Keith Van Horn wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Keith Van Horn wrote:just spent a few minutes on the GB reading Russell comments.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
there's a good thread debating if he deserves the max or not. That's fine, it's a good topic to discuss. What's laughable though is the dislike for the guy coming in, and the grasping people are doing on why he's such a bad player. It's clear half of them are salty ass Laker fans, or people who've already made their mind up on him based upon previous seasons and don't care how much he's changed and improved. So much ignorance and evidence that none of those people have watched them play and are going based upon what they hear.
*rolls up sleeves*
I wanted to through all the comments and respond to some of the most ignorant ones, but I just don't have the time to deal with the trolls. I'd rather have objective discussions with you guys who "get it" in terms of being a fan of this franchise.
Again I have no problem with everyone debating if he's max-worthy or not, it's just the stupid ass "he's a chucker" and "he's the kind of guy who'd get a max and then go full scrub on his team" that got me![]()
![]()
clearly just none of these guys have been following the progress this franchise has made. They're stuck in 2015.
I have been following this team and agree with some of those posts. You'll probably say I'm a troll because I have a different opinion than you. You're on crack if you'd give a restricted free agent a max contract that's why they have restricted and unrestricted free agency. I doubt other teams would give him the max if the Nets do they'll regret it.




















