Edug27 wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:reload141 wrote:
Not really.
I mean, Hardaway and Lee contracts are bad anyway (not really bad but still) so clearing them is a good thing for the Knicks and helps them tank anyway.
As far as moving Porzingis that’s an extremely smart move.
There has been tension between both parties for a while now and the WORST thing they could do (which they would’ve had to do) is maxing him without seeing him play.
This is a 7”3 guy who hasn’t exactly been perfectly healthy coming off an ACL.
Yeah he COULD come back really good but this essentially shifts that risk onto another franchise now.
They likely have KD already.
Trying to figure out why KD would want to go to NY? GS is opening the new arena. The NY media will destroy him. It’ll be more pressure to prove he can win without
a super team. Cali weather to NY weather. Take less money. Idk I get it’s a big market and all.. but I just don’t see the appeal.
I think I understand it even though I am certainly not in his shoes.
First of all, legacy. He gets the Knicks to the NBA finals and loses and that may be better for his NBA legacy than let's say winning 5 titles with the Warriors. Since it is NY and the Knicks are the big franchise there and since they haven't won since 1973 or something like that, winning a championship in NY from a legacy standpoint might be like Lebron winning in Cleveland.
I think KD's finals MVPs are somewhat not as impressive as some others or the stats may suggest in the sense that Curry and Klay open up the court so much for him -- historically great spacing --, that it really becomes fairly easy for any HOF great wing to pick his spots and take advantage of an overextended defense.
As for the weather, you have to remember, Manhattan NY weather not quite as bad as Boston weather. Another big point is NBA player are on the road quite often so for the ones who are not married, the weather isn't that big of a deal unless they are super into something like golf and want to play as much as possible during NBA season. And the other point is from what I have seen a good deal of Warriors star players live in the East Bay in homes that offer more space.
I am not a big time fan of NYC/Manhattan since I kind of think it has too many people and it is a city that is relatively "hard to escape" but in terms of cleanliness and what it offers, it is certainly superior to San Francisco -- the city itself. Once you get outside of Manhattan/San Francisco, the bay area has some real advantages if you like the outdoors. KD may be at the stage of his life that he wouldn't mind actually living in a big city. And if that is the case, I think if you are
mega rich, NYC offers a lot.
If you want to live outside of a city in a huge mansion with a huge lawn, outdoor pool of your own, I think NYC relatively speaking is a bad option probably because of horrific traffic. Under that scenario, I would rather be in Boston, LA, Bay area et cetera.
https://www.sfgate.com/warriors/article/New-video-series-shows-Kevin-Durant-Bay-Area-home-11078868.phpAnyways, KD is single with perhaps a girlfriend that grew up on the East Coast so living in NYC seems like a great option if you can buy a super nice apartment for 25 million which KD obviously can and just live there for a while.