273.3
Shawn Bradley - 70,643.0

Avg DVOR per Season (full career)
Bill Russell - 13,938.2
David Robinson - 10,841.2
Hakeem Olajuwon - 9,514.9
Dikembe Mutombo - 8,596.4
Ben Wallace - 6,767.1
Shawn Bradley - 5,886.9

Avg DVOR per Season (Best 5 years)
Dikembe Mutombo - 18,417.6
Bill Russell - 16,994.7
Hakeem Olajuwon - 14,663.1
David Robinson - 13,808.6
Ben Wallace - 11,727.7
Shawn Bradley - 9,933.7

Avg DVOR Per Game (Best 5 years)
Dikembe Mutombo - 229.6
Bill Russell - 219.6
Hakeem Olajuwon - 184.2
David Robinson - 176.4
Ben Wallace - 150.4
Shawn Bradley - 141.5


I appreciate your reposting this in terms of the Mutombo v. Ben Wallace debate but I doubt anyone is considering Shawn Bradley yet and it doesn't include Wilt, Nate, Kareem, or for that matter Zo or Mikan of the names on my short list so it might not be worth reposting in future threads unless updated.

As it happens, I did see both Nate and Wilt play for a few years and am still torn between them but haven't been convinced to favor either over Mutombo yet. I'd like to favor one of the older guys just because I think the 60s get underrated and I don't think Mutombo had the quickness of the other two but can't see my way to it. Wilt I have questions about the consistency of his defensive effort especially pre 67; did he hang back to rebound like Dennis Rodman? There are some comments about this in Terry Pluto's collection of stories by their peers, Tall Tales. If Nate was so impactful defensively on a team basis, why did the Warriors improve when they dealt him for Cliff Ray? For Mutombo, can you really say his playoff impact came close to approaching either of the other two? I haven't had seen any of these questions dealt with to my satisfaction so I am still up in the air.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#44 » by trex_8063 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:17 am

SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:*In per 100 possession estimates, Nate's single-season BEST was 19.6 TRebs. Wilt's career average was 19.7.
Or put another way: Nate's career average was 16.8 reb/100 possessions; Wilt's single-season LOWEST was 17.1.



Missed shots create more rebounds. Improved shooting by the league decreases rebounds. The league averaged 67 rebounds per game in 1965 and averaged 47 rebounds per game in 1975. Maybe Thurmond was sacrificing rebounds and team defense for man to man defense. I felt like 1980s Kareem had a tendency to sacrifice rebounding in order to provide more help defense.


Just wanted to reply to this one point......

Part of the difference in rpg numbers ('65 v '75) is difference in pace (117.3 v 104.5). If all other things were equal, that reduction in pace would bring the '65 rpg average down to 60.0 (vs 47.3 for '75). The per 100 possession numbers I'd cited account for this. Don't get me wrong, a difference of nearly 13 per game is still pretty darn significant; just not quite as large a difference as you'd indicated.

Further, a decade of their 14-year careers overlap; so the league avg of their respective careers is not going to be anywhere near as large as that.

But since you did bring this up, how about we look at their respective Reb/100 poss estimates for the years they were BOTH in the league?

'64
Wilt: 20.2
Nate: 16.8

'65
Wilt: 20.4
Nate: 17.6

'66
Wilt: 20.3
Nate: 17.5

'67
Wilt: 20.8
Nate: 18.9

'68
Wilt: 19.65
Nate: 19.6

'69
Wilt: 19.9
Nate: 17.9

'70
Wilt: 18.4
Nate: 16.4

'71
Wilt: 17.1
Nate: 14.2

'72
Wilt: 18.6
Nate: 15.8

'73
Wilt: 18.5
Nate: 16.9


So in the ten years their careers overlap, Wilt is out-rebounding him on a per 100 possession basis ALL TEN YEARS (by an average of just over 2.2 Reb/100); and that while generally playing more mpg.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#45 » by trex_8063 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:23 am

penbeast0 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:...
Spoiler:
All-Defensive Honors “Points” (awarded 1.5 pts for each 1st team, 1.0 pts for each 2nd)
Hakeem Olajuwon - 11.5
David Robinson - 10.0
Ben Wallace - 8.5
Dikembe Mutombo - 7.5
Bill Russell - 1.5 (*only awarded his final season)
Shawn Bradley - 0


DPOY Shares
Ben Wallace - 3.747
Dikembe Mutombo - 2.146
Hakeem Olajuwon - 1.969
David Robinson - 1.331
Shawn Bradley - 0
**not awarded during Russell’s career

DWS
Bill Russell - 143.9
Hakeem Olajuwon - 94.5
David Robinson - 80.1
Ben Wallace - 70.6
Dikembe Mutombo - 68.5
Shawn Bradley - 30.8

DBPM
Ben Wallace: +5.5
David Robinson: +4.3
Hakeem Olajuwon: +3.8
Dikembe Mutombo: +3.6
Shawn Bradley: +3.4
**not available for Russell’s career

Individual rDRTG
David Robinson: -10.0
Ben Wallace: -9.4
Hakeem Olajuwon: -8.6
Dikembe Mutombo: -6.8
Shawn Bradley: -4.0
**not available for Russell’s career

Cumulative Career DVOR
Bill Russell - 181,196.05
Hakeem Olajuwon - 171,267.8
Dikembe Mutombo - 154.734.3
David Robinson - 151,777.8
Ben Wallace - 108,273.3
Shawn Bradley - 70,643.0

Avg DVOR per Season (full career)
Bill Russell - 13,938.2
David Robinson - 10,841.2
Hakeem Olajuwon - 9,514.9
Dikembe Mutombo - 8,596.4
Ben Wallace - 6,767.1
Shawn Bradley - 5,886.9

Avg DVOR per Season (Best 5 years)
Dikembe Mutombo - 18,417.6
Bill Russell - 16,994.7
Hakeem Olajuwon - 14,663.1
David Robinson - 13,808.6
Ben Wallace - 11,727.7
Shawn Bradley - 9,933.7

Avg DVOR Per Game (Best 5 years)
Dikembe Mutombo - 229.6
Bill Russell - 219.6
Hakeem Olajuwon - 184.2
David Robinson - 176.4
Ben Wallace - 150.4
Shawn Bradley - 141.5


I appreciate your reposting this in terms of the Mutombo v. Ben Wallace debate but I doubt anyone is considering Shawn Bradley yet and it doesn't include Wilt, Nate, Kareem, or for that matter Zo or Mikan of the names on my short list so it might not be worth reposting in future threads unless updated.



Fair enough. I'll try to get around to adding some names; Ewing and Mourning and Dwight Howard are likely the ones who will be added (because we actually have substantial impact data for their careers). As I say in the quoted post, the shutupandjam site has closed down, so I can no longer look up Estimated Impact defensive splits for older guys (like Wilt and Thurmond); believe me, I'd love to.

Shawn Bradley was merely a curiosity (since Owly had mentioned him a few threads ago), and I'd harvested his numbers [so figured I may as well share them].
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
SkyHookFTW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,555
And1: 3,229
Joined: Jul 26, 2014
         

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#46 » by SkyHookFTW » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:43 am

E-Balla wrote:
SkyHookFTW wrote:
E-Balla wrote:


Wilt averaged 2.0 fouls per game. Ben Wallace averaged 1.9 fouls per game. Mean anything?

I'm sure Wilt didn't become the all-time rebounding leader by avoiding contact half the game. If you look at the all-time foul leaders there aren't many from the 60's. Hell, Wilt slammed Gus Johnson to the ground so hard he separated Gus' shoulder and didn't get called for a foul.

Ben Wallace played under 30 MPG and he didn't foul out much but he fouled out before. Wilt never did, and he was known to not give full effort at all times.

And that is true that in the 60s you were allowed to do a lot more and not get called so dialing it in back then vs dialing it in now are 2 totally different things but Bill Russell (who also didn't foul much) fouled out about twice a year when he was younger. When combined with great but not stellar DRTGs I can't see how young Wilt didn't foul out ever unless he didn't play as hard once he got that 4th or 5th foul especially since he almost never sat.

Since Young Wilt was the biggest draw in the league by far I always wondered if there was one of those unwritten rules told to the refs to not foul Wilt out of a game. It seemed especially that the refs swollowed their whistles when it was Wilt vs Bill. Every Sunday it was Celtics vs Sixers on TV. I remember a Bill Russell interview telling about how much stuff they got away with in the post.
"It's scarier than Charles Barkley at an all you can eat buffet." --Shaq on Shark Week
"My secret to getting rebounds? It's called go get the damn ball." --Charles Barkley
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,828
And1: 25,127
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#47 » by E-Balla » Fri Jan 4, 2019 4:48 am

SkyHookFTW wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
SkyHookFTW wrote:
Wilt averaged 2.0 fouls per game. Ben Wallace averaged 1.9 fouls per game. Mean anything?

I'm sure Wilt didn't become the all-time rebounding leader by avoiding contact half the game. If you look at the all-time foul leaders there aren't many from the 60's. Hell, Wilt slammed Gus Johnson to the ground so hard he separated Gus' shoulder and didn't get called for a foul.

Ben Wallace played under 30 MPG and he didn't foul out much but he fouled out before. Wilt never did, and he was known to not give full effort at all times.

And that is true that in the 60s you were allowed to do a lot more and not get called so dialing it in back then vs dialing it in now are 2 totally different things but Bill Russell (who also didn't foul much) fouled out about twice a year when he was younger. When combined with great but not stellar DRTGs I can't see how young Wilt didn't foul out ever unless he didn't play as hard once he got that 4th or 5th foul especially since he almost never sat.

Since Young Wilt was the biggest draw in the league by far I always wondered if there was one of those unwritten rules told to the refs to not foul Wilt out of a game. It seemed especially that the refs swollowed their whistles when it was Wilt vs Bill. Every Sunday it was Celtics vs Sixers on TV. I remember a Bill Russell interview telling about how much stuff they got away with in the post.

Maybe that was it (makes sense), IDK. What I do know is in the 60s there was no reason anyone that you could claim was Deke level (aka someone that was waaaaay better than Duncan, Robinson, Zo, KG, Wallace, etc) wouldn't consistently have the 2nd best defense in the league if they were truly that good. I just don't see it with how the game was played back then.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#48 » by trex_8063 » Fri Jan 4, 2019 5:32 am

70sFan wrote:.


cecilthesheep wrote:You're using inconsistent team DRtg as an argument against Wilt, but your guy is Mutombo? By that standard, how do you account for:

1995 Nuggets - Mutombo plays 82 games at 37.8 mpg, team DRtg is 108.2, 14th out of 28
1996 Nuggets - Mutombo plays 74 games at 36.7 mpg, team DRtg is 108.1, 17th out of 29
2000 Hawks - Mutombo plays 82 games at 36.4 mpg, team DRtg is 107.9, 25th out of 29

Team DRtg is a noisy stat and not necessarily indicative of an individual defensive player's ability. That said, if that's your knock on Wilt, Mutombo is a weird candidate to advocate for; I even skipped over some other mediocre-to-bad team defenses of his.


I agree there's an inconsistency to using that as a ding against Wilt but not Mutombo. Personally, I think the record of their respective team defenses (and the before/after effects of them arriving and leaving) is a major credit to BOTH of them (I said as much regarding Wilt in one of my prior posts).

But I wanted to speak directly to some of the more unimpressive team defenses seen in Mutombo's career (quoting 70sFan too, because he'd asked about it).....

This is where before/after and with/without can illuminate some things for us, imo. I'm just going to go thru his entire prime looking thru that lens....

'91 Nuggets (before Mutombo): this was an utterly abysmal [worst in the league] +6.8 rDRTG.

'92 Nuggets (rookie Mutombo arrives): important to note that he isn't the only roster change [there were actually quite a few], so it's difficult to isolate improvements to single players. That said, one could certainly make the case that replacing Blair Rasmussen with Mutombo at C was the most relevant change. Their defense improves to a merely mediocre +0.4 rDRTG (a -6.4 improvement from the previous year).

'93 Nuggets: most notable roster change is the addition of rookie LaPhonso Ellis; also get 2nd-year Robert Pack and they get a new coach (Dan Issel; I wouldn't expect him to be particularly defense-oriented). Improve to -1.7 rDRTG.

'94 Nuggets: now a fairly elite -4.0 rDRTG. 2nd-year Bryant Stith is playing more (I think he was passable/decent defensively, though I don't really remember), and add rookie Rodney Rogers (think he was OK defensively too).

'95 Nuggets: LaPhonso Ellis misses basically the whole season, putting Rodney Rogers into a starting role as an undersized PF.
Robert Pack misses half the year too, they've added 34-yr-old Dale Ellis and rookie Jalen Rose (neither good defenders at that point), and they burn thru THREE coaches.
So there's a bit of turmoil, to be sure. They fall to a still respectable -0.1 rDRTG. Worth noting that the two defensive factors that a "verticality" rim-protector like Mutombo is going to effect the most (opp eFG% and DREB%) are the two things the Nuggets were still really good at: 5th in the league in opp eFG%, and 7th in the league in DREB%. But were only 25th (of 27 teams) in opp TOV%, and mediocre in opp FTr.

'96 Nuggets: Roster (and coaching) is a little more stable this year, though they're breaking in some new talent. They've ditched Rodney Rogers and rookie Antonio McDyess is the starting PF (he would eventually be a decent defensive player, but not sure he was as a rookie; arguably no worse than Rodney Rogers at PF though). Increased minutes for Jalen Rose and aging Dale Ellis has largely replaced Reggie Williams on the perimeter (which is probably a small defensive downgrade). Also making some room for minutes to a post-injury Don McLean (not a good defender, if memory serves), and the limited return of post-injury LaPhonso.
They fall marginally to a mediocre +0.5 rDRTG.

'97 Nuggets: Primary roster changes are that Mark Jackson replaces Abdul-Rauf at PG, and Mutombo is now gone (replaced by a decent defensive center in Ervin Johnson). Their defense falls to +4.5 rDRTG (a +4.0 change from the previous year).


'96 Hawks (before Mutombo): This was a team that had Mookie Blaylock at PG, Steve Smith and Stacey Augmon on the perimeter (Augmon very good defensively, Smith fair/respectable iirc). PF Grant Long was also a tough, banging kind of a player with a reasonably solid defensive reputation. They were still surprisingly only a +0.4 rDRTG this season (to be fair, they'd been -3.1 the year before with much the same cast).

'97 Hawks: Mutombo replaces Andrew Lang at C. But other changes include the loss of Grant Long at PF (replaced by Christian Laettner) and Stacey Augmon at SF (replaced by aging Ty Corbin). Mutombo's an obvious upgrade defensively, but one would think the other changes to the starting line-up would be at least a small downgrade defensively. Nonetheless, their rDRTG jumps to an elite-level -4.4 [-4.8 improvement from previous year].

'98 Hawks: Roster pretty stable, but they have an unexplained fall-off defensively, though still respectable at -0.7 rDRTG. fwiw, 9th of 29 teams in opp eFG%, 13th in DREB%.

'99 Hawks: Again swapped Laettner for Grant Long at PF; much the same roster otherwise. Elite-level -5.1 rDRTG (note: 3rd in opp eFG%, 1st in DREB%).

'00 Hawks: Their entire starting line-up [especially the perimeter core] aside from Mutombo is gutted. The one that probably hurts the most defensively is the loss of Mookie Blaylock (replaced by Bimbo Coles and rookie Jason Terry). Smith and Corbin [more or less capable defenders] are gone and replaced by Isaiah Rider and Jim Jackson [both somewhat poor(ish) defenders, iirc]. And Grant Long is gone too. This is a stinker defense: +3.8 rDRTG, 25th (of 29) in the league. fwiw, they did remain 18th and 17th in opp eFG% and DREB%.

'01 Hawks: This is the year Mutombo is traded at the deadline to Philly. The Hawks were a -1.0 rDRTG prior to the trade, and a +8.0 rDRTG after the trade (a +9.0 swing).
The Sixers do NOT see an improvement defensively when they obtain him (in fact, they worsen a bit). Important to note that 34-year-old Mutombo (not his best form anymore, though maybe still in his "prime") was replacing Theo Ratliff (a pretty nice defensive anchor in his own right: NPI DRAPM of +3.5 that year, and ranged between +1.9 to +3.6 every year from '01 to '06......likely a really underrated defender his whole career).


Anyway, I guess I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions from that info. The big take-aways I note (allowing for other roster noise as outlined above) is one team improved -6.4 when he arrived, and worsened by +4.0 when he left. The team he went to improved by -4.8 when he arrived, and worsened by +9.0 when he left (sample size a potential issue??). The last team he arrived to did NOT improve (worsened by +2.6 actually, though again sample size likely an issue).
In general, he was a part of good defenses (avg of -1.25 rDRTG over these ten years, peaking at an elite -5.1). The teams he was a part of tended to rate very well in opp eFG% and DREB% (things an interior big is mostly likely to heavily influence), even during years of mediocre overall defense.

This, combined with all the other indicators as previously provided (DRAPM, WOWYR, etc), eye-test, and box figures have me as a pretty firm believer that this was a special defensive anchor, in an all-time sense.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#49 » by HeartBreakKid » Fri Jan 4, 2019 6:03 am

Hm...perhaps I have been overlooking Mutumbo. There is some convincing data out there of his impact - and self admittedly, I've always stereotyped him to be overrated because he is relatively slow which isn't really fair to him (speed only matters to a certain degree for centers).

Given his elite impact stats, and he anchored a few elite defenses (some mediocre and bad ones sure, but DRTG has a lot of variables), I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt here.

I will switch my vote from Ben Wallace to Dikembe Mutumbo.
User avatar
cecilthesheep
Senior
Posts: 635
And1: 482
Joined: Sep 17, 2018
       

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#50 » by cecilthesheep » Fri Jan 4, 2019 7:37 am

trex_8063 wrote:
70sFan wrote:.


cecilthesheep wrote:You're using inconsistent team DRtg as an argument against Wilt, but your guy is Mutombo? By that standard, how do you account for:

1995 Nuggets - Mutombo plays 82 games at 37.8 mpg, team DRtg is 108.2, 14th out of 28
1996 Nuggets - Mutombo plays 74 games at 36.7 mpg, team DRtg is 108.1, 17th out of 29
2000 Hawks - Mutombo plays 82 games at 36.4 mpg, team DRtg is 107.9, 25th out of 29

Team DRtg is a noisy stat and not necessarily indicative of an individual defensive player's ability. That said, if that's your knock on Wilt, Mutombo is a weird candidate to advocate for; I even skipped over some other mediocre-to-bad team defenses of his.


I agree there's an inconsistency to using that as a ding against Wilt but not Mutombo. Personally, I think the record of their respective team defenses (and the before/after effects of them arriving and leaving) is a major credit to BOTH of them (I said as much regarding Wilt in one of my prior posts).

But I wanted to speak directly to some of the more unimpressive team defenses seen in Mutombo's career (quoting 70sFan too, because he'd asked about it).....

This is where before/after and with/without can illuminate some things for us, imo. I'm just going to go thru his entire prime looking thru that lens....

'91 Nuggets (before Mutombo): this was an utterly abysmal [worst in the league] +6.8 rDRTG.

'92 Nuggets (rookie Mutombo arrives): important to note that he isn't the only roster change [there were actually quite a few], so it's difficult to isolate improvements to single players. That said, one could certainly make the case that replacing Blair Rasmussen with Mutombo at C was the most relevant change. Their defense improves to a merely mediocre +0.4 rDRTG (a -6.4 improvement from the previous year).

'93 Nuggets: most notable roster change is the addition of rookie LaPhonso Ellis; also get 2nd-year Robert Pack and they get a new coach (Dan Issel; I wouldn't expect him to be particularly defense-oriented). Improve to -1.7 rDRTG.

'94 Nuggets: now a fairly elite -4.0 rDRTG. 2nd-year Bryant Stith is playing more (I think he was passable/decent defensively, though I don't really remember), and add rookie Rodney Rogers (think he was OK defensively too).

'95 Nuggets: LaPhonso Ellis misses basically the whole season, putting Rodney Rogers into a starting role as an undersized PF.
Robert Pack misses half the year too, they've added 34-yr-old Dale Ellis and rookie Jalen Rose (neither good defenders at that point), and they burn thru THREE coaches.
So there's a bit of turmoil, to be sure. They fall to a still respectable -0.1 rDRTG. Worth noting that the two defensive factors that a "verticality" rim-protector like Mutombo is going to effect the most (opp eFG% and DREB%) are the two things the Nuggets were still really good at: 5th in the league in opp eFG%, and 7th in the league in DREB%. But were only 25th (of 27 teams) in opp TOV%, and mediocre in opp FTr.

'96 Nuggets: Roster (and coaching) is a little more stable this year, though they're breaking in some new talent. They've ditched Rodney Rogers and rookie Antonio McDyess is the starting PF (he would eventually be a decent defensive player, but not sure he was as a rookie; arguably no worse than Rodney Rogers at PF though). Increased minutes for Jalen Rose and aging Dale Ellis has largely replaced Reggie Williams on the perimeter (which is probably a small defensive downgrade). Also making some room for minutes to a post-injury Don McLean (not a good defender, if memory serves), and the limited return of post-injury LaPhonso.
They fall marginally to a mediocre +0.5 rDRTG.

'97 Nuggets: Primary roster changes are that Mark Jackson replaces Abdul-Rauf at PG, and Mutombo is now gone (replaced by a decent defensive center in Ervin Johnson). Their defense falls to +4.5 rDRTG (a +4.0 change from the previous year).


'96 Hawks (before Mutombo): This was a team that had Mookie Blaylock at PG, Steve Smith and Stacey Augmon on the perimeter (Augmon very good defensively, Smith fair/respectable iirc). PF Grant Long was also a tough, banging kind of a player with a reasonably solid defensive reputation. They were still surprisingly only a +0.4 rDRTG this season (to be fair, they'd been -3.1 the year before with much the same cast).

'97 Hawks: Mutombo replaces Andrew Lang at C. But other changes include the loss of Grant Long at PF (replaced by Christian Laettner) and Stacey Augmon at SF (replaced by aging Ty Corbin). Mutombo's an obvious upgrade defensively, but one would think the other changes to the starting line-up would be at least a small downgrade defensively. Nonetheless, their rDRTG jumps to an elite-level -4.4 [-4.8 improvement from previous year].

'98 Hawks: Roster pretty stable, but they have an unexplained fall-off defensively, though still respectable at -0.7 rDRTG. fwiw, 9th of 29 teams in opp eFG%, 13th in DREB%.

'99 Hawks: Again swapped Laettner for Grant Long at PF; much the same roster otherwise. Elite-level -5.1 rDRTG (note: 3rd in opp eFG%, 1st in DREB%).

'00 Hawks: Their entire starting line-up [especially the perimeter core] aside from Mutombo is gutted. The one that probably hurts the most defensively is the loss of Mookie Blaylock (replaced by Bimbo Coles and rookie Jason Terry). Smith and Corbin [more or less capable defenders] are gone and replaced by Isaiah Rider and Jim Jackson [both somewhat poor(ish) defenders, iirc]. And Grant Long is gone too. This is a stinker defense: +3.8 rDRTG, 25th (of 29) in the league. fwiw, they did remain 18th and 17th in opp eFG% and DREB%.

'01 Hawks: This is the year Mutombo is traded at the deadline to Philly. The Hawks were a -1.0 rDRTG prior to the trade, and a +8.0 rDRTG after the trade (a +9.0 swing).
The Sixers do NOT see an improvement defensively when they obtain him (in fact, they worsen a bit). Important to note that 34-year-old Mutombo (not his best form anymore, though maybe still in his "prime") was replacing Theo Ratliff (a pretty nice defensive anchor in his own right: NPI DRAPM of +3.5 that year, and ranged between +1.9 to +3.6 every year from '01 to '06......likely a really underrated defender his whole career).


Anyway, I guess I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions from that info. The big take-aways I note (allowing for other roster noise as outlined above) is one team improved -6.4 when he arrived, and worsened by +4.0 when he left. The team he went to improved by -4.8 when he arrived, and worsened by +9.0 when he left (sample size a potential issue??). The last team he arrived to did NOT improve (worsened by +2.6 actually, though again sample size likely an issue).
In general, he was a part of good defenses (avg of -1.25 rDRTG over these ten years, peaking at an elite -5.1). The teams he was a part of tended to rate very well in opp eFG% and DREB% (things an interior big is mostly likely to heavily influence), even during years of mediocre overall defense.

This, combined with all the other indicators as previously provided (DRAPM, WOWYR, etc), eye-test, and box figures have me as a pretty firm believer that this was a special defensive anchor, in an all-time sense.

Some great research here; everything makes total sense. Thinking about switching my vote to Mutombo after reading some of the things you and others have come up with; not officially doing it yet though.
All-Time Spurs

T. Parker '13 | J. Silas '76 | J. Moore '83
G. Gervin '78 | M. Ginóbili '08 | A. Robertson '88
K. Leonard '17 | S. Elliott '95 | B. Bowen '05
T. Duncan '03 | L. Aldridge '18 | T. Cummings '90
D. Robinson '95 | A. Gilmore '83 | S. Nater '75
User avatar
cecilthesheep
Senior
Posts: 635
And1: 482
Joined: Sep 17, 2018
       

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#51 » by cecilthesheep » Fri Jan 4, 2019 8:38 am

trex_8063 wrote:2) it's apparent [*see below] that Wilt is the easily superior rebounder (so maybe he's closing more possessions in that fashion, too).

*In per 100 possession estimates, Nate's single-season BEST was 19.6 TRebs. Wilt's career average was 19.7.
Or put another way: Nate's career average was 16.8 reb/100 possessions; Wilt's single-season LOWEST was 17.1.

To this I'd say, raw rebounds per game [edit: thanks to ThaRegul8r for pointing out that you were using per 100, not per game] are not always a very good estimate of how well someone actually rebounds the ball. This is completely unscientific and anecdotal, but on film I see Thurmond doesn't tend to go for rebounds if he has a teammate in the area, focusing instead on boxing out. By contrast, Wilt just hunts the ball. Recent-year examples of stuff like this include Marc Gasol and Al Horford - their rebounding totals are often low, but their teams always rebound really well while they're on the court, to the point that their impact on the glass is probably bigger than stat-hunters such as Andre Drummond and DeAndre Jordan.

Now despite all that, Wilt may indeed have been a better rebounder than Thurmond; I'm not saying I know either way, just that RPG alone doesn't really prove much.
All-Time Spurs

T. Parker '13 | J. Silas '76 | J. Moore '83
G. Gervin '78 | M. Ginóbili '08 | A. Robertson '88
K. Leonard '17 | S. Elliott '95 | B. Bowen '05
T. Duncan '03 | L. Aldridge '18 | T. Cummings '90
D. Robinson '95 | A. Gilmore '83 | S. Nater '75
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,225
And1: 25,493
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#52 » by 70sFan » Fri Jan 4, 2019 9:11 am

Alright, now I'm almost convinced to vote Dikembe Mutombo. Next spot will be fun!
ThaRegul8r
Head Coach
Posts: 6,448
And1: 3,037
Joined: Jan 12, 2006
   

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#53 » by ThaRegul8r » Fri Jan 4, 2019 9:16 am

cecilthesheep wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:2) it's apparent [*see below] that Wilt is the easily superior rebounder (so maybe he's closing more possessions in that fashion, too).

*In per 100 possession estimates, Nate's single-season BEST was 19.6 TRebs. Wilt's career average was 19.7.
Or put another way: Nate's career average was 16.8 reb/100 possessions; Wilt's single-season LOWEST was 17.1.

To this I'd say, raw rebounds per game are not always a very good estimate of how well someone actually rebounds the ball.


Which is exactly why he was talking about rebounds per 100 possessions (as underlined by me), not raw rebounds per game.

100 possessions is 100 possessions regardless of how fast or slow you play, so it's used to control for pace.
I remember your posts from the RPOY project, you consistently brought it. Please continue to do so, sir. This board needs guys like you to counteract ... worthless posters


Retirement isn’t the end of the road, but just a turn in the road. – Unknown
User avatar
cecilthesheep
Senior
Posts: 635
And1: 482
Joined: Sep 17, 2018
       

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#54 » by cecilthesheep » Fri Jan 4, 2019 9:31 am

ThaRegul8r wrote:
cecilthesheep wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:2) it's apparent [*see below] that Wilt is the easily superior rebounder (so maybe he's closing more possessions in that fashion, too).

*In per 100 possession estimates, Nate's single-season BEST was 19.6 TRebs. Wilt's career average was 19.7.
Or put another way: Nate's career average was 16.8 reb/100 possessions; Wilt's single-season LOWEST was 17.1.

To this I'd say, raw rebounds per game are not always a very good estimate of how well someone actually rebounds the ball.


Which is exactly why he was talking about rebounds per 100 possessions (as underlined by me), not raw rebounds per game.

100 possessions is 100 possessions regardless of how fast or slow you play, so it's used to control for pace.

I'm aware of what per-100 stats are. If you read the rest of my comment, I was talking about something completely different. But you're right that I shouldn't have said "raw rebounds per game"; that was my bad, just typing on autopilot I guess.
All-Time Spurs

T. Parker '13 | J. Silas '76 | J. Moore '83
G. Gervin '78 | M. Ginóbili '08 | A. Robertson '88
K. Leonard '17 | S. Elliott '95 | B. Bowen '05
T. Duncan '03 | L. Aldridge '18 | T. Cummings '90
D. Robinson '95 | A. Gilmore '83 | S. Nater '75
PigsOnTheWing
Freshman
Posts: 68
And1: 46
Joined: Jan 23, 2018
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#55 » by PigsOnTheWing » Fri Jan 4, 2019 8:01 pm

Ok so I'm back after some crazy busy weeks with holidays and stuff. This time instead of the usual blend of the 3 statistics I've always used so far (BPM, EI, PIPM) I wanted to try something different. A reason is the fact that shutupandjam have recently been closed because the domain expired. That's a pity since now we're really left with too few pieces of information to get a statistical profile for the 60's players. Nontheless, I think I've found a more useful way to look at stats and I'm thinking about applying it to make the best all-time "objective" list, fwiw. I found the methodology in this piece from squared2020 (which has a lot of greatly insightful pieces on analytics though sometimes the concepts are a bit too complicated and abstract for my taste): https://squared2020.com/2018/12/28/random-manatees-the-art-of-ranking-players/
It borrows the concept from an electoral system (the Kemeny-Young) and allows to compare players across multiple metrics even though they don't have the same "unit of measure" (i.e. wins shares' unit of measure is wins whereas BPM's one is point differential).
The model's goal is to find the ranking that best fits the probability distribution: in other words, it finds the ranking that a random stat among the ones used is more likely to produce. Therefore, if player 1 beats player 2 in every metric, then it is impossible for player 2 to be ranked ahead of player 1 (and really unlikely even if 70% of the stats agree).
I used this model to rank the 13 centers I felt are more likely to get in (including players already selected) and I used the following stats: DWS, DBPM, DPIPM, WOWYR and I processed all of them but WOWYR for both RS career, PS career and 5 year prime.
The most likely result is the following one:

1. Russell

2. Chamberlain
3. Wallace

4. Olajuwon

5. Robinson


6. Mutombo
7. Ewing
8. Howard
9. Kareem
10. Gilmore / Thurmond
12. Mourning / Unseld

QUICK NOTES: As always, we have big holes for pre '74 data and it's even worse without estimated impact: therefore, Russell, Chamberlain and Thurmond rankings, especially for the latter two, must be taken with a grain of salt because the only defensive stat we have for them is DWS, so much that I wondered if it was fair to include them but I ultimately decided to do so.
I added WOWYR to have at least one impact metric for everyone but it causes a major flaw since it includes both offense and defense in its calculation. But one metric out of ten is not that big of a deal so nevermind.
What I wanted to concentrate on is the ranking in itself. I divided players into tiers if the difference between the higher and the lower one was more than 3 points (basically if the higher beats the lower in 3 or more stats).
This creates a quite defined separation between Robinson and Mutombo, with the Admiral doing better than Deke in every single stat that I considered (which came to my surprise).
The player whose ranking seems most flawed (aside from Thurmond who falls on the case of the pre '74 players not being assessed properly) is Ben Wallace. He is absolutely loved by BPM, and to a lesser extent by PIPM, and a part of that is due to the team adjustment included on BPM calculation. To his defense though, he is rated similarly by RAPM so maybe we are underrating him due to the well-known issues of durability/longevity and offensive ineptitude.

I have limited time left so I may add something more tomorrow. As to the vote for this spot, well, I really don't know. I've followed as much as I could the discussion is this and in the prior thread (btw, great job guys) but I couldn't come up with a definite idea.
Gun to my head my vote would go to Wilt but don't consider this a vote, unless we have a run-off, which I doubt. If this thread is still open I should be able to add some more information tomorrow and probably cast a vote. If not, I'll paste this post in the #5 thread hoping to get some feedbacks and discussion on this work.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#56 » by trex_8063 » Sat Jan 5, 2019 12:43 am

Thru post #55 I have the count as follows:

Dikembe Mutombo - 6 (SinceGatlingWasARookie, iggymcfrack, *E-Balla, trex_8063, HeartBreakKid, 70sFan)
Nate Thurmond - 4 (**cecilthesheep, Dr Positivity, Cavsfansince84, Samurai)
Wilt Chamberlain - 2 (SkyHookFTW, kendogg)
Ben Wallace - 1 (Johnny Firpo)


*E-Balla hasn't explicitly said he's casting a vote, though I'm nonetheless inclined to count him toward Deke's total (and not just because I'm voting for Dikembe myself): E-Balla has left little room for uncertainty that Dikembe is the candidate he feels is most deserving, and he's provided a considerable amount of content itt (whereas one or two others pop it to write 2-4 words [their vote] and leave.....yet will have their vote counted). I'll remove his if there are objections, though.

**cecil has indicated he's waffling on his pick, though hasn't changed it yet as far as I've seen.

SkyHookFTW did change his pick, but btw guys: it's easier to not miss a changed pick if you go back and edit your original vote post AND make a second post indicating you've done so.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#57 » by trex_8063 » Sat Jan 5, 2019 1:02 am

SkyHookFTW wrote:Why was Wilt still playing heavy minutes even when he purposely stopped being an offensive hub (last three years averaging about 43 MPG)? It's because he was still a stud defender up to his last game. Dream, D-Rob, Deke, Nate, Big Ben, even Bill Russell can't say that.

Edit: Bill Russell can say that. Got carried away.



Image

Sorry. Just made me think of this, and I've had a drink, so here we go. :D
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,703
And1: 8,339
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: #4 Greatest Defensive C of All-Time - Top 10 Defense at each position project 

Post#58 » by trex_8063 » Sat Jan 5, 2019 4:59 pm

Well, nothing has changed since the last count, so I guess we'll call it for Dikembe.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

Return to Player Comparisons